| Literature DB >> 23919145 |
Douglas W Drury1, Ross C Ehmke, Victoria N Jideonwo, Michael J Wade.
Abstract
When hybrid inviability is an indirect by-product of local adaptation, we expect its degree of severity between pairs of populations to vary and to be sensitive to the environment. While complete reciprocal hybrid inviability is the outcome of the gradual process of local adaptation, it is not representative of the process of accumulation of incompatibility. In the flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum, some pairs of populations exhibit complete, reciprocal F1 hybrid incompatibility while other pairs are fully or partially compatible. We characterize this naturally occurring variation in the degree and timing of expression of the hybrid incompatible phenotype to better understand the number of genes or developmental processes contributing to speciation. We assessed the morphological and developmental variation in four Tribolium castaneum populations and their 12 possible F1 hybrids at each life-history stage from egg to adult. We find that the rate of hybrid larval development is affected in all interpopulation crosses, including those eventually producing viable, fertile adults. Hybrid incompatibility manifests early in development as changes in the duration of instars and diminished success in the transition between instars are relative to the parent populations. Parent populations with similar developmental profiles may produce hybrids with disrupted development. The degree and timing of expression of hybrid inviability depends upon populations crossed, direction of the cross, and environment in which hybrids are raised. Our findings suggest that the coordinated expression of genes involved in transitional periods of development is the underlying cause of hybrid incompatibility in this species.Entities:
Keywords: Development; Tribolium; hybridization; speciation
Year: 2013 PMID: 23919145 PMCID: PMC3728940 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.536
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Estimates of larval asymptotic size (α) for each of the 64 treatments
| Dam type | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low temperature | High temperature | |||||||
| Sire type | Canada | Colombia | Georgia | India | Canada | Colombia | Georgia | India |
| Uncontrolled density | ||||||||
| Canada | 6.03 (5.59–6.47) | 6.67 (6.15–7.19) | 6.08 (5.97–6.20) | 6.12 (5.78–6.12) | 5.69 (4.64–6.75) | 4.74 (4.40–5.08) | 6.70 (6.37–7.03) | 6.12 (5.65–6.59) |
| Colombia | 6.76 (5.91–7.60) | 7.33 (6.51–8.16) | 6.81 (6.64–6.98) | inviable | 5.82 (4.89–6.66) | 7.87 (7.32–8.42) | 5.82 (5.41–6.22) | inviable |
| Georgia | 6.30 (5.82–6.78) | 7.01 (6.81–7.22) | 6.93 (6.65–7.20) | 6.74 (6.61–6.87) | 6.89 (5.86–8.09) | 6.20 (5.40–7.00) | 6.09 (5.97–6.20) | 6.35 (6.16–6.54) |
| India | 6.00 (4.48–7.51) | inviable | 6.13 (5.80–6.46) | 7.74 (7.26–8.22) | 6.37 (4.37–8.36) | 2.72 (2.59–2.84) | 6.41 (6.01–6.82) | 5.95 (5.82–6.08) |
| Controlled density | ||||||||
| Canada | 5.51 (4.88–6.13) | 6.55 (6.06–7.03) | 5.32 (5.19–5.45) | 5.62 (5.08–6.16) | 5.37 (5.10–5.65) | 5.23 (4.93–5.53) | ||
| Colombia | 6.39 (6.16–6.62) | 7.08 (6.49–7.68) | inviable | 5.98 (5.60–6.36) | 5.59 (5.30–5.89) | inviable | ||
| Georgia | 4.85 (2.52–7.18) | 6.34 (6.00–6.67) | 5.92 (5.25–6.58) | 7.24 (6.49–8.00) | 7.16 (1.19–13.12) | 6.36 (5.70–7.02) | 5.43 (3.98–6.88) | 5.12 (4.73–5.52) |
| India | 5.55 (4.85–6.25) | inviable | 8.51 (6.16–10.86) | 6.55 (6.23–6.87) | 5.59 (4.58–6.59) | 3.03 (2.81–3.25) | 6.46 (5.97–6.95) | 5.77 (5.35–6.19) |
All estimates correspond to millimeters (mm).
designates insufficient biological samples for the model to achieve convergence, low temperature: 26°C, high temperature: 34°C.
Estimates of larval growth rate (k) for each of the 64 treatments
| Dam type | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low temperature | High temperature | |||||||
| Sire type | Canada | Colombia | Georgia | India | Canada | Colombia | Georgia | India |
| Uncontrolled density | ||||||||
| Canada | 0.064 (0.053–0.074) | 0.070 (0.060–0.081) | 0.090 (0.085–0.095) | 0.065 (0.061–0.069) | 0.137 (0.103–0.171) | 0.221 (0.186–0.256) | 0.134 (0.124–0.144) | 0.141 (0.125–0.156) |
| Colombia | 0.075 (0.057–0.092) | 0.049 (0.042–0.057) | 0.074 (0.070–0.078) | inviable | 0.273 (0.177–0.369) | 0.103 (0.092–0.114) | 0.184 (0.161–0.207) | inviable |
| Georgia | 0.086 (0.072–0.099) | 0.075 (0.071–0.080) | 0.054 (0.05–0.058) | 0.082 (0.077–0.087) | 0.151 (0.116–0.186) | 0.154 (0.128–0.181) | 0.147 (0.138–0.156) | 0.151 (0.142–0.161) |
| India | 0.043 (0.026–0.060) | inviable | 0.082 (0.072–0.092) | 0.056 (0.051–0.060) | 0.119 (0.079–0.159) | 0.192 (0.153–0.231) | 0.133 (0.118–0.148) | 0.172 (0.162–0.183) |
| Controlled density | ||||||||
| Canada | 0.094 (0.073–0.114) | 0.089 (0.075–0.104) | 0.107 (0.098–0.117) | 0.155 (0.129–0.182) | 0.313 (0.233–0.393) | 0.294 (0.241–0.347) | ||
| Colombia | 0.081 (0.074–0.089) | 0.087 (0.074–0.100) | inviable | 0.223 (0.175–0.271) | 0.324 (0.254–0.394) | inviable | ||
| Georgia | 0.126 (0.033–0.219) | 0.101 (0.089–0.114) | 0.084 (0.068–0.099) | 0.087 (0.073–0.101) | 0.157 (0.020–0.294) | 0.264 (0.191–0.337) | 0.211 (0.111–0.311) | 0.379 (0.271–0.487) |
| India | 0.057 (0.042–0.072) | inviable | 0.046 (0.034–0.059) | 0.080 (0.072–0.089) | 0.272 (0.132–0.412) | 0.137 (−0.035–0.309) | 0.188 (0.165–0.210) | 0.216 (0.165–0.268) |
All estimates correspond to millimeters per day (mm*day−1)
designates insufficient sample size for the model to achieve convergence; low temperature: 26°C, high temperature: 34°C.
Figure 1The portion of larvae which reach free-living adults. Bars display the mean (± SEM) survival, paired by temperature with dam nested within sires. All offspring of the Indian sires-by-Colombian dam and Colombian sire-by-Indian dam, and both temperatures do not reach adulthood.
G-test for heterogeneity of survival rates from 4-day larvae to adult
| Df | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Parental 26°C | 3.093 | 7 | 0.8707 |
| Parental 34°C | 9.684 | 7 | 0.2225 |
| Pooled parental | 13.876 | 15 | 0.5552 |
| Hybrids 26°C | 116.357 | 18 | <0.0001 |
| Hybrids 34°C | 6.99 | 19 | 0.9943 |
| Hybrids pooled | 138.19 | 38 | <0.0001 |
| Total pooled | 153.17 | 54 | <0.0001 |
Figure 2The frequency of terminal abnormalities among crosses. All offspring of the Indian sires-by-Colombian dam and Colombian sire-by-Indian dam do not reach adulthood and are thus excluded. Figure 3 provides a phenotypic description and illustration of the three morphologies.
Figure 3(a) Lateral view of normal adult beetle morphology. (b) Representative hybrid beetle of an Indian sire-by-Canada dam cross-reared at 26°C. These beetles die due a failure to complete eclosion. (c) Representative hybrid beetle with split elytra (Indian sire-by-Canada dam cross-reared at 34°C) [Photo by: Franck Simonnet.]