Literature DB >> 23921939

Cost of cholesteatoma care at a tertiary medical center.

Joseph P Roche1, Oliver F Adunka, Harold C Pillsbury, Craig A Buchman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Estimate the available direct cost of cholesteatoma care in a university practice. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review of both physician and hospital financial data during a recent 3-year period.
SETTING: University-based tertiary referral medical system. PATIENTS: Adults (≥ 18 yr old) with cholesteatoma. INTERVENTION(S): Financial information associated with both physician and hospital encounters were analyzed in a deidentified manner. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Frequency and type of encounter, charges, collections, and payers were tabulated.
RESULTS: Approximately 949 physician encounters (817 clinic, 130 surgical, and 2 inpatient) among 344 patients resulted in greater than $700, 000 in charges and greater than $211,000 in receipts (≈ 30% rate of collection). The average physician charge per patient per year was approximately $1,600. About 259 hospital encounters among 171 patients resulted in greater than $1.8 million in charges and greater than $520,000 in receipts (≈ 28% collection rate). The average hospital charge per patient per year was ∼$10,000. For physician encounters, managed care (37%) and Medicare (25%) were the most common payers, whereas 17% were uninsured. For hospital encounters, managed care (28%) and Medicare (14%) were the most common payers, whereas 24% were uninsured.
CONCLUSION: The direct cost of care for patients with cholesteatoma is significant. The current treatment paradigm for this chronic disorder results in repeated health care system access and associated direct (and unmeasured indirect) expenses. Future treatment paradigms should be designed to improve disease-specific quality of life while mitigating this financial impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23921939     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31829410e1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  4 in total

1.  Clinical trials in otology: Examining trends and framework for prioritization.

Authors:  Jake Altshuler; Rohan Viswanathan; Divya B Dasani; Katherine Webb; Tam Ramsey; Varun Patel; Randall Ruffner; Jason Mouzakes; David Foyt
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2020-12-02

2.  Publishing Trends in Otology and Neurotology.

Authors:  Ryan Boerner; Jonathan L Hatch; Elizabeth Harruff; Shaun A Nguyen; Habib G Rizk; Ted A Meyer; Paul R Lambert; Theodore R McRackan
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Cost-comparison analysis of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) versus second look surgery for the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma.

Authors:  David L Choi; Michael K Gupta; Ryan Rebello; Jason D Archibald
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-11-07

4.  Multiwavelength fluorescence otoscope for video-rate chemical imaging of middle ear pathology.

Authors:  Tulio A Valdez; Rishikesh Pandey; Nicolas Spegazzini; Kaitlyn Longo; Corrie Roehm; Ramachandra R Dasari; Ishan Barman
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 6.986

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.