Literature DB >> 23925837

Density-mediated carry-over effects explain variation in breeding output across time in a seasonal population.

Gustavo S Betini1, Cortland K Griswold, D Ryan Norris.   

Abstract

In seasonal environments, where density dependence can operate throughout the annual cycle, vital rates are typically considered to be a function of the number of individuals at the beginning of each season. However, variation in density in the previous season could also cause surviving individuals to be in poor physiological condition, which could carry over to influence individual success in the following season. We examine this hypothesis using replicated populations of Drosophila melanogaster, the common fruitfly, over 23 non-overlapping generations with distinct breeding and non-breeding seasons. We found that the density at the beginning of the non-breeding season negatively affected the fresh weight of individuals that survived the non-breeding season and resulted in a 25% decrease in per capita breeding output among those that survived to the next season to breed. At the population level, per capita breeding output was best explained by a model that incorporated density at the beginning of the previous non-breeding season (carry-over effect, COE) and density at the beginning of the breeding season. Our results support the idea that density-mediated COEs are critical for understanding population dynamics in seasonal environments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila; density-dependence; seasonality

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23925837      PMCID: PMC3971703          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  5 in total

Review 1.  Carry-over effects as drivers of fitness differences in animals.

Authors:  Xavier A Harrison; Jonathan D Blount; Richard Inger; D Ryan Norris; Stuart Bearhop
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 2.  When density dependence is not instantaneous: theoretical developments and management implications.

Authors:  Irja I Ratikainen; Jennifer A Gill; Tómas G Gunnarsson; William J Sutherland; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2007-11-03       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 3.  When does greater mortality increase population size? The long history and diverse mechanisms underlying the hydra effect.

Authors:  Peter A Abrams
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-02-08       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  The ecological determinants of population growth in a Drosophila culture; larval and pupal survival.

Authors:  J H SANG
Journal:  Physiol Zool       Date:  1949-07

5.  Carry-over effects, sequential density dependence and the dynamics of populations in a seasonal environment.

Authors:  Gustavo S Betini; Cortland K Griswold; D Ryan Norris
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 5.349

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Fear creates an Allee effect: experimental evidence from seasonal populations.

Authors:  Kyle H Elliott; Gustavo S Betini; D Ryan Norris
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A fitness trade-off between seasons causes multigenerational cycles in phenotype and population size.

Authors:  Gustavo S Betini; Andrew G McAdam; Cortland K Griswold; D Ryan Norris
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 8.140

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.