Literature DB >> 23927839

Maximizing the quantitative accuracy and reproducibility of Förster resonance energy transfer measurement for screening by high throughput widefield microscopy.

Fred Schaufele1.   

Abstract

Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) between fluorescent proteins (FPs) provides insights into the proximities and orientations of FPs as surrogates of the biochemical interactions and structures of the factors to which the FPs are genetically fused. As powerful as FRET methods are, technical issues have impeded their broad adoption in the biologic sciences. One hurdle to accurate and reproducible FRET microscopy measurement stems from variable fluorescence backgrounds both within a field and between different fields. Those variations introduce errors into the precise quantification of fluorescence levels on which the quantitative accuracy of FRET measurement is highly dependent. This measurement error is particularly problematic for screening campaigns since minimal well-to-well variation is necessary to faithfully identify wells with altered values. High content screening depends also upon maximizing the numbers of cells imaged, which is best achieved by low magnification high throughput microscopy. But, low magnification introduces flat-field correction issues that degrade the accuracy of background correction to cause poor reproducibility in FRET measurement. For live cell imaging, fluorescence of cell culture media in the fluorescence collection channels for the FPs commonly used for FRET analysis is a high source of background error. These signal-to-noise problems are compounded by the desire to express proteins at biologically meaningful levels that may only be marginally above the strong fluorescence background. Here, techniques are presented that correct for background fluctuations. Accurate calculation of FRET is realized even from images in which a non-flat background is 10-fold higher than the signal.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Androgen receptor; Fluorescence; Förster resonance energy transfer; High content analysis; High throughput microscopy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23927839      PMCID: PMC3916941          DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.07.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods        ISSN: 1046-2023            Impact factor:   3.608


  41 in total

Review 1.  Fanciful FRET.

Authors:  Steven S Vogel; Christopher Thaler; Srinagesh V Koushik
Journal:  Sci STKE       Date:  2006-04-18

2.  Cerulean, Venus, and VenusY67C FRET reference standards.

Authors:  Srinagesh V Koushik; Huanmian Chen; Christopher Thaler; Henry L Puhl; Steven S Vogel
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  FRET by fluorescence polarization microscopy.

Authors:  David W Piston; Mark A Rizzo
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.441

4.  An improved cerulean fluorescent protein with enhanced brightness and reduced reversible photoswitching.

Authors:  Michele L Markwardt; Gert-Jan Kremers; Catherine A Kraft; Krishanu Ray; Paula J C Cranfill; Korey A Wilson; Richard N Day; Rebekka M Wachter; Michael W Davidson; Megan A Rizzo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Trafficking of the androgen receptor in living cells with fused green fluorescent protein-androgen receptor.

Authors:  V Georget; J M Lobaccaro; B Terouanne; P Mangeat; J C Nicolas; C Sultan
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  1997-04-25       Impact factor: 4.102

Review 6.  FRET microscopy in 2010: the legacy of Theodor Förster on the 100th anniversary of his birth.

Authors:  Yuansheng Sun; Horst Wallrabe; Soo-Ah Seo; Ammasi Periasamy
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.102

Review 7.  Fluorescence resonance energy transfer microscopy of localized protein interactions in the living cell nucleus.

Authors:  R N Day; A Periasamy; F Schaufele
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 8.  New strategies in metastatic prostate cancer: targeting the androgen receptor signaling pathway.

Authors:  Gerhardt Attard; Juliet Richards; Johann S de Bono
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  A cellular conformation-based screen for androgen receptor inhibitors.

Authors:  Jeremy O Jones; Marc I Diamond
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 5.100

10.  Improving FRET dynamic range with bright green and red fluorescent proteins.

Authors:  Amy J Lam; François St-Pierre; Yiyang Gong; Jesse D Marshall; Paula J Cranfill; Michelle A Baird; Michael R McKeown; Jörg Wiedenmann; Michael W Davidson; Mark J Schnitzer; Roger Y Tsien; Michael Z Lin
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-09-09       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  2 in total

1.  Advantages and Limitations of Androgen Receptor-Based Methods for Detecting Anabolic Androgenic Steroid Abuse as Performance Enhancing Drugs.

Authors:  Kathy Bailey; Tahmineh Yazdi; Umesh Masharani; Blake Tyrrell; Anthony Butch; Fred Schaufele
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Auto-FPFA: An Automated Microscope for Characterizing Genetically Encoded Biosensors.

Authors:  Tuan A Nguyen; Henry L Puhl; An K Pham; Steven S Vogel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.