Literature DB >> 23929186

Letter to the editor, reply to "commentary on meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC)" by Pisanu et al. (J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16:1790-1801).

Adolfo Pisanu1, Isabella Reccia, Giulia Porceddu, Alessandro Uccheddu.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23929186     DOI： 10.1007/s11605-013-2306-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN： 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

Review 1.  Critical appraisal of single port access cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P Allemann; M Schafer; N Demartines
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Marks; Melissa S Phillips; Roberto Tacchino; Kurt Roberts; Raymond Onders; George DeNoto; Gary Gecelter; Eugene Rubach; Homero Rivas; Arsalla Islam; Nathaniel Soper; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Alexander Rosemurgy; Sharona Ross; Sajani Shah
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 6.113
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.