Literature DB >> 23916310

How does an error in positioning the template affect the accuracy of implants inserted using a single fixed mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide?

M Cassetta1, A Di Mambro2, M Giansanti2, L V Stefanelli2, E Barbato2.   

Abstract

Computer-aided implantology using a single fixed stereolithographic surgical guide involves a sequence of diagnostic and therapeutic events, and errors can creep in at different stages. Taken together, these can be termed the 'total error'. A positioning of the surgical guide on the support surface different to that of the diagnostic template may generate an error that reoccurs with all the implants inserted, and this error can be termed the 'guide positioning error'. The aim of the present study was to measure the deviation between the planned and inserted implants due to this guide positioning error, to evaluate if this error was statistically significant, and concurrently, to assess the influence of the type of arch (upper vs lower jaw) and mucosal thickness on the guide positioning error. Twenty-four subjects were treated and 172 implants inserted. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography images were compared using Mimics software to determine the total error and guide positioning error. Quantitative data were described; the t-test and Pearson correlation coefficient were used. The guide positioning error was found to affect the accuracy, but was statistically significant only for global coronal deviation (P = 0.038). Arch of support and mucosa thickness did not affect the guide positioning error.
Copyright © 2013 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computer-aided implantology; implants; position; stereolithographic surgical guide

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23916310     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  7 in total

1.  [Research advances in the use of digital surgical guides in implantology].

Authors:  Xiao-Hua Wang; Ai-Peng Liu; Wen-Zheng Deng
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-02-01

2.  Accuracy of half-guided implant placement with machine-driven or manual insertion: a prospective, randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Kristof Orban; Endre Varga; Peter Windisch; Gabor Braunitzer; Balint Molnar
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 3.  Accuracy of Guided Surgery via Stereolithographic Mucosa-Supported Surgical Guide in Implant Surgery for Edentulous Patient: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cheongbeom Seo; Gintaras Juodzbalys
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2018-03-31

4.  Alveolar ridge preservation and primary stability as influencing factors on the transfer accuracy of static guided implant placement: a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Sigmar Schnutenhaus; Liesa Brunken; Cornelia Edelmann; Jens Dreyhaupt; Heike Rudolph; Ralph G Luthardt
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  Computer-assisted, template-guided immediate implant placement and loading in the mandible: a case report.

Authors:  Thomas Spielau; Uli Hauschild; Joannis Katsoulis
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  Does the macro design of an implant affect the accuracy of template-guided implantation? A prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Sigmar Schnutenhaus; Cornelia Edelmann; Heike Rudolph
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-04-26

7.  Multivariate analysis of causal factors influencing accuracy of guided implant surgery for partial edentulism: a retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  Atsushi Matsumura; Tamaki Nakano; Shinji Ono; Akihiro Kaminaka; Hirofumi Yatani; Daijiro Kabata
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-04-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.