Literature DB >> 23925396

Sildenafil citrate in the treatment of pain in primary dysmenorrhea: a randomized controlled trial.

R Dmitrovic1, A R Kunselman, R S Legro.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Is a vaginal preparation of sildenafil citrate capable of alleviating acute menstrual pain in patients with primary dysmenorrhea (PD)? SUMMARY ANSWER: A vaginal preparation of sildenafil citrate is capable of alleviating acute menstrual pain in patients with PD with no observed adverse effects. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Oral preparations of nitric oxide (NO) donor drugs augment relaxant effects of NO on myometrial cells, reverse the vasoconstriction caused by prostaglandins and successfully alleviate pain, but the incidence of side effects is too high for routine clinical use. Sildenafil citrate inhibits type 5-specific phosphodiesterase (PDE5), thus preventing the degradation of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) in the muscle and augmenting the vasodilatory effects of NO. Therefore, by inhibiting PDE5, the tissue remains relaxed and more blood can circulate through. It has been used previously in a vaginal form with no observed side effects, and it enhances endometrial blood flow. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial comparing vaginal preparation of sildenafil citrate (100 mg single dose) to a placebo in 62 PD patients at the time of painful menstruation was conducted. The primary outcome was total pain relief over 4 consecutive hours (TOPAR4) comparing sildenafil citrate to placebo, where higher TOPAR4 scores represent better pain relief. Secondary outcomes were pain relief as measured by the visual analog scale (VAS) and uterine artery pulsatility index (PI). Subjects were recruited from December 2007 to January 2011. The trial was stopped due to closeout of the funding for the study. PARTICIPANTS, SETTINGS,
METHODS: Participants were women in good health, were aged 18-35 years and suffered from moderate to severe PD. They were randomized to either vaginal placebo or 100 mg vaginal sildenafil citrate in a 1:1 ratio using random permuted blocks having a block size of 4. At baseline and 1, 2, 3, and 4 h post-treatment, patients were asked to provide assessment of their degree of pain using two scales: (i) pain on the 5-level ordinal scale used for TOPAR4 calculation and (ii) pain level on the VAS. The study ended 4 h after treatment initiation. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Twenty-five subjects completed the study. Using the TOPAR4 score, the sildenafil citrate group had significantly better pain relief compared with the placebo group [mean (SD): 11.9 (3.2) versus 6.4 (2.1), respectively; difference in means = 5.3; 95% CI: (2.9,7.6); P < 0.001)]. On the VAS, sildenafil citrate provided better pain relief than placebo at each time point. At the 2-h time point, the PI was significantly lower in the sildenafil citrate group compared with the placebo group [mean (SD): 1.6 (0.6) versus 2.3 (0.5), respectively; difference in means = -0.7; 95% CI: (-1.2, -0.1); P = 0.01)]. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Since we did not meet our sample size due to the loss of funding and could not confirm our primary hypothesis, larger studies of longer duration, likely multi-center, are needed to confirm the findings from this study. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: A number of medications have been investigated to improve the treatment options for PD, but most have proven unsuccessful or to have an unfavorable risk/benefit ratio. Since PD is a condition that most women suffer from and seek treatment for at some point in their lives, our study offers hope that vaginal sildenafil citrate is a safe and effective option for patients who do not desire or are unresponsive to treatments now available on the market. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: Funding for this study was provided by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants RO3 TW007438 and K24 HD01476. The authors report no relevant conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00123162 (Clinical trials.gov).

Entities:  

Keywords:  primary dysmenorrhea; sildenafil citrate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23925396      PMCID: PMC3795469          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  39 in total

1.  A comparison of rofecoxib versus celecoxib in treating pain after dental surgery: a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-comparator-controlled, parallel-group, single-dose study using the dental impaction pain model.

Authors:  Kerstin Malmstrom; James R Fricke; Paul Kotey; Barbara Kress; Briggs Morrison
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.393

2.  Effect of vaginal sildenafil on the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) after multiple IVF failures attributed to poor endometrial development.

Authors:  Geoffrey Sher; Jeffrey D Fisch
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Dynamics and significance of placebo response in primary dysmenorrhea.

Authors:  L Fedele; M Marchini; B Acaia; U Garagiola; M Tiengo
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Development of human and rabbit vaginal smooth muscle cell cultures: effects of vasoactive agents on intracellular levels of cyclic nucleotides.

Authors:  A Traish; R B Moreland; Y H Huang; N N Kim; J Berman; I Goldstein
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol Res Commun       Date:  1999-08

5.  Vaginal sildenafil (Viagra): a preliminary report of a novel method to improve uterine artery blood flow and endometrial development in patients undergoing IVF.

Authors:  G Sher; J D Fisch
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Vaginal bromocriptine: pharmacology and effect on serum prolactin in normal women.

Authors:  M Vermesh; G T Fossum; O A Kletzky
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 7.  Vascularization of human endometrium. Uterine blood flow in healthy condition and in primary dysmenorrhoea.

Authors:  M Akerlund
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1994-09-30       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 8.  Placebo interventions for all clinical conditions.

Authors:  A Hróbjartsson; P C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

9.  Double-blind parallel comparison of single oral doses of ketoprofen, codeine, and placebo in patients with moderate to severe dental pain.

Authors:  D Mehlisch; L Frakes; M B Cavaliere; M Gelman
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.126

10.  Anti-TNF-alpha treatment for deep endometriosis-associated pain: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  P R Koninckx; M Craessaerts; D Timmerman; F Cornillie; S Kennedy
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug resistance in dysmenorrhea: epidemiology, causes, and treatment.

Authors:  Folabomi A Oladosu; Frank F Tu; Kevin M Hellman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Effect of Menstrugole on primary dysmenorrhea: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Fatemeh Shobeiri; Sasan Nazari; Saman Nazari; Ensiyeh Jenabi; Arezoo Shayan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2018-10-11

3.  An update and systematic review on the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea.

Authors:  Maedeh Sharghi; Shabnam Malekpour Mansurkhani; Damoon Ashtary Larky; Wesam Kooti; Mehdi Niksefat; Mohammad Firoozbakht; Masoud Behzadifar; Milad Azami; Karo Servatyari; Leila Jouybari
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2019-01-31

4.  The effect of bee prepolis on primary dysmenorrhea: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ensiyeh Jenabi; Bita Fereidooni; Manoochehr Karami; Seyedeh Zahra Masoumi; Mahdi Safari; Salman Khazaei
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2019-07-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.