Literature DB >> 23931122

Physiologic response of Agaricus subrufescens using different casing materials and practices applied in the cultivation of Agaricus bisporus.

Eustáquio Souza Dias1, Diego Cunha Zied, Danny Lee Rinker.   

Abstract

Casing materials and practices used in the cultivation of Agaricus bisporus were evaluated in the cultivation of Agaricus subrufescens, using the best techniques for optimization of production, including the possibility of re-casing of the compost for the production of a second crop of mushroom. Casing based on peat moss, loam soil or coir was compared to casing material mixed with or without spawn-run compost. Based on the results, we conclude that the casing layer used in the cultivation of A. subrufescens should not necessarily be the same as that used in the cultivation of A. bisporus. For the tested strain cultivated with loam soil as casing layer, the ruffling technique is highly superior to CACing and should be pursued in further research. The re-casing of compost in new cycles showed good results suggesting that the currently used compost could be improved.
Copyright © 2013 The British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agaricus blazei; Agaricus brasiliensis; CACing; Re-casing; Ruffling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23931122     DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2013.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fungal Biol


  2 in total

1.  Selection of strains for shiitake production in axenic substrate.

Authors:  Diego Cunha Zied; William Pereira Maciel; Simone Cristina Marques; Débora Marques da Silveira E Santos; Danny Lee Rinker; Eustáquio Souza Dias
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Mycochemical Characterization of Agaricus subrufescens considering Their Morphological and Physiological Stage of Maturity on the Traceability Process.

Authors:  Diego Cunha Zied; Jose E Pardo; Rafael Simões Tomaz; Celso Tadao Miasaki; Arturo Pardo-Giménez
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-09-10       Impact factor: 3.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.