Literature DB >> 23926238

Three-phase, contrast-enhanced, multidetector CT in the evaluation of complicated renal cysts: comparison of the postcontrast phase combination.

Mi-Hyun Kim1, Rang Yi, Kyoung-Sik Cho, Hyuck Jae Choi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiphasic multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is widely used for the assessment and diagnosis of complicated renal cysts.
PURPOSE: To determine the optimal combination of postcontrast phases of MDCT for the evaluation of complicated renal cysts.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 164 renal cysts with pathology confirmation or follow-up >2 years, the Bosniak category was recorded by two radiologists in consensus. They reviewed the MDCT images during three interpretation sessions. In the first session, the radiologists evaluated two phases of images (unenhanced and corticomedullary phases), while during the second session, they evaluated two phases of images (unenhanced and parenchymal phases), and in the third session, they evaluated all three phases of images (unenhanced, corticomedullary, and parenchymal phases). The diagnostic accuracy for evaluating renal cysts was compared in each session using receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) analysis.
RESULTS: There were 106 benign renal cysts and 58 malignant renal cysts. The areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) of the second and third sessions were greater than that of the first session (P < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the first session were 74%, 88%, 77%, and 86%, respectively, and those of the second session were 90%, 85%, 77%, and 94%, respectively. The values of the third session were identical to those of the second session.
CONCLUSION: Unenhanced and parenchymal phase CT scans are sufficient for differentiating malignant from benign renal cysts and there was no additional value by adding the corticomedullary phase to the combination of unenhanced and parenchymal phase CT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; Urinary; adults; cysts; kidney

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23926238     DOI: 10.1177/0284185113495837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  4 in total

1.  CUA guideline on the management of cystic renal lesions.

Authors:  Patrick O Richard; Philippe D Violette; Michael A S Jewett; Frederic Pouliot; Michael Leveridge; Alan So; Thomas F Whelan; Ricardo Rendon; Antonio Finelli
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Abdominal CT manifestations of adverse events to immunotherapy: a primer for radiologists.

Authors:  Ali Pourvaziri; Anushri Parakh; Pierpaolo Biondetti; Dushyant Sahani; Avinash Kambadakone
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09

Review 3.  Malignancy rates and diagnostic performance of the Bosniak classification for the diagnosis of cystic renal lesions in computed tomography - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sabina Sevcenco; Claudio Spick; Thomas H Helbich; Gertraud Heinz; Shahrokh F Shariat; Hans C Klingler; Michael Rauchenwald; Pascal A Baltzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography and Contrast-Enhanced CT in the Diagnosis of Malignant Renal Cystic Lesions: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dong Lan; Hong-Chen Qu; Ning Li; Xing-Wang Zhu; Yi-Li Liu; Chun-Lai Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.