| Literature DB >> 23917113 |
Dong Wook Lim1, Yun Tai Kim, Yu-Jung Jang, Young-Eon Kim, Daeseok Han.
Abstract
This study evaluated the anti-obesity effects of Artemisia capillaris extracts in high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obese rats. After six weeks feeding with HFD, Wistar male rats (12-weeks-old) were divided into three groups: HFD-control group and HFD mixed with 0.4% and 0.8% Artemisia capillaris extracts treated groups. After seven weeks of treatments, the body weight gain of the 0.4% and 0.8% A. capillaris extracts treated groups were significantly less than that of the HFD-control group by 11.8% and 15.4%, respectively. Also, A. capillaris extracts treated groups showed significantly lower serum TG, TC and LDL-c levels in a dose-related manner, while causing the reverse effect in serum HDL-c, and exhibited a hepatoprotective effects in vivo, indicated by reduced hepatic lipid contents, and serum ALT and AST levels. These results show that A. capillaris extracts may prevent body weight increases and improve dyslipidemia in HFD-induced obese rats by enhancing their lipid metabolism.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23917113 PMCID: PMC6269748 DOI: 10.3390/molecules18089241
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
TPC, antioxidant activity and scoparone in different ethanol concentrations.
| Ethanol Concentration | Yield | TPC | RSC | Scoparone |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 10.4 | 86.8 ± 0.09 | 61.9 ± 1.00 | 1.16 ± 0.13 |
| 70 | 15.2 | 99.8 ± 0.03 | 63.4 ± 1.49 | 1.97 ± 0.09 |
| 50 | 15.8 | 139.2 ± 0.40 a | 74.1 ± 0.75 a | 2.81 ± 0.21 a |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD. a A significant increase at p < 0.05, when compared with 100% ethanol concentration.
Figure 12-D HPLC chromatograms for standardization of A. capillaris extracts.
Figure 2Effects of A. capillaris extracts on body weight gain in HFD-induced obese rats. The body weight of the animals was recorded weekly during the experimental period. The body weight gain was calculated by the equation: final body weight − initial body weight. Data are mean ± SD (n = 12 per group). * p < 0.05, significant difference from the HFD-control group.
Effects of A. capillaris extracts on body weight changes, epididymal adipose tissue weight, and food intake in HFD-induced obese rats.
| Groups | Body weight (g) | Body weight gain | Food intake | Energy intake | Epididymal adipose tissue | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial | Final | |||||
| I | 181.4 ± 8.7 | 439.6 ± 20.7 | 3.1 ± 0.2 | 17.4 ± 0.3 | 64.1 ± 1.5 | 9.8 ± 3.1 |
| II | 181.3 ± 7.5 | 498.7 ± 29.1 | 3.7 ± 0.3 | 16.8 ± 0.1 | 87.8 ± 2.1 | 15.1 ± 2.2 |
| III | 180.2 ± 7.2 | 458.6 ± 16.1 a | 3.3 ± 0.2 | 16.6 ± 0.2 | 88.7 ± 0.8 | 12.8 ± 4.8 a |
| IV | 179.7 ± 5.4 | 449.2 ± 26.2 b | 3.2 ± 0.3 a | 16.6 ± 0.1 | 87.4 ± 0.6 | 11.2 ± 2.5 b |
Group I = normal diets (ND); Group II = high fat diet (HFD)-control; Group III = HFD mixed with 0.4% A. capillaris; Group IV = HFD mixed with 0.8% A. capillaris. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. a A significant decrease at p < 0.05, when compared with Group II values. b A significant decrease at p < 0.01, when compared with Group II values.
Effects of A. capillaris extracts on serum lipoproteins in HFD-induced obese rats.
| Groups | TC | TG | HDL-c | LDL-c | CRI | AI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 77.7 ± 10.5 | 77.7 ± 6.1 | 45.5 ± 4.1 | 16.7 ± 8.1 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 0.4 ± 0.2 |
| II | 94.8 ± 6.1 c | 98.3 ± 12.4 c | 44.5 ± 4.3 | 33.6 ± 4.2 c | 2.3 ± 0.3 c | 0.8 ± 0.2 c |
| III | 83.0 ± 8.9 a | 87.7 ± 9.7 a | 48.2 ± 4.8 | 17.3 ± 5.4 a | 1.7 ± 0.1 a | 0.4 ± 0.1 b |
| IV | 82.0 ± 6.6 a | 81.9 ± 9.6 a | 47.9 ± 4.6 | 17.9 ± 4.8 a | 1.7 ± 0.2 a | 0.4 ± 0.3 b |
Data are mean ± SD (n = 12 per group). a A significant decrease at p < 0.05, when compared with Group II values. b A significant decrease at p < 0.01, when compared with Group II values. c A significant increase at p < 0.05, when compared with Group I values. CRI: coronary artery risk index, AI: atherogenic index.
Effects of A. capillaris extracts on HFD-induced fatty liver.
| Groups | Liver weight | SOD | Serum (mg/dL) | Liver lipid (mg/g wet wt) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AST | ALT | TC | TG | |||
| I | 10.0 ± 0.6 | 2.42 ± 0.5 | 115.1 ± 11.6 | 62.1 ± 6.9 | 6.1 ± 0.7 | 37.2 ± 4.9 |
| II | 13.7 ± 0.8 c | 1.98 ± 0.7 | 144.4 ± 25.7 c | 84.5 ± 6.6 c | 10.1 ± 0.8 c | 64.8 ± 7.4 c |
| III | 10.7 ± 0.8 a | 2.41 ± 0.6 | 123.1 ± 16.4 a | 70.3 ± 4.9 b | 7.2 ± 0.6 a | 52.8 ± 6.8 a |
| IV | 10.2 ± 0.7 a | 2.42 ± 0.5 | 118.6 ± 10.5 b | 67.5 ± 6.8 b | 6.5 ± 0.5 a | 44.1 ± 5.8 a |
Data are mean ± SD (n = 12 per group). a A significant decrease at p < 0.05, when compared with Group II values. b A significant decrease at p < 0.01, when compared with Group II values. c A significant increase at p < 0.05, when compared with Group I values.
Figure 3Histological images of liver tissues from HFD-induced obese rats hepatic steatosis displaying the hepatoprotective effects of A. capillaris extracts. There were no histological abnormalities observed in normal diets rats (A). Rats fed with a HFD for 13 weeks develop a high degree of steatosis, showing hepatocytes with severe cytoplasmic vacuoles and swelling (B). The treatments with 0.4% and 0.8% A. capillaris extracts resulted in the prevention of hepatic fatty deposition in hepatocytes (C,D). The tissues were surgically excised and subjected to histological study by staining with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). All magnifications: 100×. The arrows indicate fatty hepatocytes.
Composition of the experimental diets.
| Ingredients | Experimental Groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ND | HFD | HFD mixed with | ||
| 0.40% | 0.80% | |||
| Casein | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Sucrose | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Corn starch | 39.75 | 24.75 | 24.35 | 23.95 |
| Soybean oil | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Dextrose | 13.2 | 13.2 | 13.2 | 13.2 |
| Lard | - | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| Cellulose | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | |
| AIN-mineral mixture | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| AIN-vitamin mixture | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Choline bitrate | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| - | - | 0.4 | 0.8 | |
| Total (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Energy (Kcal/100 g) | 380.2 | 487 | 487 | 487 |