OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine the relationship between niacin treatment, lipoproteins, and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in this secondary analysis of the AIM-HIGH (Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome With Low HDL/High Triglycerides and Impact on Global Health Outcomes) trial. BACKGROUND: During a 3-year follow-up in 3,414 patients with established CV disease and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, combined niacin + low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering therapy did not reduce CV events compared with LDL-C-lowering therapy alone. METHODS: Subjects taking simvastatin and/or ezetimibe were randomized to receive extended-release (ER) niacin 1,500 to 2,000 mg or minimal immediate-release niacin (≤ 150 mg) as placebo at bedtime. LDL-C levels in both groups were maintained from 40 to 80 mg/dl. Hazard ratios were estimated by using Cox proportional hazards models for relationships between lipoproteins and the composite endpoint of CV death, myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, ischemic stroke, or symptom-driven revascularization. RESULTS:CV outcomes were not associated with ER niacin in any baseline lipoprotein tertile. In a subset of patients in both the highest triglyceride (≥ 198 mg/dl) and lowest HDL-C (<33 mg/dl) tertiles, ER niacin showed a trend toward benefit (hazard ratio: 0.74, p = 0.073). In-trial LDL-C levels, non-HDL-C levels, and the total cholesterol/HDL-C ratio were positively associated with CV events in the control group, but these relationships were absent in the ER niacin group. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline lipoprotein tertiles did not predict differential benefit or harm with ER niacin added to LDL-C-lowering therapy, but a small dyslipidemic subgroup may benefit. ER niacin attenuated expected relationships of lipoprotein risk factors with CV events, raising the possibility that nonlipoprotein actions of niacin could affect risk. (Niacin Plus Statin to Prevent Vascular Events [AIM-HIGH]; NCT00120289).
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine the relationship between niacin treatment, lipoproteins, and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in this secondary analysis of the AIM-HIGH (Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome With Low HDL/High Triglycerides and Impact on Global Health Outcomes) trial. BACKGROUND: During a 3-year follow-up in 3,414 patients with established CV disease and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, combined niacin + low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering therapy did not reduce CV events compared with LDL-C-lowering therapy alone. METHODS: Subjects taking simvastatin and/or ezetimibe were randomized to receive extended-release (ER) niacin 1,500 to 2,000 mg or minimal immediate-release niacin (≤ 150 mg) as placebo at bedtime. LDL-C levels in both groups were maintained from 40 to 80 mg/dl. Hazard ratios were estimated by using Cox proportional hazards models for relationships between lipoproteins and the composite endpoint of CV death, myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, ischemic stroke, or symptom-driven revascularization. RESULTS: CV outcomes were not associated with ER niacin in any baseline lipoprotein tertile. In a subset of patients in both the highest triglyceride (≥ 198 mg/dl) and lowest HDL-C (<33 mg/dl) tertiles, ER niacin showed a trend toward benefit (hazard ratio: 0.74, p = 0.073). In-trial LDL-C levels, non-HDL-C levels, and the total cholesterol/HDL-C ratio were positively associated with CV events in the control group, but these relationships were absent in the ER niacin group. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline lipoprotein tertiles did not predict differential benefit or harm with ER niacin added to LDL-C-lowering therapy, but a small dyslipidemic subgroup may benefit. ER niacin attenuated expected relationships of lipoprotein risk factors with CV events, raising the possibility that nonlipoprotein actions of niacin could affect risk. (Niacin Plus Statin to Prevent Vascular Events [AIM-HIGH]; NCT00120289).
Authors: B G Brown; X Q Zhao; A Chait; L D Fisher; M C Cheung; J S Morse; A A Dowdy; E K Marino; E L Bolson; P Alaupovic; J Frohlich; J J Albers Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-11-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Edwin J Whitney; Richard A Krasuski; Bradley E Personius; Joel E Michalek; Ara M Maranian; Mark W Kolasa; Erik Monick; B Gregory Brown; Antonio M Gotto Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2005-01-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Justin M S Lee; Matthew D Robson; Ly-Mee Yu; Cheerag C Shirodaria; Colin Cunnington; Ilias Kylintireas; Janet E Digby; Thomas Bannister; Ashok Handa; Frank Wiesmann; Paul N Durrington; Keith M Channon; Stefan Neubauer; Robin P Choudhury Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-11-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: John J Albers; April Slee; Kevin D O'Brien; Jennifer G Robinson; Moti L Kashyap; Peter O Kwiterovich; Ping Xu; Santica M Marcovina Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-08-21 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Stefan Schandelmaier; Matthias Briel; Ramon Saccilotto; Kelechi K Olu; Armon Arpagaus; Lars G Hemkens; Alain J Nordmann Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-06-14
Authors: Ernst J Schaefer; Pimjai Anthanont; Margaret R Diffenderfer; Eliana Polisecki; Bela F Asztalos Journal: Prog Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2016-08-24 Impact factor: 8.194