| Literature DB >> 23919086 |
Chi-Te Huang1, Ming-Jun Tsai, Yu-Hsuan Lin, Yaw-Sya Fu, Yaw-Bin Huang, Yi-Hung Tsai, Pao-Chu Wu.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of microemulsions as a drug vehicle for transdermal delivery of citalopram. A computerized statistical technique of response surface methodology with mixture design was used to investigate and optimize the influence of the formulation compositions including a mixture of Brij 30/Brij 35 surfactants (at a ratio of 4:1, 20%-30%), isopropyl alcohol (20%-30%), and distilled water (40%-50%) on the properties of the drug-loaded microemulsions, including permeation rate (flux) and lag time. When microemulsions were used as a vehicle, the drug permeation rate increased significantly and the lag time shortened significantly when compared with the aqueous control of 40% isopropyl alcohol solution containing 3% citalopram, demonstrating that microemulsions are a promising vehicle for transdermal application. With regard to the pharmacokinetic parameters of citalopram, the flux required for the transdermal delivery system was about 1280 μg per hour. The microemulsions loaded with citalopram 3% and 10% showed respective flux rates of 179.6 μg/cm(2) and 513.8 μg/cm(2) per hour, indicating that the study formulation could provide effective therapeutic concentrations over a practical application area. The animal study showed that the optimized formulation (F15) containing 3% citalopram with an application area of 3.46 cm(2) is able to reach a minimum effective therapeutic concentration with no erythematous reaction.Entities:
Keywords: citalopram; microemulsion; transdermal delivery systems
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23919086 PMCID: PMC3699131 DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S43474
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Nanomedicine ISSN: 1176-9114
Composition, physiochemical properties, and permeability parameters of citalopram-loaded model microemulsions
| X1 | X2 | X3 | Size (nm) | PI | Viscosity (cps × 103) | Flux(μg/cm2/h) | LT (h) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F01 | 23.3 | 23.3 | 43.3 | 13.9 ± 0.7 | 0.39 ± 0.18 | 10.23 ± 0.06 | 163.8 ± 4.5 | 1.3 ± 0.6 |
| F02 | 21.7 | 26.7 | 41.7 | 16.0 ± 2.0 | 0.38 ± 0.13 | 8.9 ± 0.07 | 161.5 ± 6.8 | 1.0 ± 0.0 |
| F03 | 20.0 | 30.0 | 40.0 | 16.5 ± 0.1 | 0.47 ± 0.04 | 7.53 ± 0.06 | 165.0 ± 20.7 | 0.8 ± 0.3 |
| F04 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 40.0 | 38.0 ± 10.5 | 0.43 ± 0.10 | 9.80 ± 0.10 | 172.1 ± 14.1 | 2.0 ± 0.0 |
| F05 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 19.9 ± 3.7 | 0.30 ± 0.15 | 10.73 ± 0.12 | 153.8 ± 16.1 | 1.2 ± 0.8 |
| F06 | 20.0 | 30.0 | 40.0 | 17.3 ± 2.4 | 0.43 ± 0.12 | 7.08 ± 0.07 | 179.8 ± 11.8 | 1.5 ± 0.9 |
| F07 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 17.7 ± 3.2 | 0.33 ± 0.18 | 10.17 ± 0.06 | 179.8 ± 18.1 | 1.7 ± 0.6 |
| F08 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 40.0 | 20.8 ± 6.4 | 0.36 ± 0.09 | 9.22 ± 0.04 | 176.8 ± 15.9 | 1.7 ± 0.6 |
| F09 | 30.0 | 20.0 | 40.0 | 18.5 ± 10.7 | 0.44 ± 0.10 | 13.07 ± 0.06 | 191.8 ± 14.6 | 2.7 ± 0.6 |
| F10 | 21.7 | 21.7 | 46.7 | 14.5 ± 0.5 | 0.33 ± 0.01 | 10.23 ± 0.06 | 188.6 ± 13.4 | 2.3 ± 0.6 |
| F11 | 30.0 | 20.0 | 40.0 | 32.1 ± 5.5 | 0.34 ± 0.05 | 12.70 ± 0.00 | 216.1 ± 11.0 | 2.7 ± 0.6 |
| F12 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 45.0 | 13.5 ± 0.2 | 0.45 ± 0.09 | 12.00 ± 0.10 | 211.0 ± 8.1 | 3.0 ± 0.0 |
| F13 | 26.7 | 21.7 | 41.7 | 13.2 ± 0.1 | 0.45 ± 0.09 | 11.30 ± 0.10 | 221.5 ± 8.9 | 2.7 ± 0.6 |
| F14 | 20.0 | 25.0 | 45.0 | 13.2 ± 0.1 | 0.36 ± 0.14 | 9.52 ± 0.10 | 245.6 ± 14.0 | 2.7 ± 0.6 |
Notes: Amount of citalopram and isopropyl myristate was fixed at 300 mg and 1.0 g, respectively; total amount of three variables of X1 (Brij 30/Brij 35 = 4/1, 20%–30%), X2 (isopropyl alcohol 20%–30%), and X3 (distilled water, 40%–50%) was 9.0 g X1 + X2 + X3 = 1.
Abbreviations: LT, lag time; PI, polydispersity index.
Figure 1Pseudoternary phase of microemulsion composed of isopropyl myristate, mixed Brij 30/Brij 35 surfactant and aqueous solution containing 40% different cosurfactants. Isopropyl alcohol (A), poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) 400 (B), and propylene glycol (C).
Abbreviation: IPM, isopropyl myristate.
Figure 2In vitro penetration-time profile of model citalopram formulations and aqueous control of 40% isopropyl alcohol containing 3% citalopram through rat skin (n = 3).
Figure 3Three-dimensional response surface plots illustrating the effect of surfactant (X1), isopropyl alcohol (X2), and distilled water (X3) on the flux and lag time of citalopram from microemulsions.
Figure 4Various concentrations of citalopram in microemulsion (F15) on flux level per unit area (μg/cm2 per hour) from time zero to 12 hours (n = 3).
Figure 5Plasma concentration-time curve for citalopram in rats after transdermal administration of 3% citalopram microemulsion (F15).
Note: Each sample point represents the mean of three experiments (mean ± standard error of the mean).
Abbreviations: IPA, isopropyl alcohol; ME, microemulsion.
Color difference in rat skin treated with microemulsions containing different amounts of citalopram at different time points as measured by colorimetry
| Control | 2 hours
| 6 hours
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citalopram 0% | Citalopram 3% | Citalopram 0% | Citalopram 3% | ||
| L* | 66.96 ± 2.32 | 62.95 ± 2.06 | 68.72 ± 0.95 | 62.40 ± 0.80 | 67.62 ± 0.94 |
| a* | 4.65 ± 0.88 | 7.87 ± 2.74 | 5.44 ± 0.85 | 8.56 ± 1.93 | 6.65 ± 1.92 |
| b* | 1.62 ± 1.53 | 2.31 ± 0.36 | −1.74 ± 1.03 | 1.35 ± 0.64 | −2.27 ± 0.56 |
Notes: Control, untreated rat skin site. L*, white-black index; a*, red-green index; b*, yellow-blue index. All four groups of formulations showed no significant difference in L* (white-black index) or a* (red-green index) compared with untreated skin near attachment site. All data represent the mean of three experiments.