Literature DB >> 23926265

The basolateral amygdala is critical for learning about neutral stimuli in the presence of danger, and the perirhinal cortex is critical in the absence of danger.

Nathan M Holmes1, Shauna L Parkes, A Simon Killcross, R Frederick Westbrook.   

Abstract

The perirhinal cortex (PRh) and basolateral amygdala (BLA) appear to mediate distinct aspects of learning and memory. Here, we used rats to investigate the involvement of the PRh and BLA in acquisition and extinction of associations between two different environmental stimuli (e.g., a tone and a light) in higher-order conditioning. When both stimuli were neutral, infusion of the GABAA, muscimol, or the NMDA receptor (NMDAR) antagonist ifenprodil into the PRh impaired associative formation. However, when one stimulus was neutral and the other was a learned danger signal, acquisition and extinction of the association between them was unaffected by manipulations targeting the PRh. Temporary inactivation of the BLA had the opposite effect: formation and extinction of an association between two stimuli was spared when both stimuli were neutral, but impaired when one stimulus was a learned danger signal. Subsequent experiments showed that the experience of fear per se shifts processing of an association between neutral stimuli from the PRh to the BLA. When training was conducted in a dangerous environment, formation and extinction of an association between neutral stimuli was impaired by BLA inactivation or NMDAR blockade in this region, but was unaffected by PRh inactivation. These double dissociations in the roles of the PRh and BLA in learning under different stimulus and environmental conditions imply that fear-induced activation of the amygdala changes how the brain processes sensory stimuli. Harmless stimuli are treated as potentially harmful, resulting in a shift from cortical to subcortical processing in the BLA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23926265      PMCID: PMC6619729          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1998-13.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  29 in total

1.  Functional inactivation of the amygdala before but not after auditory fear conditioning prevents memory formation.

Authors:  A E Wilensky; G E Schafe; J E LeDoux
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Convergent but temporally separated inputs to lateral amygdala neurons from the auditory thalamus and auditory cortex use different postsynaptic receptors: in vivo intracellular and extracellular recordings in fear conditioning pathways.

Authors:  X F Li; G E Stutzmann; J E LeDoux
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 3.  Information processing and PTSD: a review of the empirical literature.

Authors:  T C Buckley; E B Blanchard; W T Neill
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-11

Review 4.  Reciprocal connections between the amygdala and the hippocampal formation, perirhinal cortex, and postrhinal cortex in rat. A review.

Authors:  A Pitkänen; M Pikkarainen; N Nurminen; A Ylinen
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 5.  Perirhinal cortex and thalamic stimulation induces LTP in different areas of the amygdala.

Authors:  D Yaniv; G E Schafe; J E LeDoux; G Richter-Levin
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Intra-amygdala blockade of the NR2B subunit of the NMDA receptor disrupts the acquisition but not the expression of fear conditioning.

Authors:  S M Rodrigues; G E Schafe; J E LeDoux
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Perirhinal cortex projections to the amygdaloid complex and hippocampal formation in the rat.

Authors:  C J Shi; M D Cassell
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1999-04-12       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Distinct populations of NMDA receptors at subcortical and cortical inputs to principal cells of the lateral amygdala.

Authors:  M G Weisskopf; J E LeDoux
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Cells in the posterior thalamus project to both amygdala and temporal cortex: a quantitative retrograde double-labeling study in the rat.

Authors:  N N Doron; J E Ledoux
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2000-09-18       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  Lesions of the perirhinal cortex impair sensory preconditioning in rats.

Authors:  D A Nicholson; J H Freeman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Human pharmacology of positive GABA-A subtype-selective receptor modulators for the treatment of anxiety.

Authors:  Xia Chen; Joop van Gerven; Adam Cohen; Gabriel Jacobs
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 2.  Mechanisms to medicines: elucidating neural and molecular substrates of fear extinction to identify novel treatments for anxiety disorders.

Authors:  Olena Bukalo; Courtney R Pinard; Andrew Holmes
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Tbr1 haploinsufficiency impairs amygdalar axonal projections and results in cognitive abnormality.

Authors:  Tzyy-Nan Huang; Hsiu-Chun Chuang; Wen-Hsi Chou; Chiung-Ya Chen; Hsiao-Fang Wang; Shen-Ju Chou; Yi-Ping Hsueh
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-19       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Commonalities and Differences in the Substrates Underlying Consolidation of First- and Second-Order Conditioned Fear.

Authors:  Belinda P P Lay; R Frederick Westbrook; David L Glanzman; Nathan M Holmes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The Conditions under Which Consolidation of Serial-Order Conditioned Fear Requires De Novo Protein Synthesis in the Basolateral Amygdala Complex.

Authors:  Matthew J Williams-Spooner; R Frederick Westbrook; Nathan M Holmes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Anterior cingulate neurons signal neutral cue pairings during sensory preconditioning.

Authors:  Evan E Hart; Matthew P H Gardner; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Memory enhancing effects of nicotine, cocaine, and their conditioned stimuli; effects of beta-adrenergic and dopamine D2 receptor antagonists.

Authors:  Michael Wolter; Thomas Lapointe; Brett Melanson; Nana Baidoo; Travis Francis; Boyer D Winters; Francesco Leri
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Past experience shapes the neural circuits recruited for future learning.

Authors:  Melissa J Sharpe; Hannah M Batchelor; Lauren E Mueller; Matthew P H Gardner; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 28.771

Review 9.  Understanding Associative Learning Through Higher-Order Conditioning.

Authors:  Dilara Gostolupce; Belinda P P Lay; Etienne J P Maes; Mihaela D Iordanova
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 10.  Cortical Contributions to Higher-Order Conditioning: A Review of Retrosplenial Cortex Function.

Authors:  Danielle I Fournier; Han Yin Cheng; Siobhan Robinson; Travis P Todd
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.