Literature DB >> 23921375

Comparison of immunoglobulin E measurements on IMMULITE and ImmunoCAP in samples consisting of allergen-specific mouse-human chimeric monoclonal antibodies towards allergen extracts and four recombinant allergens.

Pal B Szecsi1, Steen Stender.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody in vitro tests are performed on enzyme immunoassay systems. Poor agreement among systems has been reported and comparisons have been made exclusively with allergen extracts - not with recombinant allergens. Here we compare the ImmunoCAP and the IMMULITE systems.
METHODS: Ten patient samples with positive IgE toward egg white, birch pollen or cat or dog dander were compared using allergen extracts or the recombinant allergens Gal d 1, Bet v 1, Fel d 1 and Can f 1 with the two assay systems. Comparisons were also performed using four monoclonal mouse-human chimeric IgE antibodies specific for the same allergenic components.
RESULTS: IMMULITE estimated a higher allergen-specific IgE concentration in sera than ImmunoCAP when testing with allergen extracts as well as recombinant allergens. The chimeric antibodies gave an equivalent response in the total IgE and specific IgE (sIgE) with an average ratio of 1.08 (range 0.9-1.3) on ImmunoCAP. In contrast, IMMULITE exhibited sIgE signals that were substantially higher than the summed level of IgE for all four chimeric antibodies (average ratio 2.96 and range 1.7-4.3).
CONCLUSION: Comparison using chimeric antibodies allowed the evaluation of the true performance of the systems. ImmunoCAP measured total IgE and sIgE equally, whereas IMMULITE displayed higher sIgE signals when compared to the summed level of total IgE for all four chimeric antibodies. Results obtained with the two assay systems are not interchangeable by means of mathematical conversion.
Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23921375     DOI: 10.1159/000353276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Immunol        ISSN: 1018-2438            Impact factor:   2.749


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of a novel automated allergy microarray platform compared with three other allergy test methods.

Authors:  P Williams; A Önell; F Baldracchini; V Hui; S Jolles; T El-Shanawany
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  Component resolved diagnostics for hymenoptera venom allergy.

Authors:  Thilo Jakob; Ulrich Müller; Arthur Helbling; Edzard Spillner
Journal:  Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2017-10

3.  Diagnostics in Hymenoptera venom allergy: current concepts and developments with special focus on molecular allergy diagnostics.

Authors:  Thilo Jakob; David Rafei-Shamsabadi; Edzard Spillner; Sabine Müller
Journal:  Allergo J Int       Date:  2017-04-11

Review 4.  Antigen 5 Allergens of Hymenoptera Venoms and Their Role in Diagnosis and Therapy of Venom Allergy.

Authors:  Simon Blank; Murilo Luiz Bazon; Johannes Grosch; Carsten B Schmidt-Weber; Márcia Regina Brochetto-Braga; Maria Beatrice Bilò; Thilo Jakob
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 4.806

5.  Precision medicine allergy immunoassay methods for assessing immunoglobulin E sensitization to aeroallergen molecules.

Authors:  Florin-Dan Popescu; Mariana Vieru
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2018-11-29

6.  Comparison of molecular and extract-based allergy diagnostics with multiplex and singleplex analysis.

Authors:  Johannes Huss-Marp; Jan Gutermuth; Ina Schäffner; Ulf Darsow; Florian Pfab; Knut Brockow; Johannes Ring; Heidrun Behrendt; Thilo Jakob; Christoph Ahlgrim
Journal:  Allergo J Int       Date:  2015-03-14

7.  Distinct differences in analytical performance of two commercially available assays for specific IgE to egg white and house dust mite allergens.

Authors:  Komei Ito; Kazunori Tagami
Journal:  Clin Mol Allergy       Date:  2021-08-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.