Blair S Grace1, Sean E Kennedy, Philip A Clayton, Stephen P McDonald. 1. Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA), Level 9, East Wing, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, blair@anzdata.org.au.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transplantation is the preferred treatment for children with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Pre-emptive transplants, those from live donors and with few human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches provide the best outcomes. Studies into disparities in paediatric transplantation to date have not adequately disentangled different transplant types. METHODS: We studied a retrospective cohort of 823 patients aged <18 years who started renal replacement therapy (RRT) in Australia 1990-2011, using the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA). The primary outcomes were time to first kidney transplant and kidney donor type (deceased or living), analysed using competing risk regression. RESULTS: Caucasian patients were most likely to receive any transplant, due largely to disparities in live donor transplantation. No Indigenous patients received a pre-emptive transplant. Indigenous patients were least likely to receive a transplant from a live donor (sub-hazard ratio 0.41, 95 % confidence interval 0.20-0.82, compared to Caucasians). Caucasian recipients had fewer HLA mismatches, were less sensitised and were more likely to have kidney diseases that could be diagnosed early or progress slowly. CONCLUSIONS: Caucasian paediatric patients are more likely to receive optimum treatment--a transplant from a living donor and fewer HLA mismatches. Further work is required to identify and address barriers to live donor transplantation among minority racial groups.
BACKGROUND: Transplantation is the preferred treatment for children with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Pre-emptive transplants, those from live donors and with few human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches provide the best outcomes. Studies into disparities in paediatric transplantation to date have not adequately disentangled different transplant types. METHODS: We studied a retrospective cohort of 823 patients aged <18 years who started renal replacement therapy (RRT) in Australia 1990-2011, using the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA). The primary outcomes were time to first kidney transplant and kidney donor type (deceased or living), analysed using competing risk regression. RESULTS: Caucasian patients were most likely to receive any transplant, due largely to disparities in live donor transplantation. No Indigenous patients received a pre-emptive transplant. Indigenous patients were least likely to receive a transplant from a live donor (sub-hazard ratio 0.41, 95 % confidence interval 0.20-0.82, compared to Caucasians). Caucasian recipients had fewer HLA mismatches, were less sensitised and were more likely to have kidney diseases that could be diagnosed early or progress slowly. CONCLUSIONS: Caucasian paediatric patients are more likely to receive optimum treatment--a transplant from a living donor and fewer HLA mismatches. Further work is required to identify and address barriers to live donor transplantation among minority racial groups.
Authors: Susan M Samuel; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Alberto Nettel-Aguirre; Bethany Foster; Andrea Soo; R Todd Alexander; Marcello Tonelli Journal: Pediatr Transplant Date: 2012-04-10
Authors: Karen E Yeates; Alan Cass; Thomas D Sequist; Stephen P McDonald; Meg J Jardine; Lilyanna Trpeski; John Z Ayanian Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2009-06-24 Impact factor: 10.612