Literature DB >> 23928564

Asymmetries in visuomotor recalibration of time perception: does causal binding distort the window of integration?

Marieke Rohde1, Leonie Greiner2, Marc O Ernst3.   

Abstract

The recalibration of perceived visuomotor simultaneity to vision-lead and movement-lead temporal discrepancies is marked by an underlying causal asymmetry, if the movement (button press) is voluntary and self-initiated; a visual stimulus lagging the button press may be interpreted as causally linked sensory feedback (intentional or causal binding), a leading visual stimulus not. Here, we test whether this underlying causal asymmetry leads to directional asymmetries in the temporal recalibration of visuomotor time perception, using an interval estimation paradigm. Participants were trained to the presence of one of three temporal discrepancies between a motor action (button press) and a visual stimulus (flashed disk): 100 ms vision-lead, simultaneity, and 100 ms movement-lead. By adjusting a point on a visual scale, participants then estimated the interval between the visual stimulus and the button press over a range of discrepancies. Comparing the results across conditions, we found that temporal recalibration appears to be implemented nearly exclusively on the movement-lead side of the range of discrepancies by a uni-lateral lengthening or shortening of the window of temporal integration. Interestingly, this marked asymmetry does not lead to a significantly asymmetrical recalibration of the point of subjective simultaneity or to significant differences in discriminability. This seeming contradiction (symmetrical recalibration of subjective simultaneity and asymmetrical recalibration of interval estimation) poses a challenge to common models of temporal order perception that assume an underlying time measurement process with Gaussian noise. Using a two-criterion model of the window of temporal integration, we illustrate that a compressive bias around perceived simultaneity (temporal integration) even prior to perceptual decisions about temporal order would be very hard to detect given the sensitivity of the psychophysical procedures commonly used.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intentional binding; Multimodal perception; Temporal recalibration; Time perception; Visuomotor integration

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23928564     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  7 in total

1.  Vestibular-somatosensory interactions affect the perceived timing of tactile stimuli.

Authors:  Stefania S Moro; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Voluntary and Involuntary Movements Widen the Window of Subjective Simultaneity.

Authors:  B Ezgi Arikan; Bianca M van Kemenade; Benjamin Straube; Laurence R Harris; Tilo Kircher
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-07-07

3.  Sense of Agency in Multi-Step Actions.

Authors:  Patricia Garrido-Vásquez; Tanja Rock
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2020-04-08

4.  Auditory dominance in motor-sensory temporal recalibration.

Authors:  Yoshimori Sugano; Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Audio-motor but not visuo-motor temporal recalibration speeds up sensory processing.

Authors:  Yoshimori Sugano; Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  The perceived present: What is it, and what is it there for?

Authors:  Peter A White
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-08

7.  Effects of prolonged exposure to feedback delay on the qualitative subjective experience of virtual reality.

Authors:  Loes C J van Dam; Joey R Stephens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.