Literature DB >> 23917893

[Validity of admission diagnoses as process-driving criteria : influence on length of stay and consultation rate in emergency departments].

M Bernhard1, C Raatz, P Zahn, A Merker, A Gries.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians and specialists often refer patients to the emergency department with a specific diagnosis and request for admission. Such an external diagnosis frequently influences the initial evaluation in the emergency department. The present study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of such external diagnoses and to assess the consequences of incorrect diagnoses on length of stay and number of specialty consultations in the emergency department.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective observational study over the course of 3 months in the emergency department of a tertiary care center. External admission diagnoses made by primary care physicians and specialists were categorized as "accurate", "partially accurate" and "inaccurate". A special analysis of the external admission diagnosed was performed for patients admitted directly to an intermediary care unit and intensive care unit or patients who were transferred directly from the emergency department to the operating room.
RESULTS: Data for 784 patients were analyzed. Patients were on average 63.1 ± 19.5 years old (minimum-maximum 18-97 years, median 68 years) and 54 % were male. After emergency department evaluation and treatment 57.8 % of external diagnoses were categorized as accurate, 23.6 % as partially accurate and 18.6 % as inaccurate. Patients with partially accurate and inaccurate diagnoses had a 3 and 6.5 times higher rate of specialty consultations in the emergency department, respectively, when compared with patients with an accurate diagnosis (number of specialty consultations n = 0: 77.3 % vs. 54.1 % vs. 92.9 %, p < 0.05; n = 1: 20.0 % vs. 40.4 % vs. 6.2 %, p < 0.05; n = 2: 2.7 % vs. 5.5 % vs. 0.9 %, p < 0.05, respectively. Patients with an accurate diagnosis had a shorter total length of stay than patients with a partially accurate or inaccurate diagnosis [mean ± SD (min-max; median): 192 ± 108 min (10-707 min; 181 min) vs. 246 ± 126 min (27-1,026 min; 214 min) vs. 258 ± 138 min (22-700 min; 232 min), p < 0.001], respectively. Out of 85 patients admitted directly to an intermediary care unit, intensive care unit and patients who were transferred directly from the emergency department to the operating room the diagnosis was accurate, partially accurate and inaccurate in 56.5 %, 24.7 % and 18.8 %, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Admission diagnoses made by primary care physicians and specialists who subsequently refer patients to the emergency department are subject to certain inaccuracies. Inaccurate admission diagnoses are associated with an increased length of stay and a considerably higher rate of specialty consultation in the emergency department. Standardized operating procedures, treatment algorithms and triage systems are important to identify such incorrect diagnoses so that these patients can undergo appropriate diagnostic investigation and treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23917893     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-013-2207-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  7 in total

1.  Numerical parameters and quality indicators in a medical emergency department.

Authors:  Harald Dormann; Katharina Diesch; Thomas Ganslandt; Eckhardt G Hahn
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 2.  International perspectives on emergency department crowding.

Authors:  Jesse M Pines; Joshua A Hilton; Ellen J Weber; Annechien J Alkemade; Hasan Al Shabanah; Philip D Anderson; Michael Bernhard; Alessio Bertini; André Gries; Santiago Ferrandiz; Vijaya Arun Kumar; Veli-Pekka Harjola; Barbara Hogan; Bo Madsen; Suzanne Mason; Gunnar Ohlén; Timothy Rainer; Niels Rathlev; Eric Revue; Drew Richardson; Mehdi Sattarian; Michael J Schull
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  [Personnel planning in the emergency department. Optimized patient care round the clock].

Authors:  A Gries; A Michel; M Bernhard; J Martin
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  [The department of interdisciplinary emergency medicine: organization, structure and process optimization].

Authors:  Michael Bernhard; Christian Pietsch; André Gries
Journal:  Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 0.698

5.  Unanticipated death after discharge home from the emergency department.

Authors:  David P Sklar; Cameron S Crandall; Eric Loeliger; Kathleen Edmunds; Ian Paul; Deborah L Helitzer
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  [Manchester triage system. Process optimization in the interdisciplinary emergency department].

Authors:  O Schellein; F Ludwig-Pistor; D H Bremerich
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Association between waiting times and short term mortality and hospital admission after departure from emergency department: population based cohort study from Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Astrid Guttmann; Michael J Schull; Marian J Vermeulen; Therese A Stukel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-06-01
  7 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  [Training in clinical acute and emergency medicine - Supraspeciality in Germany : A concept for nationwide implementation!]

Authors:  A Gries; A Seekamp; C Wrede; C Dodt
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  [Future of emergency medicine in Germany 2.0].

Authors:  A Gries; M Bernhard; M Helm; J Brokmann; J-T Gräsner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Parameters affecting length of stay in a pediatric emergency department: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Kevin D Hofer; Rotraud K Saurenmann
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 4.  [Management of critically ill patients in the resuscitation room. Different than for trauma?].

Authors:  M Bernhard; A Ramshorn-Zimmer; T Hartwig; L Mende; M Helm; J Pega; A Gries
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Study protocol for a prospective, double-blinded, observational study investigating the diagnostic accuracy of an app-based diagnostic health care application in an emergency room setting: the eRadaR trial.

Authors:  S Fatima Faqar-Uz-Zaman; Natalie Filmann; Dora Mahkovic; Michael von Wagner; Charlotte Detemble; Ulf Kippke; Ursula Marschall; Luxia Anantharajah; Philipp Baumartz; Paula Sobotta; Wolf O Bechstein; Andreas A Schnitzbauer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  [Routine Data from Emergency Departments: Varying Documentation Standards, Billing Modalities and Data Custodians at an Identical Unit of Care].

Authors:  Felix Greiner; Anna Slagman; Christoph Stallmann; Stefanie March; Johannes Pollmanns; Patrik Dröge; Christian Günster; Marie-Luise Rosenbusch; Joachim Heuer; Saskia E Drösler; Felix Walcher; Dominik Brammen
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  2019-10-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.