Literature DB >> 23927867

Determinants of percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting: an interprovincial comparison.

Maral Ouzounian1, William Ghali, Alexandra M Yip, Karen J Buth, Karin Humphries, Therese A Stukel, Colleen M Norris, Danielle A Southern, P Diane Galbraith, Christopher R Thompson, James Abel, Michael P Love, Ansar Hassan, Gregory M Hirsch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Marked variation exists concerning the utilization of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The objective of this study was to examine differences in predictors of mode of revascularization across 3 provincial jurisdictions.
METHODS: All patients who underwent PCI and isolated CABG in British Columbia, Alberta, and Nova Scotia between 1996 and 2007 were considered. Age- and sex-standardized rates of PCI and CABG per 100,000 population and PCI to CABG ratios were calculated by year and province. Logistic regression models were constructed to identify independent predictors of mode of revascularization in each province.
RESULTS: A total of 32,190 and 69,409 patients underwent CABG and PCI, respectively, during the study period. Significant increases in the age- and sex-adjusted PCI to CABG ratios were observed in all 3 provinces, but these ratios differed between provinces. Across all 3 jurisdictions, female sex and diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome favoured increased PCI vs CABG, and increased age, left main, or 3-vessel disease occurring before myocardial infarction, and diabetes favoured lower PCI vs CABG. After adjusting for clinical and angiographic factors, there remained a significant variation in choice of PCI vs CABG between the 3 provinces over time.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant interprovincial variability in PCI to CABG ratios was observed. Though certain patient-related factors predictive of either PCI or CABG were identified, factors beyond clinical presentation played a role in the choice of revascularization approach.
Copyright © 2013 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23927867     DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.03.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  2 in total

1.  Recovery free of heart failure after acute coronary syndrome and coronary revascularization.

Authors:  Alec Falkenham; Manoj K Saraswat; Chloe Wong; Kareem Gawdat; Tanya Myers; Jahanara Begum; Karen J Buth; Ian Haidl; Jean Marshall; Jean-Francois Légaré
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2017-07-24

2.  Variations in Coronary Revascularization Practices and Their Effect on Long-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  Rodolfo V Rocha; Xuesong Wang; Stephen E Fremes; Derrick Y Tam; Dennis T Ko; Vladimír Džavík; Edward L Hannan; Peter C Austin; Maral Ouzounian; Douglas S Lee
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 5.501

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.