| Literature DB >> 23930211 |
Ana Patricia Ortiz1, Orquidea Frías, Javier Pérez, Fernando Cabanillas, Lisa Martínez, Carola Sánchez, David E Capó-Ramos, Carmen González-Keelan, Edna Mora, Erick Suárez.
Abstract
Information on the impact of hormone receptor status subtypes in breast cancer (BC) prognosis is still limited for Hispanics. We aimed to evaluate the association of BC molecular subtypes and other clinical factors with survival in a hospital-based female population of BC cases in Puerto Rico. We analyzed 663 cases of invasive BC diagnosed between 2002 and 2005. Information on HER-2/neu (HER-2) overexpression, estrogen (ER), and progesterone (PR) receptor status and clinical characteristics were retrieved from hospitals cancer registries and record review. Survival probabilities by covariates of interest were described using the Kaplan-Meier estimators. Cox proportional hazards models were employed to assess factors associated with risk of BC death. Overall, 17.3% of BC cases were triple-negative (TN), 61.8% were Luminal-A, 13.3% were Luminal-B, and 7.5% were HER-2 overexpressed. In the multivariate Cox model, among patients with localized stage, women with TN BC had higher risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.57, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.29-5.12) as compared to those with Luminal-A status, after adjusting for age at diagnosis. In addition, among women with regional/distant stage at diagnosis, those with TN BC (HR: 5.48, 95% CI: 2.63-11.47) and those HER-2+, including HER-2 overexpressed and Luminal-B, (HR: 2.73, 95% CI:1.30-5.75) had a higher mortality. This is the most comprehensive epidemiological study to date on the impact of hormone receptor expression subtypes in BC survival in Puerto Rico. Consistent to results in other populations, the TN subtype and HER-2+ tumors were associated with decreased survival.Entities:
Keywords: Breast cancer; Hispanic; Puerto Rico; subtypes; survival
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23930211 PMCID: PMC3699846 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.78
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Med ISSN: 2045-7634 Impact factor: 4.452
Clinical characteristics of the study population, overall and by tumor subtype (n = 663)
| Characteristics | Triple-negative HER-2−, ER−, PR− ( | Luminal-A HER-2−, ER and/or PR+ ( | Luminal-B HER-2+, ER and/or PR+ ( | Her-2 overexpressed HER-2+, ER−, PR− ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at diagnosis | |||||
| <50 years | 41 (35.6) | 108 (26.3) | 37 (42.0) | 26 (52.0) | <0.001 |
| ≥50 years | 74 (64.4) | 302 (73.7) | 51 (58.0) | 24 (48.0) | |
| Age at diagnosis ( | 55.8 ± 1.2 | 59.9 ± 0.7 | 56.3 ± 1.5 | 52.6 ± 2.2 | <0.001 |
| Tumor histology ( | |||||
| Invasive lobular | 4 (3.5) | 94 (23.1) | 13 (14.9) | 1 (2.0) | <0.001 |
| Invasive ductal | 101 (88.6) | 281 (69.0) | 70 (80.5) | 48 (96.0) | |
| Other | 9 (7.9) | 32 (7.9) | 4 (4.6) | 1 (2.0) | |
| Tumor grade ( | |||||
| I – Well differentiated | 5 (5.0) | 75 (21.9) | 5 (6.8) | 1 (2.2) | <0.001 |
| II – Moderately differentiated | 29 (28.7) | 180 (52.5) | 37 (48.7) | 18 (39.1) | |
| III – Poorly differentiated | 58 (57.4) | 79 (23.0) | 25 (32.9) | 25 (54.3) | |
| IV – Undifferentiated aggressive | 9 (8.9) | 9 (2.6) | 9 (11.8) | 2 (4.3) | |
| Tumor size ( | |||||
| <2 cm | 31 (30.4) | 189 (55.4) | 30 (44.1) | 10 (30.3) | <0.001 |
| ≥2 cm | 71 (69.6) | 152 (44.6) | 38 (55.9) | 13 (69.7) | |
| LN metastasis ( | |||||
| Negative | 51 (57.9) | 233 (66.9) | 40 (55.6) | 20 (45.5) | 0.014 |
| Positive | 37 (42.1) | 115 (33.1) | 32 (44.4) | 24 (54.5) | |
| Tumor staging ( | |||||
| Localized | 62 (59.6) | 248 (65.1) | 43 (55.1) | 24 (49.0) | 0.078 |
| Regional/distant | 42 (40.4) | 133 (34.9) | 35 (44.9) | 25 (51.0) | |
| Hospital | 0.335 | ||||
| Oncologic | 61 (53.0) | 187 (45.6) | 42 (47.7) | 28 (56.0) | 0.335 |
| Auxilio mutuo | 54 (47.0) | 223 (54.4) | 46 (52.3) | 22 (44.0) | |
Table 1 shows significant differences in the characteristics of the study population, by tumor subtypes.
Oneway Anova for comparing means.
Fishers exact test P-value.
Five-year survival, overall, and by tumor subtypes
| Tumor subtype | 5-years survival | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|
| Triple-negative (HER-2−, ER−, PR−) | 47.7% | 32.2%–61.6% |
| Luminal-A (HER-2−, ER and/or PR +) | 80.2% | 72.4%–85.9% |
| Luminal-B (HER-2+, ER and/or PR+) | 63.0% | 42.2%–78.1% |
| HER-2 overexpressing (HER-2+, ER−, PR−) | 72.3% | 53.6%–84.5% |
| Overall survival | 71.2% | 64.9%–76.5% |
Table 2 shows that women with TN BC had the lowest 5-year survival.
Hazard ratio (HR) to assess the factors associated with risk of death (n = 663)
| Characteristics | HR crude (95% CI) |
|---|---|
| Breast cancer subtype | |
| Luminal-A (HER-2−, ER and/or PR+) | 1.00 |
| Triple-negative (HER-2−, ER−, PR−) | 3.02 (1.94–4.70) |
| HER-2+ (HER-2+, ER and/or PR±) | 1.79 (1.12–2.87) |
| Age at diagnosis | |
| <50 years | 1.57 (1.02–2.43) |
| ≥50 years | 1.00 |
| Tumor staging ( | |
| Localized | 1.00 |
| Regional/distant | 2.35 (1.58–3.48) |
| Tumor histology ( | |
| Invasive lobular | 1.00 |
| Invasive ductal | 1.68 (0.90–3.16) |
| Other | 2.46 (1.02–5.94) |
| Tumor grade ( | |
| I – Well differentiated | 1.00 |
| II – Moderately differentiated | 3.86 (1.20–12.46) |
| III – Poorly differentiated | 5.71 (1.77–18.46) |
| IV – Undifferentiated aggressive | 2.39 (0.40–14.33) |
| Tumor size ( | |
| <2 cm | 1.00 |
| ≥2 cm | 1.70 (1.06–2.70) |
| LN metastasis ( | |
| Negative | 1.00 |
| Positive | 2.12 (1.37–3.27) |
| Hospital | |
| Oncologic hospital | 1.00 |
| Auxilio mutuo | 1.18 (0.80–1.75) |
Table 3 presents the results from the crude Cox proportional hazards models showing that HER-2+ women and those with TN BC have increased risk of death as compared to those Luminal-A. Other factors associated to risk of death in bivariate analyses included age at diagnosis <50 years, regional/distant stage, and lymph node metastasis.
Hazard ratio (HR) to assess the factors associated with risk of death*
| Stage | ||
|---|---|---|
| Localized ( | Regional/distant ( | |
| Characteristics | HR adjusted (95% CI) | |
| Breast cancer subtype | ||
| Luminal-A (HER-2−, ER and/or PR +) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Triple-negative (HER-2−, ER−, PR−) | 2.57 (1.29–5.12) | 5.48 (11.47) |
| HER-2+ (HER-2+, ER and/or PR±) | 1.36 (0.60–3.09) | 2.73 (1.26–5.75) |
| Age at diagnosis | ||
| <50 years | 2.34 (1.06–5.13) | 1.85 (0.97–3.56) |
| ≥50 years | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Proportional hazards assumption was evaluated and found satisfied (staging localized: P = 0.6849; staging regional/distant: P = 0.8345) after stratification.
Table 4 shows that in both staging categories, women with TN BC had higher risk of death as compared to those with Luminal-A status, after adjusting for age at diagnosis.
Figure 1(A) Age-adjusted survival curves for women with localized stage at time of diagnosis, by breast cancer subtype. (B) Age-adjusted survival curves for women with regional/distant stage at time of diagnosis, by breast cancer subtype.