Literature DB >> 23918491

Provider performance measures in private and public programs: achieving meaningful alignment with flexibility to innovate.

Aparna Higgins1, German Veselovskiy, Lauren McKown.   

Abstract

In recent years there has been a significant expansion in the use of provider performance measures for quality improvement, payment, and public reporting. Using data from a survey of health plans, we characterize the use of such performance measures by private payers. We also compare the use of these measures among selected private and public programs. We studied twenty-three health plans with 121 million commercial enrollees--66 percent of the national commercial enrollment. The health plans reported using 546 distinct performance measures. There was much variation in the use of performance measures in both private and public payment and care delivery programs, despite common areas of focus that included cardiovascular conditions, diabetes, and preventive services. We conclude that policy makers and stakeholders who seek less variability in the use of performance measures to increase consistency should balance this goal with the need for flexibility to meet the needs of specific populations and promote innovation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Reform; Managed Care; Quality Of Care

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23918491     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  5 in total

1.  Public reporting and the evolution of diabetes quality.

Authors:  Jeffrey S McCullough; Daniel J Crespin; Jean M Abraham; Jon B Christianson; Michael Finch
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2015-03-06

Review 2.  Quality indicators and performance measures in diabetes care.

Authors:  David C Aron
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.810

3.  Hospital-level compliance with the commission on cancer's quality of care measures and the association with patient survival.

Authors:  Daniel P Nussbaum; Christel N Rushing; Zhifei Sun; Babatunde A Yerokun; Mathias Worni; Robert S Saunders; Mark B McClellan; Donna Niedzwiecki; Rachel A Greenup; Dan G Blazer
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 4.  Primary Care Performance Measurement and Reporting at a Regional Level: Could a Matrix Approach Provide Actionable Information for Policy Makers and Clinicians?

Authors:  Julia M Langton; Sabrina T Wong; Sharon Johnston; Julia Abelson; Mehdi Ammi; Fred Burge; John Campbell; Jeannie Haggerty; William Hogg; Walter P Wodchis; Kimberlyn McGrail
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2016-11

5.  The complex case of EHRs: examining the factors impacting the EHR user experience.

Authors:  Michael A Tutty; Lindsey E Carlasare; Stacy Lloyd; Christine A Sinsky
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.