Lihui Weng 1 , Myra Rusten , Reza Talaie , Mehrdad Hairani , Nikolaus K Rosener , Jafar Golzarian . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the level of occlusion and arterial distribution of calibrated bioresorbable microspheres (BRMS-I and BRMS-II) compared with tris-acryl gelatin microspheres (TGMS) after renal embolization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six rabbits underwent renal embolization with 100-300 µm BRMS-I and TGMS; three rabbits received partial occlusion (group 1, n = 3), and three rabbits received total occlusion (group 2, n = 3). Four other rabbits received 100-300 µm BRMS-II (with higher cross-linking density than BRMS-I) in the left kidneys reaching total occlusion (group 3, n = 4). Coronal sections of the kidneys were histologically analyzed. Ease of injection, microsphere deformation, vessel sizes, and arterial distribution were assessed. RESULTS: The injection of BRMS-I, BRMS-II, and TGMS through microcatheters went smoothly without any clogging. In group 1, BRMS identification was easier than TGMS. In group 2, both BRMS-I and TGMS were observed in all three arterial levels (interlobar, arcuate, and interlobular arteries) without a significant difference (P = .84). BRMS-I were not significantly different from TGMS in the mean diameter of vessels occluded (197 µm ± 23 vs 158 µm ± 21, P = .25) or the microsphere deformation (8.85% ± 0.53% vs 11.80% ± 0.64%, P = .071). In group 3, the arterial distribution of BRMS-II was significantly different from BRMS-I and TGMS (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: In occluding arteries, 100-300 µm BRMS-I were not significantly different from 100-300 µm TGMS. Arterial distribution of BRMS can be influenced by their cross-linking density. © SIR, 2013.
PURPOSE: To assess the level of occlusion and arterial distribution of calibrated bioresorbable microspheres (BRMS-I and BRMS-II) compared with tris -acryl gelatin microspheres (TGMS) after renal embolization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six rabbits underwent renal embolization with 100-300 µm BRMS-I and TGMS; three rabbits received partial occlusion (group 1, n = 3), and three rabbits received total occlusion (group 2, n = 3). Four other rabbits received 100-300 µm BRMS-II (with higher cross-linking density than BRMS-I) in the left kidneys reaching total occlusion (group 3, n = 4). Coronal sections of the kidneys were histologically analyzed. Ease of injection, microsphere deformation, vessel sizes, and arterial distribution were assessed. RESULTS: The injection of BRMS-I, BRMS-II, and TGMS through microcatheters went smoothly without any clogging. In group 1, BRMS identification was easier than TGMS. In group 2, both BRMS-I and TGMS were observed in all three arterial levels (interlobar, arcuate, and interlobular arteries) without a significant difference (P = .84). BRMS-I were not significantly different from TGMS in the mean diameter of vessels occluded (197 µm ± 23 vs 158 µm ± 21, P = .25) or the microsphere deformation (8.85% ± 0.53% vs 11.80% ± 0.64%, P = .071). In group 3, the arterial distribution of BRMS-II was significantly different from BRMS-I and TGMS (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: In occluding arteries, 100-300 µm BRMS-I were not significantly different from 100-300 µm TGMS. Arterial distribution of BRMS can be influenced by their cross-linking density. © SIR, 2013.
Entities: Chemical
Disease
Species
Keywords:
BRMS; D%; H&E; TGMS; bioresorbable microspheres; deformation percentage; hematoxylin and eosin; tris-acryl gelatin microspheres
Mesh: See more »
Substances: See more »
Year: 2013
PMID: 23928298 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.06.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol ISSN: 1051-0443 Impact factor: 3.464