| Literature DB >> 23929589 |
Margaret J Coyle1, Robert Tyrrell, Andrew Godden, Ceri W Hughes, Charles Perkins, Steve Thomas, Daryl Godden.
Abstract
In maxillofacial head and neck oncology, tracheostomy is often used to secure the airway, but not without risk. This study compared the existing practice of two units: one where tracheostomy was routinely done with one where overnight intubation was used. From both units we retrospectively analysed 50 consecutive patients who had intraoral resection, neck dissection, and microvascular reconstruction for head and neck cancer. When compared with tracheostomy, overnight intubation resulted in a shorter mean stay in the intensive therapy unit (ITU) (1.4 compared with 3.7 days), a shorter overall hospital stay (12.9 compared with 18.0 days), less time to first oral intake (8.9 compared with 12.8 days), and a lower rate of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) (10% compared with 38%). This study supports the discontinuation of routine tracheostomy and the adoption of a more selective practice to improve recovery.Entities:
Keywords: Airway management; Enhanced patient recovery; Oral and maxillofacial oncology; Overnight intubation; Tracheostomy
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23929589 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.01.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ISSN: 0266-4356 Impact factor: 1.651