Gunther Eysenbach1. 1. Centre for Global eHealth Innovation & Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Randomized trials of web-based and mobile interventions pose very specific issues and challenges. A set of best practices on how to conduct and report such trials was recently summarized in the CONSORT-EHEALTH statement (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials of Electronic and Mobile HEalth Applications and onLine TeleHealth), published in August 2011 as draft and in December 2011 as journal article (V1.6.1). The purpose of this presentation is to review the results of the pilot implementation at the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR), a leading eHealth journal, where reporting of trials in accordance with CONSORT-EHEALTH became mandatory in late 2011. METHODS: Authors of all randomized trials submitted to JMIR were asked to complete an electronic questionnaire, which involved copying pertinent manuscript sections into a CONSORT EHEALTH database form, were asked to score the importance of CONSORT EHEALTH items, and were asked to provide narrative feedback on the value of the process. RESULTS: Between August 2011 and November 2012, 67 randomized trials were submitted, of which 61 were intended for publication in JMIR. Authors reported that it took between 1 and 16 hours to complete the checklist including making required changes to their manuscripts. 72% (48/67) of authors reported they made minor changes to the manuscript, 6% (4/67) made major changes. Most authors felt it was a useful process that improved their manuscripts: 63% (42/67) said it improved their manuscript, 13% (9/67) said it did not, 12% (8/67) indicated that it had improved a little. CONCLUSIONS: The CONSORT EHEALTH statement and checklist appeared successful in improving the quality of reporting. The checklist should be endorsed and used by authors and editors of other journals.
BACKGROUND: Randomized trials of web-based and mobile interventions pose very specific issues and challenges. A set of best practices on how to conduct and report such trials was recently summarized in the CONSORT-EHEALTH statement (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials of Electronic and Mobile HEalth Applications and onLine TeleHealth), published in August 2011 as draft and in December 2011 as journal article (V1.6.1). The purpose of this presentation is to review the results of the pilot implementation at the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR), a leading eHealth journal, where reporting of trials in accordance with CONSORT-EHEALTH became mandatory in late 2011. METHODS: Authors of all randomized trials submitted to JMIR were asked to complete an electronic questionnaire, which involved copying pertinent manuscript sections into a CONSORT EHEALTH database form, were asked to score the importance of CONSORT EHEALTH items, and were asked to provide narrative feedback on the value of the process. RESULTS: Between August 2011 and November 2012, 67 randomized trials were submitted, of which 61 were intended for publication in JMIR. Authors reported that it took between 1 and 16 hours to complete the checklist including making required changes to their manuscripts. 72% (48/67) of authors reported they made minor changes to the manuscript, 6% (4/67) made major changes. Most authors felt it was a useful process that improved their manuscripts: 63% (42/67) said it improved their manuscript, 13% (9/67) said it did not, 12% (8/67) indicated that it had improved a little. CONCLUSIONS: The CONSORT EHEALTH statement and checklist appeared successful in improving the quality of reporting. The checklist should be endorsed and used by authors and editors of other journals.
Authors: Sarah J Iribarren; Hannah Milligan; Cristina Chirico; Kyle Goodwin; Rebecca Schnall; Hugo Telles; Alejandra Iannizzotto; Myrian Sanjurjo; Barry R Lutz; Kenneth Pike; Fernando Rubinstein; Marcus Rhodehamel; Daniel Leon; Jesse Keyes; George Demiris Journal: Lancet Reg Health Am Date: 2022-06-10
Authors: Renaldo M Bernard; Claudia Toppo; Alberto Raggi; Marleen de Mul; Carlota de Miquel; Maria Teresa Pugliese; Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis; Ana Ortiz-Tallo; Luis Salvador-Carulla; Sue Lukersmith; Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen; Dorota Merecz-Kot; Kaja Staszewska; Carla Sabariego Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 7.076
Authors: Michael P Schaub; Larissa J Maier; Andreas Wenger; Lars Stark; Oliver Berg; Thilo Beck; Boris B Quednow; Severin Haug Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2015-07-10 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Michael P Schaub; Andreas Wenger; Oliver Berg; Thilo Beck; Lars Stark; Eveline Buehler; Severin Haug Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2015-10-13 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Jane Catherine Willcox; Karen Jane Campbell; Elizabeth Anne McCarthy; Shelley Ann Wilkinson; Martha Lappas; Kylie Ball; Brianna Fjeldsoe; Anne Griffiths; Robyn Whittaker; Ralph Maddison; Alexis Shub; Deborah Pidd; Elise Fraser; Nelly Moshonas; David Andrew Crawford Journal: Trials Date: 2015-05-07 Impact factor: 2.279