Literature DB >> 23915616

Creep response of the lumbar spine to prolonged full flexion.

S M McGill1, S Brown.   

Abstract

The time course of full lumbar flexion under a prolonged flexion moment, lasting 20 min, was documented in 27 male and 20 female subjects. Peak flexion increased by 5.5° over the 20 min. The flexion-creep data was fitted with a first-order step input response having a time constant of 9.4 min. Maximum flexion was also documented over the recovery phase, lasting 30 min, indicating that subjects regained approximately 50% of their resting joint stiffness within 2 min of resuming relaxed lordosis, although full recovery took longer than the flexion-creep, indicating the presence of viscoelastic hysteresis. For this reason it may be prudent to advise those who experience prolonged full flexion postures (as might a seated warehouse shipper/receiver, gardener, or construction worker) to stand and walk for a few minutes prior to performing demanding manual exertions. Indeed, temporary joint flexion laxity, following a bout of full flexion, may increase the risk of hyperflexion injury to certain tissues.
Copyright © 1992. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  1992        PMID: 23915616     DOI: 10.1016/0268-0033(92)90007-Q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  35 in total

1.  Pro-inflammatory cytokines expression increases following low- and high-magnitude cyclic loading of lumbar ligaments.

Authors:  Peter D'Ambrosia; Karen King; Bradley Davidson; Bing He Zhou; Yun Lu; Moshe Solomonow
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Passive repetitive loading of the lumbar tissues influences force output and EMG during maximal efforts.

Authors:  Michael W Olson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Effects of static flexion-relaxation on paraspinal reflex behavior.

Authors:  Kevin P Granata; Ellen Rogers; Kevin Moorhouse
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Human lumbar spine creep during cyclic and static flexion: creep rate, biomechanics, and facet joint capsule strain.

Authors:  Jesse S Little; Partap S Khalsa
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Disturbed paraspinal reflex following prolonged flexion-relaxation and recovery.

Authors:  Ellen L Rogers; Kevin P Granata
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Motor control of lumbar instability following exposure to various cyclic load magnitudes.

Authors:  AbdAllah Ben-Masaud; Deborah Solomonow; Bradley Davidson; Bing He Zhou; Yun Lu; Vikas Patel; Moshe Solomonow
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Recommendations for management of uncomplicated back pain in the workers' compensation system: a focus on functional restoration.

Authors:  Raymond P Fowler
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2004

8.  Motor adaptations to trunk perturbation: effects of experimental back pain and spinal tissue creep.

Authors:  Jacques Abboud; Catherine Daneau; François Nougarou; Claude Dugas; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Changes of lumbar posture and tissue loading during static trunk bending.

Authors:  Faisal Alessa; Xiaopeng Ning
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.161

10.  The association between back pain and trunk posture of workers in a special school for the severe handicaps.

Authors:  Kelvin C H Wong; Raymond Y W Lee; Simon S Yeung
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.