Literature DB >> 23931306

Determinants of maximal force transmission in a motor-clutch model of cell traction in a compliant microenvironment.

Benjamin L Bangasser1, Steven S Rosenfeld, David J Odde.   

Abstract

The mechanical stiffness of a cell's environment exerts a strong, but variable, influence on cell behavior and fate. For example, different cell types cultured on compliant substrates have opposite trends of cell migration and traction as a function of substrate stiffness. Here, we describe how a motor-clutch model of cell traction, which exhibits a maximum in traction force with respect to substrate stiffness, may provide a mechanistic basis for understanding how cells are tuned to sense the stiffness of specific microenvironments. We find that the optimal stiffness is generally more sensitive to clutch parameters than to motor parameters, but that single parameter changes are generally only effective over a small range of values. By contrast, dual parameter changes, such as coordinately increasing the numbers of both motors and clutches offer a larger dynamic range for tuning the optimum. The model exhibits distinct regimes: at high substrate stiffness, clutches quickly build force and fail (so-called frictional slippage), whereas at low substrate stiffness, clutches fail spontaneously before the motors can load the substrate appreciably (a second regime of frictional slippage). Between the two extremes, we find the maximum traction force, which occurs when the substrate load-and-fail cycle time equals the expected time for all clutches to bind. At this stiffness, clutches are used to their fullest extent, and motors are therefore resisted to their fullest extent. The analysis suggests that coordinate parameter shifts, such as increasing the numbers of motors and clutches, could underlie tumor progression and collective cell migration.
Copyright © 2013 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23931306      PMCID: PMC3736748          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.06.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  50 in total

1.  Measuring traction forces of motile dendritic cells on micropost arrays.

Authors:  Brendon G Ricart; Michael T Yang; Christopher A Hunter; Christopher S Chen; Daniel A Hammer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Neutrophil morphology and migration are affected by substrate elasticity.

Authors:  Patrick W Oakes; Dipan C Patel; Nicole A Morin; Daniel P Zitterbart; Ben Fabry; Jonathan S Reichner; Jay X Tang
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models.

Authors:  D M Hamby
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 4.  Cytoskeletal dynamics and nerve growth.

Authors:  T Mitchison; M Kirschner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Transient frictional slip between integrin and the ECM in focal adhesions under myosin II tension.

Authors:  Yvonne Aratyn-Schaus; Margaret L Gardel
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Platelet glycoprotein Ibalpha forms catch bonds with human WT vWF but not with type 2B von Willebrand disease vWF.

Authors:  Tadayuki Yago; Jizhong Lou; Tao Wu; Jun Yang; Jonathan J Miner; Leslie Coburn; José A López; Miguel A Cruz; Jing-Fei Dong; Larry V McIntire; Rodger P McEver; Cheng Zhu
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  An adhesion-dependent switch between mechanisms that determine motile cell shape.

Authors:  Erin L Barnhart; Kun-Chun Lee; Kinneret Keren; Alex Mogilner; Julie A Theriot
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Demonstration of catch bonds between an integrin and its ligand.

Authors:  Fang Kong; Andrés J García; A Paul Mould; Martin J Humphries; Cheng Zhu
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Exploring the contextual sensitivity of factors that determine cell-to-cell variability in receptor-mediated apoptosis.

Authors:  Suzanne Gaudet; Sabrina L Spencer; William W Chen; Peter K Sorger
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 10.  Border-cell migration: the race is on.

Authors:  Denise J Montell
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 94.444

View more
  66 in total

1.  A Chemomechanical Model of Matrix and Nuclear Rigidity Regulation of Focal Adhesion Size.

Authors:  Xuan Cao; Yuan Lin; Tristian P Driscoll; Janusz Franco-Barraza; Edna Cukierman; Robert L Mauck; Vivek B Shenoy
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Myosin IIA suppresses glioblastoma development in a mechanically sensitive manner.

Authors:  Hannah S Picariello; Rajappa S Kenchappa; Vandana Rai; James F Crish; Athanassios Dovas; Katarzyna Pogoda; Mariah McMahon; Emily S Bell; Unnikrishnan Chandrasekharan; Amanda Luu; Rita West; Jan Lammerding; Peter Canoll; David J Odde; Paul A Janmey; Thomas Egelhoff; Steven S Rosenfeld
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Two-tiered coupling between flowing actin and immobilized N-cadherin/catenin complexes in neuronal growth cones.

Authors:  Mikael Garcia; Cécile Leduc; Matthieu Lagardère; Amélie Argento; Jean-Baptiste Sibarita; Olivier Thoumine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  An Integrated Stochastic Model of Matrix-Stiffness-Dependent Filopodial Dynamics.

Authors:  Bo Cheng; Min Lin; Yuhui Li; Guoyou Huang; Hui Yang; Guy M Genin; Vikram S Deshpande; Tian Jian Lu; Feng Xu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Actin flow and talin dynamics govern rigidity sensing in actin-integrin linkage through talin extension.

Authors:  Hiroaki Hirata; Keng-Hwee Chiam; Chwee Teck Lim; Masahiro Sokabe
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Force loading explains spatial sensing of ligands by cells.

Authors:  Roger Oria; Tina Wiegand; Jorge Escribano; Alberto Elosegui-Artola; Juan Jose Uriarte; Cristian Moreno-Pulido; Ilia Platzman; Pietro Delcanale; Lorenzo Albertazzi; Daniel Navajas; Xavier Trepat; José Manuel García-Aznar; Elisabetta Ada Cavalcanti-Adam; Pere Roca-Cusachs
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Durotaxis by Human Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Brian J DuChez; Andrew D Doyle; Emilios K Dimitriadis; Kenneth M Yamada
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-01-12       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Master equation-based analysis of a motor-clutch model for cell traction force.

Authors:  Benjamin L Bangasser; David J Odde
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.321

9.  CD28 and CD3 have complementary roles in T-cell traction forces.

Authors:  Keenan T Bashour; Alexander Gondarenko; Haoqian Chen; Keyue Shen; Xin Liu; Morgan Huse; James C Hone; Lance C Kam
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  CD44-mediated adhesion to hyaluronic acid contributes to mechanosensing and invasive motility.

Authors:  Yushan Kim; Sanjay Kumar
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 5.852

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.