Literature DB >> 23919351

Toxicity and mutagenicity of Gulf of Mexico waters during and after the deepwater horizon oil spill.

John H Paul1, David Hollander, Paula Coble, Kendra L Daly, Sue Murasko, David English, Jonelle Basso, Jennifer Delaney, Lauren McDaniel, Charles W Kovach.   

Abstract

The Deepwater Horizon oil spill is unparalleled among environmental hydrocarbon releases, because of the tremendous volume of oil, the additional contamination by dispersant, and the oceanic depth at which this release occurred. Here, we present data on general toxicity and mutagenicity of upper water column waters and, to a lesser degree, sediment porewater of the Northeastern Gulf of Mexico (NEGOM) and west Florida shelf (WFS) at the time of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010 and thereafter. During a research cruise in August 2010, analysis of water collected in the NEGOM indicated that samples of 3 of 14 (21%) stations were toxic to bacteria based on the Microtox assay, 4 of 13 (34%) were toxic to phytoplankton via the QwikLite assay, and 6 of 14 (43%) showed DNA damaging activity using the λ-Microscreen Prophage induction assay. The Microtox and Microscreen assays indicated that the degree of toxicity was correlated to total petroleum hydrocarbon concentration. Long-term monitoring of stations on the NEGOM and the WFS was undertaken by 8 and 6 cruises to these areas, respectively. Microtox toxicity was nearly totally absent by December 2010 in the Northeastern Gulf of Mexico (3 of 8 cruises with one positive station). In contrast, QwikLite toxicity assay yielded positives at each cruise, often at multiple stations or depths, indicating the greater sensitivity of the QwikLite assay to environmental factors. The Microscreen mutagenicity assays indicated that certain water column samples overlying the WFS were mutagenic at least 1.5 years after capping the Macondo well. Similarly, sediment porewater samples taken from 1000, 1200, and 1400 m from the slope off the WFS in June 2011 were also highly genotoxic. Our observations are consistent with a portion of the dispersed oil from the Macondo well area advecting to the southeast and upwelling onto the WFS, although other explanations exist. Organisms in contact with these waters might experience DNA damage that could lead to mutation and heritable alterations to the community pangenome. Such mutagenic interactions might not become apparent in higher organisms for years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23919351     DOI: 10.1021/es401761h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  12 in total

Review 1.  Using dispersants after oil spills: impacts on the composition and activity of microbial communities.

Authors:  Sara Kleindienst; John H Paul; Samantha B Joye
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Oil spill recovery: Graphene heaters absorb faster.

Authors:  Despina Fragouli; Athanassia Athanassiou
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 39.213

3.  Sugar based amphiphiles: easily accessible and efficient crude oil spill thickening agents.

Authors:  Malick Samateh; Adiyala Vidyasagar; Swapnil R Jadhav; George John
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.361

4.  Distribution of petrogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in seafood following Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

Authors:  Harshica Fernando; Hyunsu Ju; Ramu Kakumanu; Kamlesh K Bhopale; Sharon Croisant; Cornelis Elferink; Bhupendra S Kaphalia; G A Shakeel Ansari
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.553

5.  Rapid alterations to marine microbiota communities following an oil spill.

Authors:  Brad J Gemmell; Hernando P Bacosa; Ben O Dickey; Colbi G Gemmell; Lama R Alqasemi; Edward J Buskey
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Responses of sympatric Karenia brevis, Prorocentrum minimum, and Heterosigma akashiwo to the exposure of crude oil.

Authors:  Koray Ozhan; Sibel Bargu
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 7.  Challenging Oil Bioremediation at Deep-Sea Hydrostatic Pressure.

Authors:  Alberto Scoma; Michail M Yakimov; Nico Boon
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Hydrocarbonoclastic Alcanivorax Isolates Exhibit Different Physiological and Expression Responses to n-dodecane.

Authors:  Marta Barbato; Alberto Scoma; Francesca Mapelli; Rebecca De Smet; Ibrahim M Banat; Daniele Daffonchio; Nico Boon; Sara Borin
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Changes in Reef Fish Community Structure Following the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill.

Authors:  Justin P Lewis; Joseph H Tarnecki; Steven B Garner; David D Chagaris; William F Patterson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A conceptual framework for the emerging discipline of conservation physiology.

Authors:  Laura E Coristine; Cassandra M Robillard; Jeremy T Kerr; Constance M O'Connor; Dominique Lapointe; Steven J Cooke
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 3.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.