Literature DB >> 23925961

Predicting institutional violence in offenders with intellectual disabilities: the predictive efficacy of the VRAG and the HCR-20.

Suzanne Fitzgerald1, Nicola S Gray, Regi T Alexander, Ruth Bagshaw, Paul Chesterman, Phillip Huckle, Susan K Jones, John Taylor, Tegwyn Williams, Robert J Snowden.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a developing evidence base to support the use of risk assessment instruments in offenders with intellectual disability (ID). The aim of this study was to try to develop this literature with the inclusion of a control group of mentally disordered offenders without an ID, using the HCR-20 and VRAG.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The VRAG and the HCR-20 were completed for a group of offenders with an ID (n = 25) and a control group (n = 45), in four medium-secure units across the UK. The outcome measure was physical aggression measured over 6 months.
RESULTS: Both instruments consistently produced large effect sizes predicting any physical aggression and severe physical aggression. The structured clinical judgement based on the HCR-20 was especially good.
CONCLUSIONS: The HCR-20 and the VRAG have excellent predictive efficacy in offenders with an ID. A structured clinical judgement based on the HCR-20 was especially predictive.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  actuarial measures; intellectual disabilities; risk assessment; structured clinical judgement

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23925961     DOI: 10.1111/jar.12032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Res Intellect Disabil        ISSN: 1360-2322


  6 in total

1.  Predicting hospital aggression in secure psychiatric care.

Authors:  Jane L Ireland; Lee J Priday; Carol A Ireland; Simon Chu; Jennifer Kilcoyne; Caroline Mulligan
Journal:  BJPsych Open       Date:  2016-02-19

Review 2.  Measuring relational security in forensic mental health services.

Authors:  Verity Chester; Regi T Alexander; Wendy Morgan
Journal:  BJPsych Bull       Date:  2017-12

Review 3.  A systematic review and synthesis of outcome domains for use within forensic services for people with intellectual disabilities.

Authors:  Catrin Morrissey; Peter E Langdon; Nicole Geach; Verity Chester; Michael Ferriter; William R Lindsay; Jane McCarthy; John Devapriam; Dawn-Marie Walker; Conor Duggan; Regi Alexander
Journal:  BJPsych Open       Date:  2017-02-13

4.  Long-stay patients with and without intellectual disability in forensic psychiatric settings: comparison of characteristics and needs.

Authors:  Verity Chester; Birgit Völlm; Samuel Tromans; Chaya Kapugama; Regi T Alexander
Journal:  BJPsych Open       Date:  2018-06-28

5.  Clinical, Demographic, and Criminal Behavior Characteristics of Patients With Intellectual Disabilities in a Canadian Forensic Program.

Authors:  Ipsita Ray; Alexander I F Simpson; Roland M Jones; Kristina Shatokhina; Anupam Thakur; Benoit H Mulsant
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  Criminal recidivism in offenders with and without intellectual disability sentenced to forensic psychiatric care in Sweden-A 17-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Hanna Edberg; Qi Chen; Peter Andiné; Henrik Larsson; Tatja Hirvikoski
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 5.435

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.