Literature DB >> 23928298

Calibrated bioresorbable microspheres: a preliminary study on the level of occlusion and arterial distribution in a rabbit kidney model.

Lihui Weng1, Myra Rusten, Reza Talaie, Mehrdad Hairani, Nikolaus K Rosener, Jafar Golzarian.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the level of occlusion and arterial distribution of calibrated bioresorbable microspheres (BRMS-I and BRMS-II) compared with tris-acryl gelatin microspheres (TGMS) after renal embolization.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six rabbits underwent renal embolization with 100-300 µm BRMS-I and TGMS; three rabbits received partial occlusion (group 1, n = 3), and three rabbits received total occlusion (group 2, n = 3). Four other rabbits received 100-300 µm BRMS-II (with higher cross-linking density than BRMS-I) in the left kidneys reaching total occlusion (group 3, n = 4). Coronal sections of the kidneys were histologically analyzed. Ease of injection, microsphere deformation, vessel sizes, and arterial distribution were assessed.
RESULTS: The injection of BRMS-I, BRMS-II, and TGMS through microcatheters went smoothly without any clogging. In group 1, BRMS identification was easier than TGMS. In group 2, both BRMS-I and TGMS were observed in all three arterial levels (interlobar, arcuate, and interlobular arteries) without a significant difference (P = .84). BRMS-I were not significantly different from TGMS in the mean diameter of vessels occluded (197 µm ± 23 vs 158 µm ± 21, P = .25) or the microsphere deformation (8.85% ± 0.53% vs 11.80% ± 0.64%, P = .071). In group 3, the arterial distribution of BRMS-II was significantly different from BRMS-I and TGMS (P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: In occluding arteries, 100-300 µm BRMS-I were not significantly different from 100-300 µm TGMS. Arterial distribution of BRMS can be influenced by their cross-linking density. © SIR, 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRMS; D%; H&E; TGMS; bioresorbable microspheres; deformation percentage; hematoxylin and eosin; tris-acryl gelatin microspheres

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23928298     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  4 in total

1.  Calibrated Bioresorbable Microspheres as an Embolic Agent: An Experimental Study in a Rabbit Renal Model.

Authors:  Lihui Weng; Davis Seelig; Parinaz Rostamzadeh; Jafar Golzarian
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 2.  Particle Distribution in Embolotherapy, How Do They Get There? A Critical Review of the Factors Affecting Arterial Distribution of Embolic Particles.

Authors:  Reza Talaie; Pooya Torkian; Omid Amili; Yasmina Aboufirass; Nassir Rostambeigi; Hamed Jalaeian; Jafar Golzarian
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  Advances in Degradable Embolic Microspheres: A State of the Art Review.

Authors:  Jensen Doucet; Lauren Kiri; Kathleen O'Connell; Sharon Kehoe; Robert J Lewandowski; David M Liu; Robert J Abraham; Daniel Boyd
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2018-01-26

4.  Handling and performance characteristics of a new small caliber radiopaque embolic microsphere.

Authors:  Andrew L Lewis; Marcus Caine; Pedro Garcia; Koorosh Ashrafi; Yiqing Tang; Lorcan Hinchcliffe; Wei Guo; Zainab Bascal; Hugh Kilpatrick; Sean L Willis
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.368

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.