Literature DB >> 23922276

Investigation of the optimal timing for chondrogenic priming of MSCs to enhance osteogenic differentiation in vitro as a bone tissue engineering strategy.

F E Freeman1,2, M G Haugh1,2, L M McNamara1,2.   

Abstract

Recent in vitro tissue engineering approaches have shown that chondrogenic priming of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can have a positive effect on osteogenesis in vivo. However, whether chondrogenic priming is an effective in vitro bone regeneration strategy is not yet known. In particular, the appropriate timing for chondrogenic priming in vitro is unknown albeit that in vivo cartilage formation persists for a specific period before bone formation. The objective of this study is to determine the optimum time for chondrogenic priming of MSCs to enhance osteogenic differentiation by MSCs in vitro. Pellets derived from murine and human MSCs were cultured in six different media groups: two control groups (chondrogenic and osteogenic) and four chondrogenic priming groups (10, 14, 21 and 28 days priming). Biochemical analyses (Hoechst, sulfate glycosaminoglycan (sGAG), Alkaline Phosphate (ALP), calcium), histology (Alcian Blue, Alizarin Red) and immunohistochemistry (collagen types I, II and X) were performed on the samples at specific times. Our results show that after 49 days the highest amount of sGAG production occurred in MSCs chondrogenically primed for 21 days and 28 days. Moreover we found that chondrogenic priming of MSCs in vitro for specific amounts of time (14 days, 21 days) can have optimum influence on their mineralization capacity and can produce a construct that is mineralized throughout the core. Determining the optimum time for chondrogenic priming to enhance osteogenic differentiation in vitro provides information that might lead to a novel regenerative treatment for large bone defects, as well as addressing the major limitation of core degradation and construct failure.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chondrogenesis; chondrogenic priming; endochondral ossification; mesenchymal stem cells; osteogenesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23922276     DOI: 10.1002/term.1793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med        ISSN: 1932-6254            Impact factor:   3.963


  15 in total

1.  Chondrogenic, hypertrophic, and osteochondral differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells on three-dimensionally woven scaffolds.

Authors:  Benjamin L Larson; Sarah N Yu; Hyoungshin Park; Bradley T Estes; Franklin T Moutos; Cameron J Bloomquist; Patrick B Wu; Jean F Welter; Robert Langer; Farshid Guilak; Lisa E Freed
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.963

2.  Dual non-viral gene delivery from microparticles within 3D high-density stem cell constructs for enhanced bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Alexandra McMillan; Minh Khanh Nguyen; Tomas Gonzalez-Fernandez; Peilin Ge; Xiaohua Yu; William L Murphy; Daniel J Kelly; Eben Alsberg
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells by Mimicking the Cellular Niche of the Endochondral Template.

Authors:  Fiona E Freeman; Hazel Y Stevens; Peter Owens; Robert E Guldberg; Laoise M McNamara
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Evaluation of an Engineered Hybrid Matrix for Bone Regeneration via Endochondral Ossification.

Authors:  Paiyz E Mikael; Aleksandra A Golebiowska; Xiaonan Xin; David W Rowe; Syam P Nukavarapu
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Developmentally inspired programming of adult human mesenchymal stromal cells toward stable chondrogenesis.

Authors:  Paola Occhetta; Sebastien Pigeot; Marco Rasponi; Boris Dasen; Arne Mehrkens; Thomas Ullrich; Ina Kramer; Sabine Guth-Gundel; Andrea Barbero; Ivan Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The role of adhesion junctions in the biomechanical behaviour and osteogenic differentiation of 3D mesenchymal stem cell spheroids.

Authors:  F E Griffin; J Schiavi; T C McDevitt; J P McGarry; L M McNamara
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Hydrogel microspheres for spatiotemporally controlled delivery of RNA and silencing gene expression within scaffold-free tissue engineered constructs.

Authors:  Alexandra McMillan; Minh Khanh Nguyen; Cong Truc Huynh; Samantha M Sarett; Peilin Ge; Melanie Chetverikova; Kien Nguyen; David Grosh; Craig L Duvall; Eben Alsberg
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 8.  Coupling Osteogenesis and Vasculogenesis in Engineered Orthopedic Tissues.

Authors:  Nicholas G Schott; Nicole E Friend; Jan P Stegemann
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 7.376

9.  Differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into chondrocytes after short term culture in alkaline medium.

Authors:  Farshad Homayouni Moghadam; Tahereh Tayebi; Maryam Dehghan; Gilda Eslami; Hamid Nadri; Alireza Moradi; Hassanali Vahedian-Ardakani; Kazem Barzegar
Journal:  Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res       Date:  2014-10-01

10.  Effects of in vitro endochondral priming and pre-vascularisation of human MSC cellular aggregates in vivo.

Authors:  Fiona E Freeman; Ashley B Allen; Hazel Y Stevens; Robert E Guldberg; Laoise M McNamara
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 6.832

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.