| Literature DB >> 23922106 |
B-H Kuang1, M-Q Zhang, L-H Xu, L-J Hu, H-B Wang, W-F Zhao, Y Du, X Zhang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Our previous study revealed that proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 (Pyk2) is implicated in both anchorage-independent growth and anoikis resistance in lung cancer cells. This study aims to explore the expression and clinical significance of Pyk2 and its phosphorylated forms in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23922106 PMCID: PMC3778294 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.439
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Figure 1Flowchart of this study.
Figure 2Expression of Pyk2 and Pyk2[pY881] is elevated in fresh frozen primary NSCLC tissues compared with noncancerous tissues adjacent to cancer lesions. (A) Relative expression of Pyk2 mRNA in paired fresh frozen primary NSCLC tissues (T) and noncancerous tissues (N) from the same patient by real-time RT–PCR analysis. As an internal control, GAPDH was used. Reactions were performed in triplicate in three independent experiments. (B) Expression of Pyk2 and Pyk2[pY881] protein in paired fresh frozen primary NSCLC tissues (T) and noncancerous tissues (N) from the same patient by western blotting analysis. As an internal reference, GAPDH was used.
Correlation between Pyk2, Pyk2[pY881] expression and clinicopathologic characteristics of NSCLC patients
| Male | 38 (45.2) | 46 (54.8) | 0.981 | 30 (35.7) | 54 (64.3) | 0.187 |
| Female | 20 (45.5) | 24 (54.5) | | 21 (47.7) | 23 (52.3) | |
| ≦60 | 29 (42.6) | 39 (57.4) | 0.519 | 26 (38.2) | 42 (61.8) | 0.692 |
| >60 | 29 (48.3) | 31 (51.7) | | 25 (41.7) | 35 (58.3) | |
| No | 29 (47.5) | 32 (52.5) | 0.629 | 28 (45.9) | 33 (54.1) | 0.182 |
| Yes | 29 (43.3) | 38 (56.7) | | 23 (34.3) | 44 (65.7) | |
| − | 30 (49.2) | 31 (50.8) | 0.381 | 28 (45.9) | 33 (54.1) | 0.102 |
| + | 20 (40.8) | 29 (59.2) | | 15 (30.6) | 34 (69.4) | |
| − | 27 (45.8) | 32 (54.2) | 0.376 | 25 (42.4) | 34 (57.6) | 0.361 |
| + | 10 (35.7) | 18 (64.3) | | 9 (32.1) | 19 (67.9) | |
| − | 2 (14.3) | 12 (85.7) | 0.201 | 8 (57.1) | 6 (42.9) | 0.288 |
| + | 14 (37.8) | 23 (62.2) | | 15 (40.5) | 22 (42.9) | |
| Adenocarcinoma | 43 (47.3) | 48 (52.7) | 0.489 | 33 (36.3) | 58 (63.7) | 0.194 |
| Squamous carcinoma | 15 (40.5) | 22 (59.5) | | 18 (48.6) | 19 (51.4) | |
| Well–moderate | 31 (50.0) | 31 (50.0) | 0.302 | 33 (53.2) | 29 (46.8) | |
| Poor | 27 (40.9) | 39 (59.1) | | 18 (27.3) | 48 (72.7) | |
| T1 | 17 (53.1) | 15 (46.9) | 0.236 | 19 (59.4) | 13 (40.6) | |
| T2 | 34 (46.6) | 39 (53.4) | 24 (32.9) | 49 (67.1) | ||
| T3–T4 | 7 (30.4) | 16 (69.6) | | 8 (34.8) | 15 (65.2) | |
| N0 | 36 (55.4) | 29 (44.6) | 34 (52.3) | 31 (47.7) | ||
| N1–N3 | 22 (34.9) | 41 (65.1) | | 17 (27.0) | 46 (73.0) | |
| M0 | 55 (53.4) | 48 (46.6) | 47 (45.6) | 56 (54.7) | ||
| M1 | 3 (12.0) | 22 (88.0) | | 4 (16.0) | 21 (84.0) | |
| I | 24 (61.5) | 15 (38.5) | 24 (61.5) | 15 (38.5) | ||
| II | 19 (55.9) | 15 (44.1) | 12 (35.3) | 22 (64.7) | ||
| III | 12 (40.0) | 18 (60.0) | 11 (36.7) | 19 (63.3) | ||
| IV | 3 (12.0) | 22 (88.0) | 4 (16.0) | 21 (84.0) | ||
Abbreviations: CEA=carcinoembryonic antigen; EGFR=epidermal growth factor receptor; NSCLC=non-small-cell lung cancer; NSE=neuron-specific enolase; Pyk2=proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2.
Pyk2 low expression: score ⩽3; high expression: score ⩾4.
Two-sided P-values were calculated by Pearson's χ2 test or continuity correction to evaluate the significance of correlations. Bold print indicates statistical significance.
Pyk2[pY881] low expression: score ⩽3; high expression: score ⩾4.
CEA: −, normal (0–5 ng ml−1); +, elevated (>5 ng ml−1); 18 patients' CEA unknown.
NSE: −, normal (0–15.2 ng ml−1); +, elevated (>15.2 ng ml−1); 41 patients' NSE unknown.
EGFR: −, no EGFR mutation and amplification; +, EGFR mutation or amplification; 77 patients' EGFR unknown.
Tumour size, lymph node involvement, distant metastasis and clinical stage were classified or reclassified according to the seventh edition of the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) Staging system for Lung Cancer.
Figure 3Expression of Pyk2 in different tissues by immunohistochemical staining. (A) As can be observed, Pyk2 shows cytoplasmic staining in primary lung cancer lesions ( × 400). (B, C) Protein expression of Pyk2 is increased in primary lung cancer lesions compared with the adjacent noncancerous tissues (B × 40; C × 400). (D, E) The Pyk2 shows strong cytoplasmic staining in the corresponding metastatic lymph nodes of squamous carcinoma (D × 100; E × 400) and (F, G) metastatic brain lesions of adenocarcinoma (F × 100; G × 400).
Figure 4The Pyk2[pY881] staining in different tissues by immunohistochemical staining. (A) As can be observed, Pyk2[pY881] shows cytoplasmic staining in primary lung carcinoma lesions ( × 400). (B, C) Protein expression of Pyk2[pY881] is much higher in primary lung cancer lesions than in the adjacent noncancerous tissues (B × 40; C × 400). (D, E) The Pyk2[pY881] shows strong cytoplasmic staining in the corresponding metastatic lymph nodes of squamous carcinoma (D × 100; E × 400) and (F, G) metastatic brain lesions of adenocarcinoma (F × 100; G × 400).
Figure 5Influence of Pyk2 expression on overall survival of NSCLC patients. (A) Overall survival curves show that patients with high Pyk2 expression have short survival times by analysing 128 primary NSCLC tissues (P<0.001). (B) Patients with high Pyk2 expression show poor overall survival based on an analysis of 47 matched metastatic lymph node tissues (P=0.018). (C, D) In the squamous carcinoma subtype, the patients' overall survival demonstrates no statistically significant difference between the high and low Pyk2 expression groups (P=0.139). In the adenocarcinoma subtype, patients with high Pyk2 expression show short overall survival times (P<0.001). The Pyk2 low expression: score ⩽3; high expression: score ⩾4.
Figure 6Impact of Pyk2[pY881] expression on overall survival of NSCLC patients. (A) Overall survival curves show that patients with high Pyk2[pY881] expression have short survival time by analysing 128 primary NSCLC tissues (P<0.001). (B) Patients with high Pyk2[pY881] expression show poor overall survival by analysing 47 matched metastatic lymph node tissues (P=0.005). (C, D) In the squamous carcinoma subtype, patients with high Pyk2[pY881] expression have poor overall survival (P=0.006). In the adenocarcinoma subtype, patients with high Pyk2[pY881] expression show short overall survival time (P<0.001). The Pyk2[pY881] low expression: score ⩽3; high expression: score ⩾4.
Univariate and multivariate analyses of different prognostic parameters in 128 patients with NSCLCs
| Male | 1.000 | |||||||
| Female | 0.990 (0.650–1.510) | 0.964 | | | | | | |
| ≦60 | 1.000 | |||||||
| >60 | 0.831(0.555–1.243) | 0.367 | | | | | | |
| No | 1.000 | |||||||
| Yes | 0.945 (0.633–1.411) | 0.782 | | | | | | |
| 1.000 | ||||||||
| 0.951 (0.613–1.477) | 0.824 | | | | | | | |
| 1.000 | ||||||||
| 1.267 (0.750–2.139) | 0.377 | | | | | | | |
| 1.000 | ||||||||
| 0.833 (0.420–1.650) | 0.600 | | | | | | | |
| Adenocarcinoma | 1.000 | |||||||
| Squamous carcinoma | 0.747 (0.476–1.173) | 0.205 | | | | | | |
| Well–moderate | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||||
| Poor | 1.511 (1.009–2.261) | 1.455 (0.943–2.245) | 0. 090 | 1.068 (0.680–1.676) | 0.776 | 1.093 (0.705–1.693) | 0.691 | |
| T1 | 1.000 | |||||||
| T2 | 1.067 (0.652–1.747) | 0.795 | ||||||
| T3–T4 | 1.130 (0.819–1.559) | 0.456 | | | | | | |
| N0 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||||
| N1–N3 | 2.212 (1.473–3.320) | 1.516 (0.938–2.448) | 0.089 | 1.494 (0.923–2.419) | 0.102 | 1.480 (0.908–2.412) | 0.116 | |
| M0 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||||
| M1 | 4.855 (2.928–8.051) | 2.099 (1.162–3.793) | 1.832 (1.026–3.272) | 1.892 (1.054–3.399) | ||||
| I–II | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||||
| III–IV | 3.468 (2.283–5.269) | 2.709 (1.630–4.502) | 2.668 (1.591–4.473) | 2.690 (1.617–4.474) | ||||
| Low | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | |||||
| High | 2.423 (1.594–3.685) | 2.089 (1.346–3.241) | | | 1.480 (0.908–2.412) | 0.116 | ||
| Low | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | |||||
| High | 3.505 (2.231–5.505) | 3.086 (1.941–4.907) | 3.223 (2.017–5.150) | |||||
Abbreviations: CEA=carcinoembryonic antigen; CI=confidence interval; EGFR=epidermal growth factor receptor; HR=hazard ratio; NSCLC=non-small-cell lung cancer; NSE=neuron-specific enolase; Pyk2=proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2. Bold values indicates statistical significance.
Pyk2[pY881] excluded.
Pyk2 excluded.
Pyk2 and Pyk2[pY881] included.
CEA: −, normal (0–5 ng ml−1); +, elevated (>5 ng ml−1); 18 patients' CEA unknown.
NSE: −, normal (0–15.2 ng ml−1); +, elevated (>15.2 ng ml−1); 41 patients' NSE unknown.
EGFR: −, no EGFR mutation and amplification; +, EGFR mutation or amplification; 77 patients' EGFR unknown.
Pyk2 low expression: score ⩽3; high expression: score ⩾4.
Pyk2[pY881] low expression: score ⩽3; high expression: score ⩾4.
Figure 7The Pyk2 upregulates CSC marker expression and transforming ability in NSCLC cells. (A) Overexpression of Pyk2 upregulated the expression of the CSC markers ALDH1a1, ABCG2 and Bmi1 at the protein level in A549 and H460 cells. (B) Knockdown of Pyk2 downregulated the expression of the CSC markers ALDH1a1, ABCG2 and Bmi1 at the protein level in A549 and H460 cells. (C) Anchorage-independent growth in soft agar of A549 and H460 cells with or without exogenous Pyk2 expression. (D) Anchorage-independent growth in soft agar of A549 and H460 cells with Pyk2 shRNA or scrambled shRNA. Three independent experiments in triplicate were performed. Magnification: × 40. Error bars represent the s.e.m.