Literature DB >> 23927008

Nanoparticle filtration performance of filtering facepiece respirators and canister/cartridge filters.

Samy Rengasamy1, Roland BerryAnn, Jonathan Szalajda.   

Abstract

Respiratory protection offered by a particulate respirator is a function of the filter efficiency and face seal leakage. A previous study in our laboratory measured the filter penetration and total inward leakage (TIL) of 20-1000 nm size particles for N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) using a breathing manikin. The results showed relatively higher filter penetration and TIL value under different leak sizes and flow rates at the most penetrating particle size (MPPS), ∼45 nm for electrostatic FFRs,and ∼150 nm for the same FFRs after charge removal. This indicates an advantage of mechanical filters over electrostatic filters rated for similar filter efficiencies in providing respiratory protection in nanoparticle workplaces. To better understand the influence of the MPPS, the filtration performance of commonly used one N95 and one N100 FFR models, and four P100 canister/cartridge models were measured with monodisperse NaCl aerosols, and polydisperse NaCl aerosols employed in the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) certification test method. As expected, the polydisperse aerosol penetration was below 5% for the N95 FFR, and below 0.03% for the N100 FFR and P100 canister/cartridge filters. Monodisperse aerosol penetration results showed a MPPS of ∼40 nm for both the N95 and N100 FFRs. All four P100 canister/cartridge filters had a MPPS of ≥150 nm, similar to expectations for mechanical filters. The P100 canister/cartridge filters showed lower penetration values for different size nanoparticles than the N100 FFRs. The results indicate that a mechanical filter would offer a relatively higher filtration performance for nanoparticles than an electrostatic counterpart rated for the same filter efficiency. Overall, the results obtained in the study suggest that MPPS should be considered as a key factor in the development of respirator standards and recommendations for protection against nanoparticles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23927008     DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2013.818229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  4 in total

1.  A comparison of performance metrics for cloth masks as source control devices for simulated cough and exhalation aerosols.

Authors:  William G Lindsley; Francoise M Blachere; Donald H Beezhold; Brandon F Law; Raymond C Derk; Justin M Hettick; Karen Woodfork; William T Goldsmith; James R Harris; Matthew G Duling; Brenda Boutin; Timothy Nurkiewicz; Theresa Boots; Jayme Coyle; John D Noti
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 4.809

Review 2.  Nebulized antibiotics in mechanically ventilated patients: a challenge for translational research from technology to clinical care.

Authors:  Stephan Ehrmann; Jean Chastre; Patrice Diot; Qin Lu
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.925

3.  Filtration efficiency of surgical sterilization fabric for respiratory protection during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Sinan Sousan; Nicole Garcia; Avian White; Jo Anne Balanay
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.303

4.  A comparison of performance metrics for cloth face masks as source control devices for simulated cough and exhalation aerosols.

Authors:  William G Lindsley; Francoise M Blachere; Donald H Beezhold; Brandon F Law; Raymond C Derk; Justin M Hettick; Karen Woodfork; William T Goldsmith; James R Harris; Matthew G Duling; Brenda Boutin; Timothy Nurkiewicz; John D Noti
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2021-02-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.