Literature DB >> 23921339

A prospective randomized study comparing double- and single-bundle techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Mattias Ahldén1, Ninni Sernert, Jón Karlsson, Jüri Kartus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare the results after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using either the double-bundle or single-bundle technique with hamstring tendon autografts in an unselected group of patients. HYPOTHESIS: Double-bundle ACL reconstruction will render a better outcome on the pivot-shift test. STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
METHODS: A randomized series of 103 patients (33 women, 70 men; median age, 27 years; range, 18-52 years) with a unilateral ACL rupture underwent anatomic ACL reconstruction. The double-bundle technique was used in 53 patients, and the single-bundle technique was used in 50 patients. The ACL footprint was visualized, and the femoral tunnel was drilled through the anteromedial portal; interference screw fixation was used at both ends. The patients were examined preoperatively and at a median of 26 months (range, 22-42 months) after the reconstruction by a blinded observer. The primary variable was the pivot-shift test.
RESULTS: At 2-year follow-up, 98 patients (93%) were examined. Clinical assessments at follow-up revealed no significant differences between the double-bundle and single-bundle groups in terms of the pivot-shift test, KT-1000 arthrometer laxity measurements, manual Lachman test, range of motion, Lysholm knee scoring scale, Tegner activity scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score (KOOS), 1-legged hop test, and square hop test. A significant improvement was seen in both groups compared with the preoperative values in terms of most clinical assessments.
CONCLUSION: In this prospective randomized study, the primary variable, the pivot-shift test, and other subjective and objective outcome variables revealed no significant differences between the double-bundle and single-bundle techniques at 2 years after ACL reconstruction in an unselected group of patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior cruciate ligament; double-bundle; randomized controlled trial; reconstruction; single-bundle

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23921339     DOI: 10.1177/0363546513497926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  20 in total

1.  Comparison of outcome after anatomic double-bundle and antero-medial portal non-anatomic single-bundle reconstruction in ACL-injured patients.

Authors:  Ioannis Karikis; Mattias Ahldén; Abraham Casut; Ninni Sernert; Jüri Kartus
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Tibial ACL insertion site length: correlation between preoperative MRI and intra-operative measurements.

Authors:  Harald K Widhalm; Levent Surer; Nikhil Kurapati; Claudia Guglielmino; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The effect of feedback from post-operative 3D CT on placement of femoral tunnels in single-bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Eivind Inderhaug; Allan Larsen; Torbjørn Strand; Per Arne Waaler; Eirik Solheim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Single-bundle modified patellar tendon versus double-bundle tibialis anterior allograft ACL reconstruction: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Hui Jun Kang; Xiao Jing Wang; Chun Juan Wu; Jian Hui Cao; Da Hai Yu; Zhi Min Zheng
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  A systematic review of single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction using the anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction scoring checklist.

Authors:  Neel Desai; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Carola F van Eck; Volker Musahl; Freddie H Fu; Jón Karlsson; Kristian Samuelsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Global rotation has high sensitivity in ACL lesions within stress MRI.

Authors:  João Espregueira-Mendes; Renato Andrade; Ana Leal; Hélder Pereira; Abdala Skaf; Sérgio Rodrigues-Gomes; J Miguel Oliveira; Rui L Reis; Rogério Pereira
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Functional double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts with preserved insertions is an effective treatment for tibiofemoral instability.

Authors:  Qiang Zhang; Yimeng Yang; Ji Li; Hao Zhang; Yangmu Fu; Yan Wang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Single Bundle Versus Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohammed S Alomari; Abdullah A Ghaddaf; Ahmed S Abdulhamid; Mohammed S Alshehri; Mujeeb Ashraf; Hatem H Alharbi
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 1.033

9.  Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a global perspective. Part 1.

Authors:  K K Middleton; T Hamilton; J J Irrgang; J Karlsson; C D Harner; F H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Return to Sport and Re-Injury Rate after Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with at least Five Years of Follow-Up.

Authors:  Alexandre Carneiro Bitar; Antonio Rodolpho Hakime Scalize; Guilherme Abreu; Caio D'Elia; Luiz Henrique Boraschi Vieira Ribas; Wagner Castropil
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2021-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.