Literature DB >> 23919381

Outcomes of adult dual kidney transplants by KDRI in the United States.

T Klair1, A Gregg, J Phair, L K Kayler.   

Abstract

UNOS guidelines provide inadequate discriminatory criteria for kidneys that should be transplanted as single (SKT) versus dual (DKT). We evaluated the utility of the kidney donor risk index (KDRI) to define kidneys with better outcomes when transplanted as dual. Using SRTR data from 1995 to 2010 of de novo KTX recipients of adult deceased-donor kidneys, we examined outcomes of SKT and DKT stratified by KDRI group ≤1.4 (n = 49 294), 1.41-1.8 (n = 15 674), 1.81-2.2 (n = 6523) and >2.2 (n = 2791). DKT of kidneys with KDRI >2.2 was associated with significantly better overall graft survival [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.96] compared to single kidneys with KDRI >2.2. DKT was associated with significantly decreased odds of delayed graft function (top 2 KDRI categories) and significantly decreased odds of 1-year serum creatinine level >2 mg/dL (top 3 KDRI categories). Among SKT and DKT from KDRI >2.2 there were 16.1 and 13.9 graft losses per 100 patient follow-up years, respectively. KDRI >2.2 is a useful discriminatory cut-off for the determination of graft survival benefit with the use of DKT; however, the benefit of increased graft years was less than half of single kidneys from donors in the same KDRI range. © Copyright 2013 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dual; KDRI; kidney transplantation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23919381     DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  7 in total

1.  Kidneys at higher risk of discard: expanding the role of dual kidney transplantation.

Authors:  B Tanriover; S Mohan; D J Cohen; J Radhakrishnan; T L Nickolas; P W Stone; D S Tsapepas; R J Crew; G K Dube; P R Sandoval; B Samstein; E Dogan; R S Gaston; J N Tanriover; L E Ratner; M A Hardy
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  R Open Source Programming Code for Calculation of the Kidney Donor Profile Index and Kidney Donor Risk Index.

Authors:  Boris Bikbov
Journal:  Kidney Dis (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-05

Review 3.  Dual Kidney Transplantation: A Review of Past and Prospect for Future.

Authors:  Muhammad Abdul Mabood Khalil; Jackson Tan; Taqi F Toufeeq Khan; Muhammad Ashhad Ullah Khalil; Rabeea Azmat
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2017-07-02

Review 4.  Scoring systems of kidney donation from deceased donors: A systematic review.

Authors:  Fateme Moghbeli; Majid Jangi; Zahra Ebnehoseini
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2021-12-31

5.  Utilization and Outcomes of Single and Dual Kidney Transplants from Older Deceased Donors in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Maria Ibrahim; George H B Greenhall; Dominic M Summers; Lisa Mumford; Rachel Johnson; Richard J Baker; John Forsythe; Gavin J Pettigrew; Niaz Ahmad; Chris J Callaghan
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Renal Transplants from Older Deceased Donors: Use of Preimplantation Biopsy and Differential Allocation to Dual or Single Kidney Transplant according to Histological Score Has No Advantages over Allocation to Single Kidney Transplant by Simple Clinical Indication.

Authors:  Costanza Casati; Valeriana Giuseppina Colombo; Marialuisa Perrino; Ornella Marina Rossetti; Marialuisa Querques; Alessandro Giacomoni; Agnese Binaggia; Giacomo Colussi
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2018-05-16

7.  Identification and weighting of kidney allocation criteria: a novel multi-expert fuzzy method.

Authors:  Nasrin Taherkhani; Mohammad Mehdi Sepehri; Shadi Shafaghi; Toktam Khatibi
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.796

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.