J Sohn1, K A Do2, S Liu1, H Chen1, G B Mills3, G N Hortobagyi1, F Meric-Bernstam4, A M Gonzalez-Angulo5. 1. Departments of Breast Medical Oncology. 2. Biostatistics. 3. Systems Biology. 4. Surgical Oncology (FMB), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA. 5. Departments of Breast Medical Oncology; Systems Biology. Electronic address: agonzalez@mdanderson.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In this study, we used functional proteomics to determine the molecular characteristics of residual triple receptor-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients after neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (NCT) and their relationship with patient outcomes in order to identify potential targets for therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Protein was extracted from 54 residual TNBCs, and 76 proteins related to breast cancer signaling were measured by reverse phase protein arrays (RPPAs). Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were fitted for each protein. Survival outcomes were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. Training and cross validation were carried out. The coefficients estimated from the multivariable Cox model were used to calculate a risk score (RS) for each sample. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis using the top 25 proteins from univariable analysis at a false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.3 showed that AKT, IGFBP2, LKB1, S6 and Stathmin were predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS). The cross-validation model was reproducible. The RS model calculated based on the multivariable analysis was -1.1086 × AKT + 0.2501 × IGFBP2 - 0.6745 × LKB1+1.0692 × S6 + 1.4086 × stathmin with a corresponding area under the curve, AUC = 0.856. The RS was an independent predictor of RFS (HR = 3.28, 95%CI = 2.07-5.20, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found a five-protein model that independently predicted RFS risk in patients with residual TNBC disease. The PI3 K pathway may represent potential therapeutic targets in this resistant disease.
BACKGROUND: In this study, we used functional proteomics to determine the molecular characteristics of residual triple receptor-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients after neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (NCT) and their relationship with patient outcomes in order to identify potential targets for therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Protein was extracted from 54 residual TNBCs, and 76 proteins related to breast cancer signaling were measured by reverse phase protein arrays (RPPAs). Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were fitted for each protein. Survival outcomes were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. Training and cross validation were carried out. The coefficients estimated from the multivariable Cox model were used to calculate a risk score (RS) for each sample. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis using the top 25 proteins from univariable analysis at a false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.3 showed that AKT, IGFBP2, LKB1, S6 and Stathmin were predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS). The cross-validation model was reproducible. The RS model calculated based on the multivariable analysis was -1.1086 × AKT + 0.2501 × IGFBP2 - 0.6745 × LKB1+1.0692 × S6 + 1.4086 × stathmin with a corresponding area under the curve, AUC = 0.856. The RS was an independent predictor of RFS (HR = 3.28, 95%CI = 2.07-5.20, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found a five-protein model that independently predicted RFS risk in patients with residual TNBC disease. The PI3 K pathway may represent potential therapeutic targets in this resistant disease.
Entities:
Keywords:
molecular characterization; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; residual disease; resistance; triple receptor-negative breast cancer
Authors: Prasanth Ganesan; Stacy Moulder; J Jack Lee; Filip Janku; Vicente Valero; Ralph G Zinner; Aung Naing; Siqing Fu; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; David Hong; Bettzy Stephen; Philip Stephens; Roman Yelensky; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Razelle Kurzrock; Jennifer J Wheler Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2014-09-24 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Arvind M Shinde; Jing Zhai; Kim Wai Yu; Paul Frankel; John H Yim; Thehang Luu; Laura Kruper; Courtney Vito; Sally Shaw; Nayana L Vora; Michele Kirschenbaum; George Somlo Journal: Breast Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 4.380
Authors: Steven W Yau; Walid J Azar; Matthew A Sabin; George A Werther; Vincenzo C Russo Journal: J Cell Commun Signal Date: 2015-01-25 Impact factor: 5.782
Authors: Mariana Chavez-Macgregor; Shuying Liu; Debora De Melo-Gagliato; Huiqin Chen; Kim-Anh Do; Lajos Pusztai; W Fraser Symmans; Lakshmy Nair; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Gordon B Mills; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2013-12-02 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: A M Gonzalez-Angulo; A Akcakanat; S Liu; M C Green; J L Murray; H Chen; S L Palla; K B Koenig; A M Brewster; V Valero; N K Ibrahim; S Moulder-Thompson; J K Litton; E Tarco; J Moore; P Flores; D Crawford; M J Dryden; W F Symmans; A Sahin; S H Giordano; L Pusztai; K-A Do; G B Mills; G N Hortobagyi; F Meric-Bernstam Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-03-24 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Marta Téllez-Gabriel; Irene Arroyo-Solera; Xavier León; Alberto Gallardo; Montserrat López; Maria V Céspedes; Isolda Casanova; Antonio López-Pousa; Miquel Quer; Maria A Mangues; Agustí Barnadas; Ramón Mangues; Miguel A Pavón Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2013-10-31 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Fares Al-Ejeh; Mariska Miranda; Wei Shi; Peter T Simpson; Sarah Song; Ana Cristina Vargas; Jodi M Saunus; Chanel E Smart; Mythily Mariasegaram; Adrian P Wiegmans; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Sunil R Lakhani; Kum Kum Khanna Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2014-05-30