Literature DB >> 23926207

Effects of visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure on macrovascular and microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the ADVANCE trial.

Jun Hata1, Hisatomi Arima, Peter M Rothwell, Mark Woodward, Sophia Zoungas, Craig Anderson, Anushka Patel, Bruce Neal, Paul Glasziou, Pavel Hamet, Giuseppe Mancia, Neil Poulter, Bryan Williams, Stephen Macmahon, John Chalmers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and maximum SBP are predictors of cardiovascular disease. However, it remains uncertain whether these parameters predict the risks of macrovascular and microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) was a factorial randomized controlled trial of blood pressure lowering and blood glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The present analysis included 8811 patients without major macrovascular and microvascular events or death during the first 24 months after randomization. SBP variability (defined as standard deviation) and maximum SBP were determined during the first 24 months after randomization. During a median 2.4 years of follow-up from the 24-month visit, 407 major macrovascular (myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death) and 476 microvascular (new or worsening nephropathy or retinopathy) events were observed. The association of major macrovascular and microvascular events with SBP variability was continuous even after adjustment for mean SBP and other confounding factors (both P<0.05 for trend). Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for the highest tenth of SBP variability were 1.54 (0.99-2.39) for macrovascular events and 1.84 (1.19-2.84) for microvascular events in comparison with the lowest tenth. For maximum SBP, hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for the highest tenth were 3.64 (1.73-7.66) and 2.18 (1.04-4.58), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Visit-to-visit variability in SBP and maximum SBP were independent risk factors for macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure; diabetes mellitus, type 2; diabetic nephropathies; myocardial infarction; stroke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23926207     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  64 in total

1.  Circulating MiRNA biomarkers serve as a fingerprint for diabetic atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Jing-Yun Zhang; Ying-Lan Gong; Chun-Jun Li; Qi Qi; Qiu-Mei Zhang; De-Min Yu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Visit-to-visit Systolic Blood Pressure Variability and Stroke Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Han Wang; Min Li; Shu-Hua Xie; Ye-Tong Oyang; Min Yin; Bing Bao; Zhi-Ying Chen; Xiao-Ping Yin
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-14

3.  Visit-to-Visit Variability of BP and CKD Outcomes: Results from the ALLHAT.

Authors:  Jeff Whittle; Amy I Lynch; Rikki M Tanner; Lara M Simpson; Barry R Davis; Mahboob Rahman; Paul K Whelton; Suzanne Oparil; Paul Muntner
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Increasing SBP variability is associated with an increased risk of developing incident diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Meghan B Brennan; Marylou Guihan; Elly Budiman-Mak; Hyojung Kang; Jennifer M Lobo; Bryn L Sutherland; Nicholas Emanuele; Elbert S Huang; Min-Woong Sohn
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.844

Review 5.  Visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure and cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Keith M Diaz; Rikki M Tanner; Louise Falzon; Emily B Levitan; Kristi Reynolds; Daichi Shimbo; Paul Muntner
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 6.  Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: Have all risk factors the same strength?

Authors:  Iciar Martín-Timón; Cristina Sevillano-Collantes; Amparo Segura-Galindo; Francisco Javier Del Cañizo-Gómez
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2014-08-15

7.  Blood Pressure Variability and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Prior Stroke: A Secondary Analysis of PRoFESS.

Authors:  Adam de Havenon; Nora F Fino; Brian Johnson; Ka-Ho Wong; Jennifer J Majersik; David Tirschwell; Natalia Rost
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Finding a Signal in the Noise.

Authors:  Ciaran J McMullan; John P Forman
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Association Between Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability in Early Adulthood and Myocardial Structure and Function in Later Life.

Authors:  Chike C Nwabuo; Yuichiro Yano; Henrique T Moreira; Duke Appiah; Henrique D Vasconcellos; Queen N Aghaji; Anthony Viera; Jamal S Rana; Ravi V Shah; Venkatesh L Murthy; Norrina B Allen; Pamela J Schreiner; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; João A C Lima
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 14.676

10.  Visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure and death, end-stage renal disease, and cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Tara I Chang; Grace H Tabada; Jingrong Yang; Thida C Tan; Alan S Go
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.844

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.