Literature DB >> 23931095

From physiology to space use: energy reserves and androgenization explain home-range size variation in a woodland rodent.

Ben Godsall1, Tim Coulson, Aurelio F Malo.   

Abstract

This study tested the relationships between both individual-level and predation-risk factors and the size of two home-range regions (HRR), defined as areas of different intensities of use. We have expanded on previous home-range studies by testing the effects of two previously ignored individual-level factors: androgenization and energy reserves (body fat). Location data were collected for wild individuals of Apodemus sylvaticus using the novel method of implanted PIT tags and mobile recording stations. A total of 68 home ranges were estimated using kernel density estimation. Home ranges were split into two regions (HRR): the 'core', representing the most intensively used areas, and 'periphery' regions. Body mass, body fat, sex, anogenital distance (AGD) (a proxy for androgenization) and the proportion of HRR, covered by antipredatory features (shrubs and fallen trees), were tested for their relationship with the size of core and periphery HRRs. Models were constructed for each HRR for three seasons: nonbreeding season (NBS), early and late breeding seasons (LBSs), to account for seasonal variation in behaviour associated with changes in food abundance and reproductive cycles. Body fat had a negative relationship with periphery size and an interaction with sex on core size in the early breeding season (EBS). Body mass also had a significant interaction with sex on core size in the EBS. Androgenization has a strong effect on home range size in both sexes: AGD had a positive relationship with both HRRs for males in the LBS and females in the NBS. Males had larger peripheries than females in both early and LBSs. Habitat features that reduce predation risk explain HRR size throughout the breeding period. This study emphasizes the importance of embracing natural complexity to gain insight into the drivers of space use behaviour; the consideration of individual and ecological factors, the recognition of the species-specific selective pressures that seasonal change presents for each sex and the identification of biologically meaningful home range areas will help advance the field.
© 2013 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AGD; Apodemus sylvaticus; PIT tag; androgens; energy reserves; habitat selection; predation risk; testosterone; utilization distribution; wood mouse

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23931095     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  6 in total

1.  Space use variation in co-occurring sister species: response to environmental variation or competition?

Authors:  Claire M S Dufour; Christine Meynard; Johan Watson; Camille Rioux; Simon Benhamou; Julie Perez; Jurie J du Plessis; Nico Avenant; Neville Pillay; Guila Ganem
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Marked seasonal variation in the wild mouse gut microbiota.

Authors:  Corinne F Maurice; Sarah C L Knowles; Joshua Ladau; Katherine S Pollard; Andy Fenton; Amy B Pedersen; Peter J Turnbaugh
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Negative effects of density on space use of small mammals differ with the phase of the masting-induced population cycle.

Authors:  Michał Bogdziewicz; Rafał Zwolak; Lauren Redosh; Leszek Rychlik; Elizabeth E Crone
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Social networks strongly predict the gut microbiota of wild mice.

Authors:  Aura Raulo; Bryony E Allen; Tanya Troitsky; Arild Husby; Josh A Firth; Tim Coulson; Sarah C L Knowles
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 11.217

5.  A new method for characterising shared space use networks using animal trapping data.

Authors:  Klara M Wanelik; Damien R Farine
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 2.944

6.  Intensity of space use reveals conditional sex-specific effects of prey and conspecific density on home range size.

Authors:  Malin Aronsson; Matthew Low; José V López-Bao; Jens Persson; John Odden; John D C Linnell; Henrik Andrén
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.