Literature DB >> 23916398

Outcomes of repeat colonoscopy in patients with polyps referred for surgery without biopsy-proven cancer.

Shai Friedland1, Subhas Banerjee2, Rajan Kochar2, Ann Chen2, Andrew Shelton3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in endoscopic treatment, many colonic adenomas are still referred for surgical resection. There is a paucity of data on the suitability of these lesions for endoscopic treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the results of routine repeat colonoscopy in patients referred for surgical resection of colon polyps without biopsy-proven cancer.
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Patients referred to a colorectal surgeon for surgical resection of a polyp without biopsy-proven cancer.
INTERVENTIONS: Repeat colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The rate of successful endoscopic treatment.
RESULTS: There were 38 lesions in 36 patients; 71% of the lesions were noncancerous and were successfully treated endoscopically. In 26% of the lesions, previous removal was attempted by the referring physician but was unsuccessful. The adenoma recurrence rate was 50%, but all recurrences were treated endoscopically and none were cancerous. Two patients were admitted for overnight observation. There were no major adverse events. LIMITATIONS: Single center, retrospective.
CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of biopsy-proven invasive cancer, it is appropriate to reevaluate patients referred for surgical resection by repeat colonoscopy at an expert center. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  APC; ESD; HGD; argon plasma coagulation; endoscopic submucosal dissection; high-grade dysplasia

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23916398     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.06.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  16 in total

1.  Morbidity and mortality after surgery for nonmalignant colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Anne F Peery; Nicholas J Shaheen; Katherine S Cools; Todd H Baron; Mark Koruda; Joseph A Galanko; Ian S Grimm
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Validation of the size morphology site access score in endoscopic mucosal resection of large polyps in a district general hospital.

Authors:  A C Currie; H Merriman; S Nadia Shah Gilani; P Mackenzie; M R McFall; M K Baig
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Robert J Schenck; Darius A Jahann; James T Patrie; Edward B Stelow; Dawn G Cox; Dushant S Uppal; Bryan G Sauer; Vanessa M Shami; Daniel S Strand; Andrew Y Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Knife-assisted snare resection (KAR) of large and refractory colonic polyps at a Western centre: Feasibility, safety and efficacy study to guide future practice.

Authors:  Rupam Bhattacharyya; Fergus Jq Chedgy; Kesavan Kandiah; Gaius Longcroft-Wheaton; Pradeep Bhandari
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 4.623

5.  British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctologists of Great Britain and Ireland guidelines for the management of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Matthew D Rutter; Amit Chattree; Jamie A Barbour; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Pradeep Bhandari; Brian P Saunders; Andrew M Veitch; John Anderson; Bjorn J Rembacken; Maurice B Loughrey; Rupert Pullan; William V Garrett; Gethin Lewis; Sunil Dolwani
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Optimizing Resection of Large Colorectal Polyps.

Authors:  Steven J Heitman; David J Tate; Michael J Bourke
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03

Review 7.  Endoscopic resection of tumors in the lower digestive tract.

Authors:  Shi-Lun Cai; Qiang Shi; Tao Chen; Yun-Shi Zhong; Li-Qing Yao
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-11-25

8.  For "difficult" benign colorectal lesions referred to surgical resection a second opinion by an experienced endoscopist is mandatory: A single centre experience.

Authors:  Carmelo Luigiano; Giuseppe Iabichino; Nico Pagano; Leonardo Henry Eusebi; Stefania Miraglia; Antonino Judica; Angela Alibrandi; Clara Virgilio
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-07-25

9.  Declining Colectomy Rates for Nonmalignant Colorectal Polyps in a Large, Ethnically Diverse, Community-Based Population.

Authors:  Asim Alam; Christopher Ma; Sheng-Fang Jiang; Christopher D Jensen; Kenneth H Webb; Eshandeep S Boparai; Terry L Jue; Craig A Munroe; Suraj Gupta; Jeffrey Fox; Christopher M Hamerski; Fernando S Velayos; Douglas A Corley; Jeffrey K Lee
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 10.  Expert opinions and scientific evidence for colonoscopy key performance indicators.

Authors:  Colin J Rees; Roisin Bevan; Katharina Zimmermann-Fraedrich; Matthew D Rutter; Douglas Rex; Evelien Dekker; Thierry Ponchon; Michael Bretthauer; Jaroslaw Regula; Brian Saunders; Cesare Hassan; Michael J Bourke; Thomas Rösch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.