Literature DB >> 23918838

Programming exercise intensity in patients on beta-blocker treatment: the importance of choosing an appropriate method.

Isabel Díaz-Buschmann1, Koldo Villelabeitia Jaureguizar2, Maria José Calero3, Rosa Sánchez Aquino3.   

Abstract

AIM: To verify the usefulness of current recommended level of target exercise heart rate (HR) and of different HR-based methods for calculating target HR in patients with and without beta-blocker treatment.
METHODS: We studied 53 patients not treated with beta-blocker and 159 patients on beta-blocker treatment. All patients underwent a maximal exercise test with gas analysis, and first ventilatory threshold (VT1 or aerobic threshold), second ventilatory threshold (VT2 or anaerobic threshold), time of exercise, maximum load, metabolic parameters, HR at rest (HRrest), HRpeak, HR at VT1 (HRVT1) and at VT2 (HRVT2), and 75, 80, and 85% of HRmax (HR75%, HR80%, HR85%) were calculated. Exercise HR was also determined using the Karvonen formula, applying 60, 70, and 80% of the heart rate reserve (HRR) (HRKarv0.6, HRKarv0.7, and HRKarv0.8).
RESULTS: This study included 102 patients on a beta-blocker and 39 not treated with negative cronotropic effect drugs. Maximum load, metabolic parameters, HRrest, HRpeak, HRVT1, and HRVT2 were significantly lower in patients on beta-blocker treatment. The proportion of patients with a HR75%, HR80%, HR85%, ​​HRKarv0.6, HRKarv0.7, and HRKarv0.8 <VT1 and >VT2 was very high and depended on whether patients were on beta-blocker treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Prescribed exercise intensity should be within VT1 and VT2, so that the efficacy and safety is guaranteed. If determining VT1 and VT2 is not possible, HR-based methods can be used, but with caution. In fact, there will be always a proportion of patients training below VT1 or above VT2. On the other hand, recommendations for patients on a beta-blocker should be different from patients not receiving a beta-blocker. Patients not treated with a beta-blocker should exercise at HRKarv0.7 or at HR85%. In patients on a beta-blocker, we recommend preferentially a target HR of HRKarv0.6 or HR80%. © The European Society of Cardiology 2013 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beta-blocker; Karvonen’s method; cardiac rehabilitation; exercise intensity; target heart rate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23918838     DOI: 10.1177/2047487313500214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol        ISSN: 2047-4873            Impact factor:   7.804


  11 in total

1.  Long-term effects of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation in Austria: a nationwide registry.

Authors:  Josef Niebauer; Karl Mayr; Hanns Harpf; Peter Hofmann; Edith Müller; Manfred Wonisch; Rochus Pokan; Werner Benzer
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 2.  High-Intensity Interval Training in Cardiac Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Yaoshan Dun; Joshua R Smith; Suixin Liu; Thomas P Olson
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 3.076

3.  Effect of Interval Training on the Factors Influencing Maximal Oxygen Consumption: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Michael A Rosenblat; Cesare Granata; Scott G Thomas
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 11.928

4.  Cardiac Medications Can Influence the Exercise Prescription in Chagas Heart Disease.

Authors:  Raphael Martins Cunha; Rodrigo Pires Santos; Alexandre Machado Lehnen
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Protocol for the PREHAB study-Pre-operative Rehabilitation for reduction of Hospitalization After coronary Bypass and valvular surgery: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Andrew N Stammers; D Scott Kehler; Jonathan Afilalo; Lorraine J Avery; Sean M Bagshaw; Hilary P Grocott; Jean-Francois Légaré; Sarvesh Logsetty; Colleen Metge; Thang Nguyen; Kenneth Rockwood; Jitender Sareen; Jo-Ann Sawatzky; Navdeep Tangri; Nicholas Giacomantonio; Ansar Hassan; Todd A Duhamel; Rakesh C Arora
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Influences of 12-Week Physical Activity Interventions on TMS Measures of Cortical Network Inhibition and Upper Extremity Motor Performance in Older Adults-A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Keith M McGregor; Bruce Crosson; Kevin Mammino; Javier Omar; Paul S García; Joe R Nocera
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 5.750

7.  Effects of αβ-Blocker Versus β1-Blocker Treatment on Heart Rate Response During Incremental Cardiopulmonary Exercise in Japanese Male Patients with Subacute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Shinji Nemoto; Yusuke Kasahara; Kazuhiro P Izawa; Satoshi Watanabe; Kazuya Yoshizawa; Naoya Takeichi; Kentaro Kamiya; Norio Suzuki; Kazuto Omiya; Atsuhiko Matsunaga; Yoshihiro J Akashi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Cardiorespiratory Responses During High-Intensity Interval Training Prescribed by Rating of Perceived Exertion in Patients After Myocardial Infarction Enrolled in Early Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Yaoshan Dun; Shane M Hammer; Joshua R Smith; Mary C MacGillivray; Benjamin S Simmons; Ray W Squires; Suixin Liu; Thomas P Olson
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-05

9.  Targeting Physical Health in Schizophrenia: Results from the Physical Activity Can Enhance Life (PACE-Life) 24-Week Open Trial.

Authors:  Julia Browne; Claudio Battaglini; L Fredrik Jarskog; Paschal Sheeran; Ana M Abrantes; Jessica McDermott; Tonya Elliott; Oscar Gonzalez; David L Penn
Journal:  Ment Health Phys Act       Date:  2021-04-20

10.  Effects of the Intensity of Lifestyle Exercise on Changes in Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Carolyn Harmon Still; Shirley M Moore; Abdus Sattar
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 1.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.