Literature DB >> 23919632

Willingness to pay to prevent chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting among patients with breast, lung, or colorectal cancer.

Paul J E Miller1, Sanjeev Balu, Deborah Buchner, Mark S Walker, Edward J Stepanski, Lee S Schwartzberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Understanding the value patients place on avoiding various aspects of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) can help medical professionals assess whether current and emerging treatments are acceptable based on their costs and expected effects. Little is known, however, about the value patients place on avoiding various aspects of CINV. The current study helps fill this gap in the literature.
METHODS: 301 patients completed a discrete-choice conjoint survey. Patients viewed 25 conjoint tasks, each containing two descriptions of CINV, and indicated which they preferred. The descriptions combined levels from eight CINV attributes (likelihood of nausea, duration of nausea, severity of nausea, likelihood of vomiting, duration of vomiting, severity of vomiting, need to seek treatment for dehydration, and out-of-pocket treatment costs).
RESULTS: Cost contributed more to patient choices than any other single attribute. The combined effect of the likelihood, duration, and severity attributes for nausea, however, was a stronger driver of patient choices than cost, as was the combined effect of the likelihood, duration, and severity attributes for vomiting. The nausea attributes also were a stronger driver of patient choices than the vomiting attributes. Patients were willing to pay to avoid increases in all attributes, except likelihood of vomiting, where the result was not statistically different from zero. Willingness-to-pay varied by income, disease stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, chemotherapy status, and whether patients worked while on chemotherapy. LIMITATIONS: Although the study used a convenience sample, data were collected from several geographically dispersed U.S. oncology clinics.
CONCLUSIONS: Several antiemetics are now available at different price points. This study assesses the value patients place on their benefits and may be used to inform decisions about the management of CINV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23919632     DOI: 10.3111/13696998.2013.832257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Econ        ISSN: 1369-6998            Impact factor:   2.448


  8 in total

1.  Quantitative Preferences for Lung Cancer Treatment from the Patients' Perspective: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yasuo Sugitani; Naoko Sugitani; Shunsuke Ono
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Willingness-to-pay for cancer treatment and outcome: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alene Sze Jing Yong; Yi Heng Lim; Mark Wing Loong Cheong; Ednin Hamzah; Siew Li Teoh
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-12-02

3.  Examining racial variation in antiemetic use and post-chemotherapy health care utilization for nausea and vomiting among breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Devon K Check; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; Leah L Zullig; Morris Weinberger; Ethan M Basch; Stacie B Dusetzina
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  DDMC-p53 gene therapy with or without cisplatin and microwave ablation.

Authors:  Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt; Paul Zarogoulidis; Joshua Stopek; Thomas Vogl; Frank Hübner; J Francis Turner; Robert Browning; Konstantinos Zarogoulidis; Antonis Drevelegas; Konstantinos Drevelegas; Kaid Darwiche; Lutz Freitag; Harald Rittger
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Patients' Preferences for Outcome, Process and Cost Attributes in Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.

Authors:  Daniela R Bien; Marion Danner; Vera Vennedey; Daniele Civello; Silvia M Evers; Mickaël Hiligsmann
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Health Related Quality of Life of Cancer Patients in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Tadesse Melaku Abegaz; Asnakew Achaw Ayele; Begashaw Melaku Gebresillassie
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 4.375

7.  Optimizing antiemetic treatment for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in Japan: Update summary of the 2015  Japan Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antiemesis.

Authors:  Kenjiro Aogi; Hideki Takeuchi; Toshiaki Saeki; Keisuke Aiba; Kazuo Tamura; Keiko Iino; Chiyo K Imamura; Kenji Okita; Yoshikazu Kagami; Ryuhei Tanaka; Kazuhiko Nakagawa; Hirofumi Fujii; Narikazu Boku; Makoto Wada; Tatsuo Akechi; Hirotoshi Iihara; Shoichiro Ohtani; Ayako Okuyama; Keiko Ozawa; Yong-Il Kim; Hidenori Sasaki; Yasuo Shima; Masayuki Takeda; Eijiro Nagasaki; Toshihiko Nishidate; Takahiro Higashi; Kouichi Hirata
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-11-08       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  How do women trade-off benefits and risks in chemotherapy treatment decisions based on gene expression profiling for early-stage breast cancer? A discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Deborah A Marshall; Ken Deal; Yvonne Bombard; Natasha Leighl; Karen V MacDonald; Maureen Trudeau
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.