Literature DB >> 23922227

Cost-effectiveness of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization strategies including plerixafor in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients.

Aleš Tichopád1, Veronika Vítová, Zdeněk Kořístek, Daniel Lysák.   

Abstract

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are preferred source of hematopoietic stem cells for autologous transplantation. Mobilization of PBSCs using chemotherapy and/or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) however fails in around 20%. Combining G-CSF with plerixafor increases the mobilizations success. We compared cost-effectiveness of following schemes: the use of plerixafor "on demand" (POD) during the first mobilization in all patients with inadequate response, the remobilization with plerixafor following failure of the first standard mobilization (SSP), and the standard (re)mobilization scheme without plerixafor (SSNP). Decision tree models populated with data from a first-of-a-kind patient registry in six Czech centers (n = 93) were built to compare clinical benefits and direct costs from the payer's perspective. The success rates and costs for POD, SSP and SSNP mobilizations were; 94.9%, $7,197; 94.7%, $8,049; 84.7%, $5,991, respectively. The direct cost per successfully treated patient was $7,586, $8,501, and $7,077, respectively. The cost of re-mobilization of a poor mobilizer was $5,808 with G-CSF only and $16,755 if plerixafor was added. The total cost of plerixafor "on-demand" in the sub-cohort of poor mobilizers was $17,120. Generally, plerixafor improves the mobilization success by 10% and allows an additional patient to be successfully mobilized for incremental $11,803. Plerixafor is better and cheaper if used "on demand" than within a subsequent remobilization.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cost-effectiveness; mobilization; on demand; plerixafor; poor mobilizers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23922227     DOI: 10.1002/jca.21290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Apher        ISSN: 0733-2459            Impact factor:   2.821


  3 in total

1.  Plerixafor in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: a German analysis of time, effort and costs.

Authors:  Kai Hübel; H Ostermann; Bertram Glaß; Richard Noppeney; Florian Kron; Anna Kron; Gary Milkovich; Mohamad Mohty
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  Chemotherapy-based versus chemotherapy-free stem cell mobilization (± plerixafor) in multiple myeloma patients: an Italian cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Luca Castagna; Francesco Lanza; Daniele Laszlo; Giuseppe Milone; Luca Pierelli; Riccardo Saccardi; Carlo Lazzaro
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 5.174

3.  Machine learning-based scoring models to predict hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in allogeneic donors.

Authors:  Jingyu Xiang; Min Shi; Mark A Fiala; Feng Gao; Michael P Rettig; Geoffrey L Uy; Mark A Schroeder; Katherine N Weilbaecher; Keith E Stockerl-Goldstein; Shamim Mollah; John F DiPersio
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2022-04-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.