OBJECTIVE: Previous studies suggest that many patients with diabetes do not receive an annual dilated eye examination because of a lack of referrals from primary care physicians (PCPs). This study aims to determine the depth of knowledge of PCPs regarding diabetic eye disease. DESIGN: Cross-sectional assessment. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-seven PCPs. METHODS: An 8-question, multiple-choice assessment was administered over a 3-month period to 208 PCPs in attendance at continuing medical education conferences. RESULTS: Ninety-seven PCPs completed the assessment. Participants had a mean total score of 5.9 of 8 possible (73.8%). Questions regarding screening, clinical findings, and prevention were answered correctly by ≥81% of the respondents. However, questions regarding risk factors and complications were answered correctly by less than 35% of the respondents. No difference in scores was found based on the type of residency training received or the number of years in practice. CONCLUSIONS: Although PCPs may require greater education in the complications and risk factors of diabetic eye disease, study participants demonstrated a good overall depth of knowledge regarding diabetic eye disease. Thus, previous reports of only 35% to 55% of patients with diabetes receiving an annual dilated fundus examination are likely not due to a lack of physician education.
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies suggest that many patients with diabetes do not receive an annual dilated eye examination because of a lack of referrals from primary care physicians (PCPs). This study aims to determine the depth of knowledge of PCPs regarding diabetic eye disease. DESIGN: Cross-sectional assessment. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-seven PCPs. METHODS: An 8-question, multiple-choice assessment was administered over a 3-month period to 208 PCPs in attendance at continuing medical education conferences. RESULTS: Ninety-seven PCPs completed the assessment. Participants had a mean total score of 5.9 of 8 possible (73.8%). Questions regarding screening, clinical findings, and prevention were answered correctly by ≥81% of the respondents. However, questions regarding risk factors and complications were answered correctly by less than 35% of the respondents. No difference in scores was found based on the type of residency training received or the number of years in practice. CONCLUSIONS: Although PCPs may require greater education in the complications and risk factors of diabetic eye disease, study participants demonstrated a good overall depth of knowledge regarding diabetic eye disease. Thus, previous reports of only 35% to 55% of patients with diabetes receiving an annual dilated fundus examination are likely not due to a lack of physician education.
Authors: Emily Y Chew; Frederick L Ferris; Karl G Csaky; Robert P Murphy; Elvira Agrón; Darby J S Thompson; George F Reed; Andrew P Schachat Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Sophia Y Wang; Chris A Andrews; Thomas W Gardner; Michael Wood; Kanakadurga Singer; Joshua D Stein Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Sultan H Al-Rashidi; Faris S Al-Thunayyan; Khalid A Alsuhaibani; Abdulmajeed A Alharbi; Khalid A Alharbi Journal: SAGE Open Med Date: 2020-01-15
Authors: Yao Liu; Nicholas J Zupan; Olayinka O Shiyanbola; Rebecca Swearingen; Julia N Carlson; Nora A Jacobson; Jane E Mahoney; Ronald Klein; Timothy D Bjelland; Maureen A Smith Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-11-02 Impact factor: 3.240