Literature DB >> 23924395

Turkish version of the painDETECT questionnaire in the assessment of neuropathic pain: a validity and reliability study.

Hakan Alkan1, Fusun Ardic, Cagdas Erdogan, Fusun Sahin, Ayse Sarsan, Gulin Findikoglu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a Turkish version of the painDETECT questionnaire (PD-Q) and assess its reliability and validity.
METHODS: Two hundred and forty patients who were diagnosed by expert pain physicians in daily clinical practice and classified as having either neuropathic, nociceptive, or mixed pain for at least 3 months were enrolled in this study. After the usual translation process, the Turkish version of the PD-Q was administered to each participant twice with an interval of 48 hours. The Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS), Douleur Neuropathique en 4 questions (DN4) and a pain visual analog scale were assessed along with the PD-Q. Chronbach's α was calculated to evaluate internal consistency of the PD-Q. Intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to examine test-retest reliability. Convergent validity was assessed by correlating the scale with LANSS and DN4. Discriminant statistics-sensitivity, specificity, Youden index, positive predictive value, negative predictive value-were also assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 240 patients with chronic pain, 80 patients in each neuropathic, nociceptive, and mixed pain group, were included in this study. Mean age of the patients was 54.1 years, and majority of the patients were female (52.9%). Chronbach's α of the Turkish version of the PD-Q was 0.81. The test-retest reliability of the Turkish version of the PD-Q was determined as 0.98 for the total score and ranged from 0.86 to 0.99 for individual items. The Turkish version of the PD-Q was possitively and significantly corralated with LANSS (r 0.89, P < 0.001) and DN4 (r 0.82, P < 0.001). When the two cutoff values in the original version were used, sensitivity was found 77.5% for a cutoff value ≤19, and specificity was 82.5%. Sensitivity and specificity were 90% and 67.5%, respectively, for the other cutoff value ≤12. Scores ≤12 represents a negative predictive value = 87%, and scores 19≤ represents a positive predictive value = 82%. When mixed pain patients were included in the neuropathic pain group, discriminant values were reduced as expected.
CONCLUSIONS: The Turkish version of the PD-Q is a reliable and valid scale to be used to determine neuropathic component of chronic pain in Turkish patients. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic Diseases; Neuropathic Pain; Pain Assessment; Questionnaires

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23924395     DOI: 10.1111/pme.12222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Med        ISSN: 1526-2375            Impact factor:   3.750


  19 in total

Review 1.  A Review of Management Strategies for Nociceptive and Neuropathic Ocular Surface Pain.

Authors:  Harrison Dermer; Daniella Lent-Schochet; Despoina Theotoka; Christian Paba; Abdullah A Cheema; Ryan S Kim; Anat Galor
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Tracking Pain in Resting State Networks in Patients with Hereditary and Diabetic Neuropathy.

Authors:  Aslıhan Taşkiran Sağ; Arzu Ceylan Has; Neşe Öztekin; Çağrı Mesut Temuçin; Kader Karli Oğuz
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 1.339

3.  Is Radial Deviation of Wrist Related With Median Nerve Swelling in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis? A Radiographic, Ultrasonographic, and Electroneuromyographic Study.

Authors:  Başak Mansiz-Kaplan; Seçil Pervane-Vural; Ömer Faruk Çelik; F Figen F Figen Ayhan
Journal:  Arch Rheumatol       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 1.472

4.  The Modified painDETECT Questionnaire for Patients with Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis: Translation into Dutch, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Reliability Assessment.

Authors:  Wietske Rienstra; Tim Blikman; Frans B Mensink; Jos J A M van Raay; Baukje Dijkstra; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Martin Stevens; Inge van den Akker-Scheek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Association of neuropathic pain with ultrasonographic measurements of femoral cartilage thickness and clinical parameters in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Nilgün Mesci; Erkan Mesci; Duygu Geler Külcü
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-08-31

6.  Usefulness of four commonly used neuropathic pain screening questionnaires in patients with chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Kapil Gudala; Babita Ghai; Dipika Bansal
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2016-12-30

7.  Matrix stimulation in cancer pain: Methodology, safety and effectiveness.

Authors:  M Mücke; M Tils; R Conrad; D Kravchenko; H Cuhls; L Radbruch; M Marinova; V Peuckmann-Post; R Rolke
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.931

8.  Testing the validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the painDETECT questionnaire in the assessment of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Amani Abu-Shaheen; Shehu Yousef; Muhammad Riaz; Abdullah Nofal; Isamme AlFayyad; Sarfaraz Khan; Humariya Heena
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Is There a Possible Neuropathic Pain Component in Knee Osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Cemile Sevgi Polat; Asuman Doğan; Didem Sezgin Özcan; Belma Füsun Köseoğlu; Sinem Koçer Akselim
Journal:  Arch Rheumatol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 1.472

10.  Turkish version of the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument in the assessment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a validity and reliability study.

Authors:  Serdar Kaymaz; Hakan Alkan; Ugur Karasu; Veli Çobankara
Journal:  Diabetol Int       Date:  2020-02-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.