Literature DB >> 23929731

Examining factors that influence the effectiveness of cleaning antineoplastic drugs from drug preparation surfaces: a pilot study.

Chun-Yip Hon1, Prescillia Ps Chua, Quinn Danyluk, George Astrakianakis.   

Abstract

Occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs has been documented to result in various adverse health effects. Despite the implementation of control measures to minimize exposure, detectable levels of drug residual are still found on hospital work surfaces. Cleaning these surfaces is considered as one means to minimize the exposure potential. However, there are no consistent guiding principles related to cleaning of contaminated surfaces resulting in hospitals to adopt varying practices. As such, this pilot study sought to evaluate current cleaning protocols and identify those factors that were most effective in reducing contamination on drug preparation surfaces. Three cleaning variables were examined: (1) type of cleaning agent (CaviCide®, Phenokil II™, bleach and chlorhexidine), (2) application method of cleaning agent (directly onto surface or indirectly onto a wipe) and (3) use of isopropyl alcohol after cleaning agent application. Known concentrations of antineoplastic drugs (either methotrexate or cyclophosphamide) were placed on a stainless steel swatch and then, systematically, each of the three cleaning variables was tested. Surface wipes were collected and quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to determine the percent residual of drug remaining (with 100% being complete elimination of the drug). No one single cleaning agent proved to be effective in completely eliminating all drug contamination. The method of application had minimal effect on the amount of drug residual. In general, application of isopropyl alcohol after the use of cleaning agent further reduced the level of drug contamination although measureable levels of drug were still found in some cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antineoplastic drugs; cleaning; healthcare; pilot study; surface contamination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23929731     DOI: 10.1177/1078155213497070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract        ISSN: 1078-1552            Impact factor:   1.809


  5 in total

1.  Hazardous Drug Contamination of Drug Preparation Devices and Staff: A Contamination Study Simulating the Use of Chemotherapy Drugs in a Clinical Setting.

Authors:  Evan Call; Brian Bill; Chad McLean; Nathan Call; Allyn Bernkopf; Craig Oberg
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2017-08-20

2.  Comparison of Decontamination Efficacy of Cleaning Solutions on a Biological Safety Cabinet Workbench Contaminated by Cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  Apolline Adé; Laure Chauchat; Johann-François Ouellette Frève; Sébastien Gagné; Nicolas Caron; Jean-François Bussières
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2017-12-21

3.  Efficiency of four solutions in removing 23 conventional antineoplastic drugs from contaminated surfaces.

Authors:  Nicolas Simon; Nicolas Guichard; Pascal Odou; Bertrand Decaudin; Pascal Bonnabry; Sandrine Fleury-Souverain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Environmental assessment of cytotoxic drugs in the Oncology Center of Cyprus.

Authors:  Elpidoforos S Soteriades; Sofia C Economidou; Artemis Tsivitanidou; Petros Polyviou; Amanda Lorimer; Nikos Katodritis; Stavroula Theophanous-Kitiri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A decontamination process adding a tensioactive agent and isopropanol to a closed-system drug transfer device for better control of isolator contamination. A prospective, parallel study.

Authors:  Michèle Vasseur; Nicolas Simon; Chloé Picher; Camille Richeval; Marion Soichot; Luc Humbert; Christine Barthélémy; Sandrine Fleury-Souverain; Pascal Bonnabry; Bertrand Décaudin; Delphine Allorge; Pascal Odou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.