Literature DB >> 23920426

Long-term outcome after anticoagulation-associated intracerebral haemorrhage with or without restarting antithrombotic therapy.

Celine S Gathier1, Ale Algra, Gabriël J E Rinkel, H Bart van der Worp.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For patients who survive intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) during treatment with oral anticoagulation (OAC), the balance between the benefits and risks of restarting OAC is unclear. The decision to restart OAC or to start antiplatelet therapy in these patients therefore poses a dilemma for all physicians involved. We assessed the long-term outcome of patients who did or did not restart antithrombotic therapy after OAC-associated ICH.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective follow-up study of all patients discharged from our institution after OAC-associated ICH over a 10-year period. Data on the use of OAC or platelet inhibitors and the occurrence of vascular events during follow-up were assessed through questionnaires and patient files. The primary outcome was recurrent fatal or non-fatal stroke. Secondary outcomes were the occurrence of other haemorrhagic, thrombotic or thromboembolic events. With patients without antithrombotic treatment as reference, we calculated incidence ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for treatment with OAC and for treatment with antiplatelet therapy.
RESULTS: We included 38 patients, of whom 21 (55%) died during a mean follow-up of 3.5 years. The medication regime changed frequently during follow-up, illustrated by the fact that two thirds of the patients who had resumed OAC within 2 months of ICH terminated this at later points in time. Two recurrent strokes occurred during 35.4 patient-years without antithrombotic medication, 7 during 63.8 patient-years on antiplatelet medication (incidence ratio 1.9; 95% CI, 0.4-9.4), and 3 during 19.5 patient-years on OAC (incidence ratio 2.7; 95% CI, 0.5-16.3). There was only 1 recurrent ICH, which occurred during treatment with OAC.
CONCLUSION: In this observational study, no significant difference in the primary outcome measure was found between the treatment groups, but there was a tendency towards a higher long-term risk of any stroke in patients who resumed OAC or started antiplatelet therapy. However, based on these results it is difficult to draw any concrete conclusions or make any strong recommendations. A randomized trial to assess the optimal long-term strategy after OAC-related ICH is warranted. Based on the point estimates of our study, such a trial should involve at least 300 patient-years of follow-up.
Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23920426     DOI: 10.1159/000351151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis        ISSN: 1015-9770            Impact factor:   2.762


  11 in total

1.  Clinical Benefit of American College of Chest Physicians versus European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for Stroke Prophylaxis in Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Ambar A Andrade; Juan Li; Martha J Radford; David S Nilasena; Brian F Gage
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Restarting oral anticoagulants after intracerebral hemorrhage: cons.

Authors:  Silvia Ricci; Francesca Pistoia; Antonio Carolei; Simona Sacco
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 3.  Restarting Anticoagulant Therapy After Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Santosh B Murthy; Ajay Gupta; Alexander E Merkler; Babak B Navi; Pitchaiah Mandava; Costantino Iadecola; Kevin N Sheth; Daniel F Hanley; Wendy C Ziai; Hooman Kamel
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 4.  Long-term antithrombotic treatment in intracranial hemorrhage survivors with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Eleni Korompoki; Filippos T Filippidis; Peter B Nielsen; Angela Del Giudice; Gregory Y H Lip; Joji B Kuramatsu; Hagen B Huttner; Jiming Fang; Sam Schulman; Joan Martí-Fàbregas; Celine S Gathier; Anand Viswanathan; Alessandro Biffi; Daniela Poli; Christian Weimar; Uwe Malzahn; Peter Heuschmann; Roland Veltkamp
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: optimal management of anticoagulation therapy.

Authors:  Daniel M Witt; Robby Nieuwlaat; Nathan P Clark; Jack Ansell; Anne Holbrook; Jane Skov; Nadine Shehab; Juliet Mock; Tarra Myers; Francesco Dentali; Mark A Crowther; Arnav Agarwal; Meha Bhatt; Rasha Khatib; John J Riva; Yuan Zhang; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-27

6.  [Driving ability with cerebral perfusion disorders].

Authors:  P Marx
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 7.  Resumption of Anticoagulation After Intracranial Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Ivan Rocha Ferreira da Silva; Jennifer A Frontera
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 8.  Anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation after intracranial hemorrhage: A systematic review.

Authors:  Maximiliano A Hawkes; Alejandro A Rabinstein
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2018-02

9.  Apixaban versus Antiplatelet drugs or no antithrombotic drugs after anticoagulation-associated intraCerebral HaEmorrhage in patients with Atrial Fibrillation (APACHE-AF): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Koen M van Nieuwenhuizen; H Bart van der Worp; Ale Algra; L Jaap Kappelle; Gabriel J E Rinkel; Isabelle C van Gelder; Roger E G Schutgens; Catharina J M Klijn
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Resuming anticoagulants after anticoagulation-associated intracranial haemorrhage: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zien Zhou; Jie Yu; Cheryl Carcel; Candice Delcourt; Jiehui Shan; Richard I Lindley; Bruce Neal; Craig S Anderson; Maree L Hackett
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.