BACKGROUND: Our objective was to determine whether there is variability in the foundational literature and across centers in how mean arterial blood pressure is measured to calculate cerebral perfusion pressure. METHODS: We reviewed foundational literature and sent an e-mail survey to members of the Neurocritical Care Society. RESULTS: Of 32 articles reporting cerebral perfusion pressure data, the reference point for mean arterial blood pressure was identified in 16: 10 heart and 6 midbrain. The overall survey response rate was 14.3%. Responses from 31 of 34 (91%) United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties fellowship-accredited Neurointensive Care Units indicated the reference point was most often the heart (74%), followed by the midbrain (16%). Conflicting answers were received from 10%. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantive heterogeneity in both research reports and clinical practice in how mean arterial blood pressure is measured to determine cerebral perfusion pressure.
BACKGROUND: Our objective was to determine whether there is variability in the foundational literature and across centers in how mean arterial blood pressure is measured to calculate cerebral perfusion pressure. METHODS: We reviewed foundational literature and sent an e-mail survey to members of the Neurocritical Care Society. RESULTS: Of 32 articles reporting cerebral perfusion pressure data, the reference point for mean arterial blood pressure was identified in 16: 10 heart and 6 midbrain. The overall survey response rate was 14.3%. Responses from 31 of 34 (91%) United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties fellowship-accredited Neurointensive Care Units indicated the reference point was most often the heart (74%), followed by the midbrain (16%). Conflicting answers were received from 10%. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantive heterogeneity in both research reports and clinical practice in how mean arterial blood pressure is measured to determine cerebral perfusion pressure.
Authors: Molly M McNett; Mary Kay Bader; Sarah Livesay; Susan Yeager; Cristina Moran; Arianna Barnes; Kimberly R Harrison; DaiWai M Olson Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Peter Le Roux; David K Menon; Giuseppe Citerio; Paul Vespa; Mary Kay Bader; Gretchen M Brophy; Michael N Diringer; Nino Stocchetti; Walter Videtta; Rocco Armonda; Neeraj Badjatia; Julian Böesel; Randall Chesnut; Sherry Chou; Jan Claassen; Marek Czosnyka; Michael De Georgia; Anthony Figaji; Jennifer Fugate; Raimund Helbok; David Horowitz; Peter Hutchinson; Monisha Kumar; Molly McNett; Chad Miller; Andrew Naidech; Mauro Oddo; DaiWai Olson; Kristine O'Phelan; J Javier Provencio; Corinna Puppo; Richard Riker; Claudia Robertson; Michael Schmidt; Fabio Taccone Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2014-08-20 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Peter Le Roux; David K Menon; Giuseppe Citerio; Paul Vespa; Mary Kay Bader; Gretchen M Brophy; Michael N Diringer; Nino Stocchetti; Walter Videtta; Rocco Armonda; Neeraj Badjatia; Julian Böesel; Randall Chesnut; Sherry Chou; Jan Claassen; Marek Czosnyka; Michael De Georgia; Anthony Figaji; Jennifer Fugate; Raimund Helbok; David Horowitz; Peter Hutchinson; Monisha Kumar; Molly McNett; Chad Miller; Andrew Naidech; Mauro Oddo; DaiWai Olson; Kristine O'Phelan; J Javier Provencio; Corinna Puppo; Richard Riker; Claudia Robertson; Michael Schmidt; Fabio Taccone Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: William A Kofke; Yue Ren; John G Augoustides; Hongzhe Li; Katherine Nathanson; Robert Siman; Qing Cheng Meng; Weiming Bu; Sukanya Yandrawatthana; Guy Kositratna; Cecilia Kim; Joseph E Bavaria Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2018-06-26 Impact factor: 4.003