Literature DB >> 23926725

The effect of shoulder manipulation on rotator cuff integrity.

Ehud Atoun1, Lennard Funk, Stephen A Copland, Tirtza Even, Ofer Levy, Ehud Rath.   

Abstract

The use of shoulder manipulation in the treatment of frozen shoulder remains controversial. Humeral fractures and neurological damage are the risks associated with the procedure. A concern of causing a rotator cuff tear exists but the incidence of iatrogenic rotator cuff tears is not reported. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of shoulder manipulation for frozen shoulder on the integrity of the rotator cuff. In a prospective study, 32 consecutive patients (33 shoulders) with the diagnosis of frozen shoulder underwent manipulation of the shoulder under anaesthesia (MUA), 18 female and 15 males with mean age at manipulation of 503 years (range: 42-63). The average duration of symptoms before treatment was 6.2 months (range: 2-18 months). The patients were examined prior to the manipulation and at follow-up for combined shoulder range of motion, external and internal rotation and strength. All patients had an ultrasound assessment of the rotator cuff before and at 3 weeks after manipulation of the shoulder. Mean time between manipulation and last follow-up was 133 weeks. None of the patients had ultrasound findings of a rotator cuff tear, prior to the manipulation. In all patients the rotator cuff remained undamaged on ultrasound examination at 3 weeks after the procedure. The mean improvement in motion was 81.2 degrees (from 933 degrees pre-op to 174.5 degrees at last follow-up) for forward flexion; 102.6 degrees (from 68.8 degrees pre-op to 171.4 degrees at last follow-up) for abduction, 49.4 degrees (from 8.8 degrees pre-op to 58.2 degrees at last follow-up) for external rotation and 3.5 levels of internal rotation (range: 2 to 5 levels). These gains in motion were all highly significant (p < 0.0001). No fractures, dislocations or nerve palsies were observed. In this study, manipulation of the shoulder has not been associated with rotator cuff tears. If done properly the procedure appeared to be safe and to result in a marked improvement of range of movement and function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23926725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg        ISSN: 0001-6462            Impact factor:   0.500


  4 in total

1.  Manipulation under anaesthetic for frozen shoulder using Codman's paradox: a safe and early return of function.

Authors:  Oren Tsvieli; Ehud Atoun; Paolo Consigliere; Ioannis Polyzois; Joanna Walecka; Rajib Pradhan; Giorgio Ippolito; Ehud Rath; Ofer Levy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Arthroscopic capsular release versus manipulation under anaesthesia for treating frozen shoulder - a prospective randomised study.

Authors:  Silvampatti Ramasamy Sundararajan; Terence Dsouza; Ramakanth Rajagopalakrishnan; Pushpa Bt; Palanisamy Arumugam; Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.479

3.  Translational manipulation under anesthesia for patients with frozen shoulder: a case series study with five-year health care utilization and post-manipulative arthroscopic findings.

Authors:  Ben R Hando; Daniel I Rhon; Robert E Boyles; Julie M Whitman; Jenny L English
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2017-02-16

4.  Manipulation under anesthesia versus physiotherapy treatment in stage two of a frozen shoulder: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tim Kraal; Bertram The; Ronald Boer; M P van den Borne; Koen Koenraadt; Pjotr Goossens; Denise Eygendaal
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.