AIMS: Cell function requires formation of molecular clusters localized to discrete subdomains. The composition of these interactomes, and their spatial organization, cannot be discerned by conventional microscopy given the resolution constraints imposed by the diffraction limit of light (∼200-300 nm). Our aims were (i) Implement single-molecule imaging and analysis tools to resolve the nano-scale architecture of cardiac myocytes. (ii) Using these tools, to map two molecules classically defined as components 'of the desmosome' and 'of the gap junction', and defined their spatial organization. METHODS AND RESULTS: We built a set-up on a conventional inverted microscope using commercially available optics. Laser illumination, reducing, and oxygen scavenging conditions were used to manipulate the blinking behaviour of individual fluorescent reporters. Movies of blinking fluorophores were reconstructed to generate subdiffraction images at ∼20 nm resolution. With this method, we characterized clusters of connexin43 (Cx43) and of 'the desmosomal protein' plakophilin-2 (PKP2). In about half of Cx43 clusters, we observed overlay of Cx43 and PKP2 at the Cx43 plaque edge. SiRNA-mediated loss of Ankyrin-G expression yielded larger Cx43 clusters, of less regular shape, and larger Cx43-PKP2 subdomains. The Cx43-PKP2 subdomain was validated by a proximity ligation assay (PLA) and by Monte-Carlo simulations indicating an attraction between PKP2 and Cx43. CONCLUSIONS: (i) Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy, complemented with Monte-Carlo simulations and PLAs, allows the study of the nanoscale organization of an interactome in cardiomyocytes. (ii) PKP2 and Cx43 share a common hub that permits direct physical interaction. Its relevance to excitability, electrical coupling, and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, is discussed.
AIMS: Cell function requires formation of molecular clusters localized to discrete subdomains. The composition of these interactomes, and their spatial organization, cannot be discerned by conventional microscopy given the resolution constraints imposed by the diffraction limit of light (∼200-300 nm). Our aims were (i) Implement single-molecule imaging and analysis tools to resolve the nano-scale architecture of cardiac myocytes. (ii) Using these tools, to map two molecules classically defined as components 'of the desmosome' and 'of the gap junction', and defined their spatial organization. METHODS AND RESULTS: We built a set-up on a conventional inverted microscope using commercially available optics. Laser illumination, reducing, and oxygen scavenging conditions were used to manipulate the blinking behaviour of individual fluorescent reporters. Movies of blinking fluorophores were reconstructed to generate subdiffraction images at ∼20 nm resolution. With this method, we characterized clusters of connexin43 (Cx43) and of 'the desmosomal protein' plakophilin-2 (PKP2). In about half of Cx43 clusters, we observed overlay of Cx43 and PKP2 at the Cx43 plaque edge. SiRNA-mediated loss of Ankyrin-G expression yielded larger Cx43 clusters, of less regular shape, and larger Cx43-PKP2 subdomains. The Cx43-PKP2 subdomain was validated by a proximity ligation assay (PLA) and by Monte-Carlo simulations indicating an attraction between PKP2 and Cx43. CONCLUSIONS: (i) Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy, complemented with Monte-Carlo simulations and PLAs, allows the study of the nanoscale organization of an interactome in cardiomyocytes. (ii) PKP2 and Cx43 share a common hub that permits direct physical interaction. Its relevance to excitability, electrical coupling, and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, is discussed.
Authors: Jifen Li; Vickas V Patel; Igor Kostetskii; Yanming Xiong; Antony F Chu; Jason T Jacobson; Cindy Yu; Gregory E Morley; Jeffery D Molkentin; Glenn L Radice Journal: Circ Res Date: 2005-08-11 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Mike Heilemann; Sebastian van de Linde; Mark Schüttpelz; Robert Kasper; Britta Seefeldt; Anindita Mukherjee; Philip Tinnefeld; Markus Sauer Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2008 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Priscila Y Sato; Hassan Musa; Wanda Coombs; Guadalupe Guerrero-Serna; Gustavo A Patiño; Steven M Taffet; Lori L Isom; Mario Delmar Journal: Circ Res Date: 2009-08-06 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Joseph Wong; David Baddeley; Eric A Bushong; Zeyun Yu; Mark H Ellisman; Masahiko Hoshijima; Christian Soeller Journal: Biophys J Date: 2013-06-04 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: Krishnakumar Kizhatil; Jonathan Q Davis; Lydia Davis; Jan Hoffman; Brigid L M Hogan; Vann Bennett Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2007-07-09 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: John S Lowe; Oleg Palygin; Naina Bhasin; Thomas J Hund; Penelope A Boyden; Erwin Shibata; Mark E Anderson; Peter J Mohler Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 2008-01-07 Impact factor: 10.539
Authors: Dylan A Reid; Sarah Keegan; Alejandra Leo-Macias; Go Watanabe; Natasha T Strande; Howard H Chang; Betul Akgol Oksuz; David Fenyo; Michael R Lieber; Dale A Ramsden; Eli Rothenberg Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-05-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Yu-Hung Chen; Mathew J K Jones; Yandong Yin; Sarah B Crist; Luca Colnaghi; Robert J Sims; Eli Rothenberg; Prasad V Jallepalli; Tony T Huang Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2015-04-02 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Bieke Vanslembrouck; Anna Kremer; Benjamin Pavie; Frans van Roy; Saskia Lippens; Jolanda van Hengel Journal: Histochem Cell Biol Date: 2018-03-05 Impact factor: 4.304
Authors: Antonio Rodríguez-Sinovas; Jose Antonio Sánchez; Laura Valls-Lacalle; Marta Consegal; Ignacio Ferreira-González Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-04-23 Impact factor: 5.923