Literature DB >> 23927347

A fast method for rescaling voxel S values for arbitrary voxel sizes in targeted radionuclide therapy from a single Monte Carlo calculation.

María Fernández1, Heribert Hänscheid, Thibault Mauxion, Manuel Bardiès, Peter Kletting, Gerhard Glatting, Michael Lassmann.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In targeted radionuclide therapy, patient-specific dosimetry based on voxel S values (VSVs) is preferable to dosimetry based on mathematical phantoms. Monte-Carlo (MC) simulations are necessary to deduce VSVs for those voxel sizes required by quantitative imaging. The aim of this study is, starting from a single set of high-resolution VSVs obtained by MC simulations for a small voxel size along one single axis perpendicular to the source voxel, to present a suitable method to accurately calculate VSVs for larger voxel sizes.
METHODS: Accurate sets of VSVs for target voxel to source voxel distances up to 10 cm were obtained for high-resolution voxel sizes (0.5 mm for electrons and 1.0 mm for photons) from MC simulations for Y-90, Lu-177, and I-131 using the radiation transport code MCNPX v.2.7a. To make these values suitable to any larger voxel size, different analytical methods (based on resamplings, interpolations, and fits) were tested and compared to values obtained by direct MC simulations. As a result, an optimal calculation procedure is proposed. This procedure consisted of: (1) MC simulation for obtaining of a starting set of VSVs along a single line of voxels for a small voxel size for each radionuclide and type of radiation; (2) interpolation within the values obtained in point (1) for obtaining the VSVs for voxels within a spherical volume; (3) resampling of the data obtained in (1) and (2) for obtaining VSVs for voxels sizes larger than the one used for the MC calculation for integer voxel ratios (voxel ratio=new voxel size∕voxel size MC simulation); (4) interpolation on within the data obtained in (3) for integer voxel ratios. The results were also compared to results from other authors.
RESULTS: The results obtained with the method proposed in this work show deviations relative to the source voxel below 1% for I-131 and Lu-177 and below 1.5% for Y-90 as compared with values obtained by direct MC simulations for voxel sizes ranging between 1.0 and 10.0 cm. The results obtained in this work show differences between the scored deposited energy and the emitted energy lower than 2% for electron radiation. Higher differences, attributable to the short considered radius of 10 cm in comparison with their penetration, can be found for photons. The authors' results agree well with previously published data obtained by other authors using different methods.
CONCLUSIONS: A reliable and fast approach for obtaining accurate VSVs for voxel sizes larger than the voxel size used for the MC calculation of the starting set of high-resolution VSVs was developed and successfully tested for three different radionuclides of interest for targeted radiotherapy: one pure beta (Y-90) and 2 beta-gamma emitters (Lu-177 und I-131). Applying the method of this work allows any interested reader to repeat the calculations for arbitrary radionuclides of interest and∕or smaller high-resolution voxel sizes, provided the means for running MC simulations are available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23927347     DOI: 10.1118/1.4812684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  4 in total

1.  What You See Is Not What You Get: On the Accuracy of Voxel-Based Dosimetry in Molecular Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Johannes Tran-Gia; Maikol Salas-Ramirez; Michael Lassmann
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  A review of 3D image-based dosimetry, technical considerations and emerging perspectives in 90Y microsphere therapy.

Authors:  Jim O' Doherty
Journal:  J Diagn Imaging Ther       Date:  2015-04-28

Review 3.  Dosimetry methods and clinical applications in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for neuroendocrine tumours: a literature review.

Authors:  Daphne Merel Valerie Huizing; Berlinda Jantina de Wit-van der Veen; Marcel Verheij; Marcellus Petrus Maria Stokkel
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.138

Review 4.  Current Status of Radiopharmaceutical Therapy.

Authors:  Sara St James; Bryan Bednarz; Stanley Benedict; Jeffrey C Buchsbaum; Yuni Dewaraja; Eric Frey; Robert Hobbs; Joseph Grudzinski; Emilie Roncali; George Sgouros; Jacek Capala; Ying Xiao
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 7.038

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.