| Literature DB >> 23920221 |
Saki Izumi1, Yoshitane Nozaki, Takafumi Komori, Kazuya Maeda, Osamu Takenaka, Kazutomi Kusano, Tsutomu Yoshimura, Hiroyuki Kusuhara, Yuichi Sugiyama.
Abstract
Organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1 plays an important role in the hepatic uptake of many drugs, and the evaluation of OATP1B1-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is emphasized in the latest DDI (draft) guidance documents from U.S. and E.U. regulatory agencies. It has been suggested that some OATP1B1 inhibitors show a discrepancy in their inhibitory potential, depending on the substrates used in the cell-based assay. In this study, inhibitory effects of 14 compounds on the OATP1B1-mediated uptake of the prototypical substrates [³H]estradiol-17β-glucuronide (E₂G), [³H]estrone-3-sulfate (E₁S), and [³H]sulfobromophthalein (BSP) were studied in OATP1B1-transfected cells. Inhibitory potencies of tested compounds varied depending on the substrates. Ritonavir, gemfibrozil, and erythromycin caused remarkable substrate-dependent inhibition with up to 117-, 14-, and 13-fold difference in their IC₅₀ values, respectively. Also, the clinically relevant OATP inhibitors rifampin and cyclosporin A exhibited up to 12- and 6-fold variation in their IC₅₀ values, respectively. Regardless of the inhibitors tested, the most potent OATP1B1 inhibition was observed when [³H]E₂G was used as a substrate. Mutual inhibition studies of OATP1B1 indicated that E₂G and E₁S competitively inhibited each other, whereas BSP noncompetitively inhibited E₂G uptake. In addition, BSP inhibited E₁S in a competitive manner, but E₁S caused an atypical kinetics on BSP uptake. This study showed substrate-dependent inhibition of OATP1B1 and demonstrated that E₂G was the most sensitive in vitro OATP1B1 probe substrate among three substrates tested. This will give us an insight into the assessment of clinically relevant OATP1B1-mediated DDI in vitro with minimum potential of false-negative prediction.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23920221 DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.052290
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Metab Dispos ISSN: 0090-9556 Impact factor: 3.922