OBJECTIVE: Lean muscle loss has been hypothesized to explain J-shaped relationships of body mass index (BMI) with cardiovascular disease (CVD), yet associations of muscle mass with CVD are largely unknown. We hypothesized that low abdominal lean muscle area would be associated with greater calcified atherosclerosis, independent of other CVD risk factors. MATERIALS/ METHODS: We investigated 1020 participants from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis who were free of clinical CVD. Computed tomography (CT) scans at the 4th and 5th lumbar disk space were used to estimate abdominal lean muscle area. Chest and abdominal CT scans were used to assess coronary artery calcification(CAC), thoracic aortic calcification (TAC), and abdominal aortic calcification (AAC). RESULTS: The mean age was 64±10 years, 48% were female, and mean BMI was 28±5 kg/m2. In models adjusted for demographics, physical activity, caloric intake, and traditional CVD risk factors, there was no inverse association of abdominal muscle mass with CAC (prevalence ratio [PR] 1.02 [95% CI 0.95,1.10]), TAC (PR 1.13 [95% CI 0.92, 1.39]) or AAC (PR 0.99 [95% CI 0.94, 1.04]) prevalence. Similarly, there was no significant inverse relationship between abdominal lean muscle area and CAC, TAC, and AAC severity. CONCLUSION: In community-living individuals without clinical CVD, greater abdominal lean muscle area is not associated with less calcified atherosclerosis. Published by Elsevier Inc.
OBJECTIVE: Lean muscle loss has been hypothesized to explain J-shaped relationships of body mass index (BMI) with cardiovascular disease (CVD), yet associations of muscle mass with CVD are largely unknown. We hypothesized that low abdominal lean muscle area would be associated with greater calcified atherosclerosis, independent of other CVD risk factors. MATERIALS/ METHODS: We investigated 1020 participants from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis who were free of clinical CVD. Computed tomography (CT) scans at the 4th and 5th lumbar disk space were used to estimate abdominal lean muscle area. Chest and abdominal CT scans were used to assess coronary artery calcification(CAC), thoracic aortic calcification (TAC), and abdominal aortic calcification (AAC). RESULTS: The mean age was 64±10 years, 48% were female, and mean BMI was 28±5 kg/m2. In models adjusted for demographics, physical activity, caloric intake, and traditional CVD risk factors, there was no inverse association of abdominal muscle mass with CAC (prevalence ratio [PR] 1.02 [95% CI 0.95,1.10]), TAC (PR 1.13 [95% CI 0.92, 1.39]) or AAC (PR 0.99 [95% CI 0.94, 1.04]) prevalence. Similarly, there was no significant inverse relationship between abdominal lean muscle area and CAC, TAC, and AAC severity. CONCLUSION: In community-living individuals without clinical CVD, greater abdominal lean muscle area is not associated with less calcified atherosclerosis. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Joachim H Ix; Ian H de Boer; Christina L Wassel; Michael H Criqui; Michael G Shlipak; Mary A Whooley Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-03-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Michael H Criqui; Aruna Kamineni; Matthew A Allison; Joachim H Ix; Jeffrey J Carr; Mary Cushman; Robert Detrano; Wendy Post; Nathan D Wong Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2010-09-02 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Abel Romero-Corral; Victor M Montori; Virend K Somers; Josef Korinek; Randal J Thomas; Thomas G Allison; Farouk Mookadam; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-08-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Mary M McDermott; Lu Tian; Luigi Ferrucci; Kiang Liu; Jack M Guralnik; Yihua Liao; William H Pearce; Michael H Criqui Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2008-02-13 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Leendert H Oterdoom; Ron T Gansevoort; Jan P Schouten; Paul E de Jong; Reinold O B Gans; Stephan J L Bakker Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2009-05-21 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Robert Detrano; Alan D Guerci; J Jeffrey Carr; Diane E Bild; Gregory Burke; Aaron R Folsom; Kiang Liu; Steven Shea; Moyses Szklo; David A Bluemke; Daniel H O'Leary; Russell Tracy; Karol Watson; Nathan D Wong; Richard A Kronmal Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-03-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mary M McDermott; Frederick Hoff; Luigi Ferrucci; William H Pearce; Jack M Guralnik; Lu Tian; Kiang Liu; Joseph R Schneider; Leena Sharma; Jin Tan; Michael H Criqui Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Margaret A Crawford; Michael H Criqui; Nketi Forbang; Jonathan T Unkart; Matthew A Allison; Britta A Larsen Journal: Metabolism Date: 2020-04-13 Impact factor: 8.694
Authors: Kwok-Leung Ong; Robyn L McClelland; Kerry-Anne Rye; Bernard M Y Cheung; Wendy S Post; Dhananjay Vaidya; Michael H Criqui; Mary Cushman; Philip J Barter; Matthew A Allison Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2014-07-27 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Christina L Wassel; Gail A Laughlin; Sarah D Saad; Maria Rosario G Araneta; Wilma Wooten; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Matthew A Allison Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Andreas Kammerlander; Asya Lyass; Taylor F Mahoney; Jana Taron; Parastou Eslami; Michael T Lu; Michelle T Long; Ramachandran S Vasan; Joseph M Massaro; Udo Hoffmann Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2022-07-02 Impact factor: 7.034
Authors: Gyu Lee Kim; Hye Rim Hwang; Yun Jin Kim; Sang Yeoup Lee; Jeong Gyu Lee; Dong Wook Jeong; Yu Hyeon Yi; Young Jin Tak; Seung Hun Lee; A Rum Park Journal: Korean J Fam Med Date: 2018-10-31