Literature DB >> 23929266

Loss of androgen receptor expression predicts early recurrence in triple-negative and basal-like breast cancer.

Aye Aye Thike1, Luke Yong-Zheng Chong1, Poh Yian Cheok2, Hui Hua Li3, George Wai-Cheong Yip3, Boon Huat Bay4, Gary Man-Kit Tse1, Jabed Iqbal1, Puay Hoon Tan1.   

Abstract

Treatment of triple-negative invasive breast cancers, defined by the absence of estrogen and progesterone receptors and c-erbB2 expression, remains challenging. Androgen receptor, a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily that is involved in signaling pathways regulating cell proliferation, has been implicated in breast tumorigenesis. We immunohistochemically examined the expression of androgen receptor, basal markers (CK14, 34βE12) and EGFR in 699 triple-negative invasive breast cancers in tissue microarrays using the streptavidin-biotin method, and correlated the findings with clinical outcome. Positive androgen receptor expression was defined as staining of 1% or more of tumor cell nuclei. Survival outcomes were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups with log-rank statistics. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the effect of androgen receptor on survival outcomes. Immunohistochemical positivity was observed in 38% of tumors, with the proportion of stained tumor cells ranging from 1 to 95% (mean 29%, median 10%). Androgen receptor expression was inversely associated with histologic grade and mitotic score. CK14, 34βE12 and EGFR confirmed 85% of cases to be basal-like, without significant association of basal-like phenotype with androgen receptor expression. Disease-free survival was significantly better in androgen receptor-positive triple-negative breast cancer, with a trend for improved overall survival. Decreased recurrence likelihood in both triple-negative and basal-like tumors (hazard ratio, 0.704; 95% confidence intervals, 0.498-0.994; P=0.0464; and hazard ratio, 0.675; 95% confidence intervals, 0.468-0.974; P=0.0355, respectively) was noted within 5 years of diagnosis but not thereafter. Our study suggests that loss of androgen receptor in triple-negative breast cancers augurs a worse prognosis, including those with basal-like features. More work in elucidating its relationship with mechanisms of progression, as well as trials of targeted treatment for androgen receptor-expressing triple-negative tumors, needs to be performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23929266     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2013.145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  52 in total

Review 1.  Role of the androgen receptor in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Murtuza Rampurwala; Kari B Wisinski; Ruth O'Regan
Journal:  Clin Adv Hematol Oncol       Date:  2016-03

2.  An androgen receptor negatively induced long non-coding RNA ARNILA binding to miR-204 promotes the invasion and metastasis of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Fang Yang; Yan Shen; Wenwen Zhang; Juan Jin; Doudou Huang; Hehui Fang; Wenfei Ji; Yaqin Shi; Lin Tang; Weiwei Chen; Guohua Zhou; Xiaoxiang Guan
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 15.828

3.  Clinical significance of androgen receptor expression in triple negative breast cancer-an immunohistochemistry study.

Authors:  Ya-Xuan Liu; Ke-Jing Zhang; Li-Li Tang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Anti-androgen therapy in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Valerie N Barton; Michael A Gordon; Jennifer K Richer; Anthony Elias
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 8.168

5.  Impact of histopathology, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and adjuvant chemotherapy on prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Roberto A Leon-Ferre; Mei-Yin Polley; Heshan Liu; Judith A Gilbert; Victoria Cafourek; David W Hillman; Ahmed Elkhanany; Margaret Akinhanmi; Jenna Lilyquist; Abigail Thomas; Vivian Negron; Judy C Boughey; Minetta C Liu; James N Ingle; Krishna R Kalari; Fergus J Couch; Daniel W Visscher; Matthew P Goetz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 6.  Strategies to avoid treatment-induced lineage crisis in advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Guilhem Roubaud; Bobby C Liaw; William K Oh; David J Mulholland
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 7.  Neoadjuvant Model as a Platform for Research in Breast Cancer and Novel Targets under Development in this Field.

Authors:  Santiago Escrivá-de-Romaní; Miriam Arumí; Esther Zamora; Meritxell Bellet
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Androgen Receptor Supports an Anchorage-Independent, Cancer Stem Cell-like Population in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Valerie N Barton; Jessica L Christenson; Michael A Gordon; Lisa I Greene; Thomas J Rogers; Kiel Butterfield; Beatrice Babbs; Nicole S Spoelstra; Nicholas C D'Amato; Anthony Elias; Jennifer K Richer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  NKX3.1 is expressed in ER-positive and AR-positive primary breast carcinomas.

Authors:  Rebecca J Asch-Kendrick; Mark A Samols; Mohammed T Lilo; Andrea P Subhawong; Rajni Sharma; Peter B Illei; Pedram Argani; Ashley Cimino-Mathews
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Androgen receptor (AR) expression in 400 breast carcinomas: is routine AR assessment justified?

Authors:  Damoun Safarpour; Shabnam Pakneshan; Fattaneh A Tavassoli
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 6.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.